<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<root>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/8/1998</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0001</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Ethics Consultation.</title>
		<publication><I>Trends in Health Care, Law and Ethics</I>, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Fall, 1993).</publication>
		<annotation>A special issue containing six articles on ethics consultation: The Legitimation of Ethics Consultation,  by Russell L. McIntyre; A Pro-Active Role for the Ethics Committee or Ethics Consultant,  by George A. Kanoti; Here Come the Ethicists! by Giles R. Scofield; A Nurse-Ethicist Model of Ethics Consultation,  by Patricia A. Murphy; and Can Ethics Consultation be Gender Neutral? by Sandra J. Taylor.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS CONSULTATION, GENDER</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/5/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0002</record_number>
		<author>Weisburd, Dan E., and Vera Hassner, ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Ethics in Neurobiological Research with Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the California Alliance for the Mentally Ill</I>, 5(1):1-70.</publication>
		<annotation>Special issue looking at ethical issues involved in doing research using mentally ill subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FRAUD, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH WITH PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPAIRED, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0003</record_number>
		<author>Blackhall, Leslie J. et al.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Ethnicity and Attitudes toward Patient Autonomy.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274:820-825.</publication>
		<annotation>The authors surveyed 200 elderly subjects who identified themselves as being European American, African American, Korean American or Mexican American. Ethnicity was the strongest predictor of attitudes toward truthtelling and patient decision making. Korean American and Mexican American subjects were less likely to believe that a patient should be told of a terminal prognosis and that a patient should make decisions about the use of life-supporting technology. Instead, they tended to believe that the family should make such decisions. Implications for physician-patient communication are discussed. There are several response letters to this article in JAMA 275(2):107-110.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, TRUTHTELLING, MINORITY POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0004</record_number>
		<author>Knight, J. A.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title>Exploring the Compromise of Ethical Principles in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine</I>, 27:432-441.</publication>
		<annotation>Suggests that pressures to obtain grants, meet high social expectations and achieve success may tempt scientists to commit research fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0005</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J.</author>
		<date>1981</date>
		<title>Fraud and the Structure of Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>. 212:37-41.</publication>
		<annotation>Lack of replication and a professional immunity from scrutiny prevent protection against scientific fraud. However, it may be that fraud is not increasing, but rather that it is being reported with greater frequency because of increased self-policing in today's competitive environment.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PEER REVIEW, SCIENCE RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, WHISTLEBLOWING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0006</record_number>
		<author>Gustafson, James.</author>
		<date>1973</date>
		<title>Genetic Counseling and the Uses of Genetic Knowledge -- An Ethical Overview.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Ethical Issues in Human Genetics</I>, edited by Bruce Hilton, et al., pp. 101-112. New York: Plenum Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A philosophical treatment of the ethical issues involved in genetic counseling relating to genetically-impaired fetuses. Poses the central issue as whether the individual or the community should have primacy in ethical considerations. Discusses the tension between individual rights-based approaches and consequentialist ones, and proposes the need for agreement on minimal objectives about the evils to be avoided in genetic screening.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC COUNSELING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, GENETIC SCREENING, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0007</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title><I>Genetic Gamble</I>.</title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Explores the technical and ethical problems of applying breakthroughs in genetic engineering to the curing of inherited human disease. Examines research aimed at altering an individual's genetic code through insertion of gene sequences for missing enzymes into somatic cells. Illustrates the serious moral and ethical concerns raised by human genetics experimentation.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, VIDEO, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN GENE THERAPY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0008</record_number>
		<author>Lewis, Ricki.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Genetic Marker Testing: Are We Ready for It?</title>
		<publication><I>Issues in Science and Technology</I>, 4(1):76-82.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent discussion of some ethical issues surrounding genetic marker testing, including confidentiality, privacy, public welfare, and the rights of minors and employers.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, CONFIDENTIALITY, CHILDREN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0009</record_number>
		<author>Kolata, Gina.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Genetic Screening Raises Questions for Employers and Insurers.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 232: 17-319.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the range of issues raised by genetic screening, including testing young children, the privacy interests of employees, and the economic interests of employers and insurers to have genetic information. Provides background on the development of genetic screening technology in the workplace.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0010</record_number>
		<author>Baum, Rudy.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Genetic Screening: Medical Promise among Legal and Ethical Questions.</title>
		<publication><I>Chemical and Engineering News</I>, 67:10-16.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent overview of genetic screening, how RFLP analysis works, and the relevant ethical issues, particularly mandatory screening in employment and prenatal context.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0011</record_number>
		<author>Murray, Thomas.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Genetic Testing at Work: How Should It Be Used?</title>
		<publication><I>Technology Review</I>, 88(4):51-59.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an in-depth discussion of the moral issues raised in genetic testing at work. Distinguishes between genetic screening and monitoring, summarizes significant screening programs that have been instituted for PKU and sickle-cell anemia, the purposes of genetic screening and monitoring in the workplace, and the legal implications of screening programs.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC SCREENING, LAW, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0012</record_number>
		<author>Hayes, Catherine V.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Genetic Testing for Huntington's Disease -- A Family Issue.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 327(20):1449-1451.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0013</record_number>
		<author>Macrina, Francis L., and Cindy L. Munro.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Graduate Teaching in Principles of Scientific Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 68:879-884.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, TEACHING, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0014</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Guarding the Guardians: Research on Editorial Peer Review.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 263.</publication>
		<annotation>A special issue of JAMA.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0015</record_number>
		<author>Mitchell, Graham.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Guarding the Middle Ground: The Ethics of Experiments on Animals.</title>
		<publication><I>Current Contents</I>, 22:6-13.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that use of ethics committees is the best means to mediate between the conflicting interests of researchers desiring to use animals in research and anti-vivisectionists.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0016</record_number>
		<author>Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP).</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Science--Institutional Responses and Experience.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process.</I>, Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the growing interaction and continuing unresolved issues between universities, the government, and the courts since the 1980's in policy implementation and investigation concerning scientific misconduct and fraud. Proposes a single independent review organization for handling misconduct and fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, POLICY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0017</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Harvard Delays in Reporting Fraud.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 215:478-482.</publication>
		<annotation>A critical account of the way in which Harvard University handled the fraud case of Dr. John Darsee.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0018</record_number>
		<author>McCormick, Richard A.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Hidden Persuaders: Value Variables in Bioethics.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions.</publication>
		<annotation>Monograph explores the cultural assumptions, or value variables,  that influence bioethical thought and health care planning in general, including: the denial of mortality, the eugenic mentality, rescue medicine, the absolutization of autonomy and dignity as independence.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, EUGENICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0019</record_number>
		<author>Burman, Kenneth.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>'Hanging from the Masthead': Reflections on Authorship.</title>
		<publication><I>Annals of Internal Medicine</I>, 97:602-605.</publication>
		<annotation>Criticizes the general practice of multiple authorship of research articles, which does not accurately represent actual involvement in the underlying research or writing.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0020</record_number>
		<author>La Puma, John</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>'How Much Do You Get If I Volunteer?': Suggested Institutional Policy on Reward, Consent, and Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Hospital and Health Services Administration</I>, 392:193-203.</publication>
		<annotation>Suggests a model policy and guidelines for the ethical conduct of post-marketing research on new drugs by practicing physicians.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICES, INFORMED CONSENT, COMPENSATION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0021</record_number>
		<author>Coppola, Brian P., and David H. Smith.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>A Case for Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Chemical Education</I>, 73(1):33-34.</publication>
		<annotation>The first author is a practicing chemist; the second an ethicist. Argues for an explicit ethical perspective in science education and offers three instructional objectives: the development of character, the development of cognitive skills, and the development of disciplinary skills.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CHEMISTRY, TEACHING, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0022</record_number>
		<author>Sprague, Robert.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>A Case of Whistleblowing in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Perspectives on the Professions</I> 8:4-5.</publication>
		<annotation>A brief account of the author's experiences in blowing the whistle on the research misconduct of then-colleague Stephen Breuning.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, SCIENCE RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0023</record_number>
		<author>Wright, N. D.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>A Citation Context Analysis of Retracted Scientific Articles.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.</publication>
		<annotation>This dissertation looked at whether published retractions of articles (1963-1987) either because of error or scientific misconduct decreased citations to them. The author found a significant difference between the number of pre- and post-retraction citations, but 90% of remaining citations were positive.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0024</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, P. J.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>A Last Call for Self-Regulation of Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 64:502-504.</publication>
		<annotation>Several suggestions are made to improve the climate within which scientific research takes place, including formal institutional oversight and active faculty involvement in setting standards.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0025</record_number>
		<author>Petersdorf, R. G.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title>A Matter of Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 64:199-123.</publication>
		<annotation>Medical fraud and misconduct are suggested to be the result of hypercompetitive premedical and medical school environments.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FRAUD, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0026</record_number>
		<author>The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>A Novel Gene Containing a Trinucleotide Repeat That Is Expanded and Unstable on Huntington's Disease Chromosomes.</title>
		<publication><I>Cell</I>, 72:971-983.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0027</record_number>
		<author>Kalichman, M. W., and P. J. Friedman.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>A Pilot Study of Biomedical Trainees' Perceptions Concerning Research Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 67:769-765 (?).</publication>
		<annotation>Presents survey results in which biomedical trainees were asked about their perceptions of unethical research practices and their exposure to research ethics instruction.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0028</record_number>
		<author>Rest, James R.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>A Psychologist Looks at the Teaching of Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report</I>, pp. 29-36.</publication>
		<annotation>Proposes that psychological researchers and ethics instructors collaborate, so as to locate ethics instruction in a moral development framework and to refine evaluation of student processes and progress in ethical decision-making.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, PSYCHOLOGY, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>4/4/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0029</record_number>
		<author>Center for Applied Ethics.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Academic Integrity: The Bridge to Professional Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Durham, NC: Center for Applied Ethics, School of Engineering, Duke University.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, MISCONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0030</record_number>
		<author>Smith, Steven, and Deborah Richardson.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title>Amelioration of Deception and Harm in Psychological Research: The Important Role of Debriefing.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</I>, 44(5):1075-1082.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports on the effects of deception and harm on research participants in psychology experiments, based on the perceptions of 464 undergraduate students enrolled in psychology courses. Approximately 20 percent of the subjects reported harm, but there was no correlation between deception and perception of harm. The authors also consider the role of debriefing in eliminating negative effects for those participants who perceived they had been harmed, and concludes participation as research subjects may be beneficial.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGY, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0031</record_number>
		<author>Wertz, Dorothy, and John Fletcher, eds.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>An International Survey of Attitudes of Medical Geneticists toward Mass Screening and Access to Results.</title>
		<publication><I>Public Health Reports</I>, 35(10):104.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses genetic researchers' attitudes about patients' rights to information and to confidentiality about the results of screening tests for genetic diseases.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0032</record_number>
		<author>Morrison, Adrian R.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Animal Rights Philosophy Versus Biological Reality.</title>
		<publication><I>Iowa State University Veterinarian</I>, 58(1):10-17.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides a brief overview of Peter Singer's utilitarian and Tom Regan's rights-based objections to animal research and challenges their understanding of the status of animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0033</record_number>
		<author>Donnelly, Strachan, and Kathleen Nolan, eds.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Animals, Science, and Ethics.</title>
		<publication>Special Supplement, <I>Hastings Center Report</I>, Vol. 20, No. 3 (May/June).</publication>
		<annotation>An informative, in-depth discussion of the ethical implications of the use of animals in research. Contents include an introductory overview; summary of applicable ethical theories and their usefulness applied to animals; consideration of rationales used to justify using animals in science and how to best determine animal suffering; overview of animal care and use committees and review procedures; and discussion of policy issues relating to the use of animals in research, testing, and education.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, POLICY, RESEARCH ETHICS, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0034</record_number>
		<author>Gallup, Gordon, and Jason Beckstead.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Attitudes toward Animal Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 43(6):474-476.</publication>
		<annotation>Summarizes results of survey on animal research conducted with 263 undergraduate students on animal research. Survey revealed that 76% expressed concern about pain and suffering in animals, yet 81% preferred to see animals used in research rather than humans die or suffer from disease, 66.9% agreed that drugs and surgical procedures should be tested on animals before being administered to humans, and 62% believed some animal research is necessary.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0035</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Derek.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Balancing Responsibility and Innovation.</title>
		<publication><I>Change</I>, 14:16-25.</publication>
		<annotation>An excellent discussion of the issues faced by a university attempting to negotiate technology transfer and control the growth and direction of its relationship with industry.</annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0036</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1963</date>
		<title>Behavioral Study of Obedience.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology</I>, 6(4): 371-378.</publication>
		<annotation>Milgram reports study results.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0037</record_number>
		<author>LaFollette, Marcel C.</author>
		<date>1988-89.</date>
		<title>Beyond Plagiarism: Ethical Misconduct in Scientific and Technical Publishing.</title>
		<publication><I>Book Research Quarterly</I>, 4: 65-73.</publication>
		<annotation>Analyzes the growing problem of scientific misconduct from a historical perspective, tracing changes in the nature of the scientific community from World War II, and the growing involvement of the government in research, including regulation.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, PLAGIARISM, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0038</record_number>
		<author>Handyside, A.H., et al.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Birth of a Normal Girl after In Vitro Fertilization and Preimplantation Diagnostic Testing for Cystic Fibrosis.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 327:905-909.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, GYNECOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0039</record_number>
		<author>Paul, Diane.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>A History of the Eugenics Movement and of Its Multiple Effects on Public Policy.</title>
		<publication><I>Scientific American</I>, 254:27-31.</publication>
		<annotation>Book Review of Daniel Kevles, <I>In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity</I>. Generally positive review of Kevles' historical treatment of eugenics, particularly his consideration of how that history can inform current policymakers about the social benefits and pitfalls of individual reproductive decisions. The review discusses the difficulty of defining eugenics and criticizes both the appropriateness of Kevles' sharp distinction between old and newer eugenics movements and his portrayal of the historical figures involved as good guys and bad guys.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, HISTORY, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0040</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Derek C.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Can Ethics Be Taught?</title>
		<publication><I>Change</I>, Oct.:26-30.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0041</record_number>
		<author>McAskie, M.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>Carelessness or Fraud in Sir Cyril Burt's Kinship Data?: A Critique of Jensen's Analysis.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 72:496-497.</publication>
		<annotation>Replies to Jensen (1978, Sir Cyril Burt in Perspective,  <I>American Psychologist</I>, 78 (449-503), disputing that Burt's actions reflected mere carelessness.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0042</record_number>
		<author>Hanson, Shirley.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Collaborative Research and Authorship Credit: Beginning Guidelines.</title>
		<publication><I>Nursing Research</I>. 37:49-52.</publication>
		<annotation>Synthesizes a number of studies on collaborative research and multiple authorship to derive a number of practical principles for how to proceed with such research.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0043</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Conflicts of Interests: Kittens and Boa Constrictors, Pets and Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 45(3):246-248.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that even seemingly benign relations with animals, namely, keeping carnivorous animals as pets, raises some of the same questions as the use of animals in scientific research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0044</record_number>
		<author>Ulrich, Roger.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Animal Rights, Animal Wrongs, and the Question of Balance.</title>
		<publication><I>Psychological Science</I>, 2(3):197-201.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues for balance in the use and treatment of animals, contending that both the anti-vivisectionists and the researchers who conduct experimentation with animals are guilty of excesses.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEACH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0045</record_number>
		<author>Fischbach, Ruth, and Lynn Peterson.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Conflict of Interest Case.</title>
		<publication>The Program in the Practice of Scientific Investigation, Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes teaching notes. Contact Ruth Fischbach, Co-Director (with Lynn Peterson), The Program in the Practice of Scientific Investigation, Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School, 643 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0046</record_number>
		<author>Council of Biology Editors, Editorial Policy Committee. John C. Bailar III, Chair.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Conflicts of Interest.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication</I>, p. 32. Bethesda: Council of Biology Editors, Inc. p. 32.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BIOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0047</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Confronting the Killer Gene</I>.</title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines the implications of a new laboratory test that can detect the presence of Huntington Disease, a hereditary disorder characterized by nervous deterioration and certain death. Focuses on four individuals, including well-known musician Arlo Guthrie, who are all faced with a decision: to test or not to test.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, VIDEO, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0048</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, P. J.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 263, No. 10(Mar. 9):1416-1419.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0049</record_number>
		<author>Charon, Rita, and Renee C. Fox.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Critiques and Remedies: Medical Students Call for Change in Ethics Teaching.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274(9):767, 771.</publication>
		<annotation>Medical students' essays highlight pitfalls in their professional socialization and their desire for ongoing mentoring relationships with mature physician-teachers who could model ethical medical practice.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, MENTORING, BIOEMEDICAL ETHICS, TEACHING ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0050</record_number>
		<author>Brown, A. S., and D. R. Murphy.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Cryptomnesia: Delineating Inadvertent Plagiarism.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Experimental Psychology</I>, 15:432-442.</publication>
		<annotation>Explains the phenomenon of cryptomnesia, which is being used as a defense in scientific plagiarism cases. Cryptomnesia is the presence of a memory in one's consciousness that is not recognized as such, but is experienced as a new phenomenon.</annotation>
		<keywords>PLAGIARISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0051</record_number>
		<author>Freedland, K. E., and R. M. Carney.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Data Management and Accountability in Behavioral and Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 47:640-645.</publication>
		<annotation>Errors in obtaining and storing data in computer systems may occur because of honest mistakes or carelessness. The authors support mandated guidelines for record keeping and data storage and instruction in data management skills.</annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0052</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health; Office of Health Planning and Evaluation; and Office of Scientific Integrity Review.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Data Management in Biomedical Research: Report of a Workshop.</I></title>
		<publication></publication>
		<annotation>Provides useful discussion on issues of data ownership, sharing, and retention.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, SECRECY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0053</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Data Sharing: A Declining Ethic?</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 248:952-957.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0054</record_number>
		<author>Woolf, Patricia.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Deception in Scientific Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Jurimetrics Journal</I>, 29(Fall):67-95.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an interesting discussion of misconduct in research, including a summary of a number of fairly recent cases, how they were dealt with, and how the wrongdoers were disciplined.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>4/4/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0055</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Decoding the Book of Life</I>.</title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Portrays the history of the Human Genome Project, placed in the context of the eugenics movement, development of genetic screening, treatment of genetic disease, and the choices that will need to be made regarding the use of molecular genetic techniques in human breeding.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, VIDEO, EUGENEICS, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0056</record_number>
		<author>Ben-Yehuda, N.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Deviance in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>The British Journal of Criminology</I>, 26:1-27.</publication>
		<annotation>Uses case examples to explain how several characteristics of the scientific community--including lack of replication and suppression of investigations--may lead to misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, SECRECY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0057</record_number>
		<author>Bechtel, H. K., and W. Pearson.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Deviant Scientists and Scientific Deviance.</title>
		<publication><I>Deviant Behavior</I>, 6:237-252.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at scientific fraud from three sociological perspectives of deviance, presenting it as an elite occupational deviance legitimized by the increasingly business-like approach to science.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/9/1997</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0058</record_number>
		<author>Anderson, Melissa S., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Disciplinary and Departmental Effects on Observations of Faculty and Graduate Student Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Higher Education</I>, 65(3):331-350.</publication>
		<annotation>Part of the Acadia Institute's Project on Professional Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Examines the effects of departmental and disciplinary contexts (specifically departmental structure, departmental climate, and discipline) on graduate students' exposure to three forms of misconduct: research, employment, and personal.</annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0059</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Discussing Animal Rights and Animal Research in the Classroom.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 17:90-94.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews utilitarian and rights arguments for animal liberation, presents a classroom exercise involving four cases which students decide as members of an Animal Care and Use Committee, and reports that students' participating in the exercise raised their awareness of the issue and its complexity.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CASE STUDIES, ETHICAL THEORY, TEACHING ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0060</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>Do Scientists Cheat?</I></title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines why scientific fraud is so hard to detect and details the numerous factors that influence fraud, including an increasing competition for grant money and tenured positions. Discusses why scientists may be less than honest, analyzes how our scientific system deals with quality control, and considers the adequacy of the scientific community's response when a researcher is involved in fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, TRUTHTELLING, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0061</record_number>
		<author>Dewsbury, Donald.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Early Interactions between Animal Psychologists and Animal Activists and the Founding of the APA Committee on Precautions in Animal Experimentation.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, Mar. 1990:315-327.</publication>
		<annotation>Demonstrates that the contemporary conflict between animal psychologists is not new but dates back to the Victorian antivivisectionist movement, and discusses the effects of the early controversy.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, PSYCHOLOGY, HISTORY, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0062</record_number>
		<author>Clingerman, Karen.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Ethical and Moral Issues Relating to Animals 1979-1988.</title>
		<publication>Quick Bibliography Series. Beltsville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.</publication>
		<annotation>Contains short annotations of 270 works.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0063</record_number>
		<author>Sieber, Joan E., and Barbara Stanley.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Ethical and Professional Dimensions of Socially Sensitive Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 43(4):49-55.</publication>
		<annotation>Proposes a taxonomy of ethical analysis for considering the ethical dimensions of socially sensitive research, both in the formulation of the research question, as well as in the conduct of the research and treatment of subjects. The taxonomy covers considerations of privacy, confidentiality, sound and valid methodology, deception, informed consent, justice and equitable treatment, scientific freedom, ownership of data, the values of epistemology of social scientists, and risk/benefit ratio.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, CONFIDENTIALITY, HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, INFORMED CONSENT, DATA MANAGEMENT, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0064</record_number>
		<author>Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title><I>Ethical Dilemmas in Research.</I></title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation><I>Five scenarios presented in script form, with minimal narrative background, address problems of collaboration and authorship, plagiarism, and falsification of data. These are possibly more effective if play-acted rather than simply read individually. Contact: Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142</I></annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, PLAGIARISM, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, AUTHORSHIP, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH DATA, FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/1/1994</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0065</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Chemical Society</I>, 116(13):8A-10A.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes guidelines on the ethical obligations of editors of scientific journals, of authors, of reviewers, and of scientists publishing outside of scientific literature.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, PUBLISHING, CHEMISTRY, PEER REVIEW, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0066</record_number>
		<author>Mertzman, Robert, and Peter Madsen.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Professional Life: A Multimedia Course.</title>
		<publication>Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.</publication>
		<annotation>A text chapter and distance education video address the role of science in contemporary society, and types and incidences of scientific misconduct and whistleblowing. The text includes an historical overview of the issues by Philosopher of Science, Steven Turner. The video features Dr. Robert L. Sprague, Professor of Psychology and Medicine.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, HISTORY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0067</record_number>
		<author>Goldman, Alan.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Proprietary Restrictions on Research Results.</title>
		<publication><I>Science, Technology, and Human Values</I>, 12:22-30.</publication>
		<annotation>A sophisticated analysis of the value issues surrounding patents in the academic context. Provides a sound analysis of the arguments for and against patent ownership by faculty researchers.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH ETHICS, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0068</record_number>
		<author>Garfield, Sol.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Research on Psychotherapy.</title>
		<publication><I>Counseling and Values</I>, 31(2):115-125.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses differences in attitude about treatment of human subjects in research vs. therapy, the ethical problems with nontreatment control groups, and proposed solutions to these problems.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0069</record_number>
		<author>Graedon, Joe D., moderator and Harvey C. Krasny, director.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Scientific Research: A Public Forum</I>.</title>
		<publication>The Research Triangle Park Club of Sigma Xi, P.O. Box 13416, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 800/768-4336 or 803/269-7744.</publication>
		<annotation>Panel discussion of hypothetical cases on authorship, peer review, data management, social responsibility, fraud and research communication.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, AUTHORSHIP, DATA MANAGEMENT, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, PEER REVIEW, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0070</record_number>
		<author>Campbell, Donald.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in the Research Publication Process.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Ethical Dilemmas for Academic Professionals</I>, edited by S.L. Payne and B.H. Charnov, pp. 69-85. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.</publication>
		<annotation>A general overview of a number of issues involved in publishing research, including plagiarism, multiple authorship, public review process, faculty obligations to students, and distortion of findings.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PLAGIARISM, AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0071</record_number>
		<author>Swazey, Judith P. et al.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Ethical Problems in Academic Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 81:543-553.</publication>
		<annotation>Part of the Acadia Institute's Project on Professional Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Surveys doctoral candidates and faculty in 100 departments of chemistry, civil engineering, microbiology, and sociology and finds substantial exposure to three areas of ethical problems: misconduct (including fabrication, falsification and plagiarism); questionable research practices (including poor research records and honorary authorship); and other misconduct,  such as sexual harassment and violation of governmental regulations. Analyzes the variations across discipline, and indicates need to rethink bad apple theory of misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ACADEMIC ETHICS, CHEMISTRY, BIOLOGY, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, DATA MANAGEMENT, SCIENCE RESEARCH, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, FRAUD, PALGIARISM, AUTHORSHIP, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ENGINEERGING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0072</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, Paul J.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Ethical Problems in Research for Discussion and Problems for Administrators.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Two sets of brief case studies (17 in all), dealing with issues of authorship, intellectual property, plagiarism, and fabrication of data, are presented as examples of the controversies with which university administrators will need to be prepared to deal. Contact: School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, 92037.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, AUTHORSHIP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PALGIARISM, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0073</record_number>
		<author>Zak, Steven.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Ethics and Animals.</title>
		<publication><I>The Atlantic Monthly</I>, 263(3):68-74.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the so-called radical views of contemporary animal rights groups relative to the past, considers differences between virtue and rights approaches to the ethical treatment of animals, showing how the former inadequately protects animals, and concludes that legal recognition of animals' rights is necessary to their adequate protection.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0074</record_number>
		<author>Feeney, Dennis.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Human Rights and Animal Welfare.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 47(6): 593-597.</publication>
		<annotation>A defense of animal experimentation written by a researcher crippled by incurable paraplegia. Critiques the antivivisectionist movement for neglecting the suffering of humans caused by failure to experiment on animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0075</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Human Rights and Child Health.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 27(4):565.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CHILDREN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0076</record_number>
		<author>Loeb, Jerod.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Human vs. Animal Rights.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of American Medicine</I>, 262(19).</publication>
		<annotation>Condensed version of the American Medical Association's detailed analysis of the controversy over the use of animals in research, including reports on the destructive and violent actions of animal rights activist movements and discussion of the consequences for research if the activists prevail.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0077</record_number>
		<author>Wong, P. T.</author>
		<date>1981</date>
		<title>Implicit Editorial Policies and the Integrity of Psychology as an Empirical Science.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 690:692.</publication>
		<annotation>Author suggests that editorial practices may encourage fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PSYCHOLOGY, FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0078</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise and Political Influence in Scientific Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Technology Review</I> 96(Feb.-Mar.):69.</publication>
		<annotation>A review of the book by Robert Bell by the same title.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0079</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, Paul J.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Integrity in Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine, </I>, 68, Supplement 3.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0080</record_number>
		<author>Branscomb, Lewis.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Integrity in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 73:421-423.</publication>
		<annotation>A personal perspective on the costs that researchers' lack of integrity and honesty -- often in the form of honest mistakes with data -- has on the scientific community as a whole. Calls for commitment to quality and integrity among young scientists, career gatekeepers (e.g. tenure committees), and journal editors and working scientists.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, TRUTHTELLING, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/20/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0081</record_number>
		<author>Krulwich, Terry Ann, and Paul J. Friedman.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Integrity in the Education of Researchers.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 68(9).</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0082</record_number>
		<author>Zatz, Joel.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Intellectual Property: An Academician's Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education</I>, 53:346-350.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent general background to the issues surrounding patents in the academic context, including faculty research support, publication, students, record-keeping, and confidentiality.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, CONFIDENTIALITY, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0083</record_number>
		<author>Shaw, Margery.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Testing for the Huntington Gene: A Right to Know, a Right Not to Know, or a Duty to Know.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Medical Genetics</I>, 26: 243-246.</publication>
		<annotation>This brief article succinctly discusses the ethical problems surrounding patients's rights to obtain and to refuse knowledge after presymptomatic testing for Huntington Disease, part of a necessary program to eliminate the Huntington gene from the human species.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0084</record_number>
		<author>Capron, Alexander.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Is Consent Always Necessary in Social Science Research?</title>
		<publication>in <I>Ethical Issues in Social Science Research</I>, edited by Tom Beauchamp, Ruth Faden, R. Jay Wallace, and LeRoy Walters, pp. 215-231. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that informed consent may not be necessary in social science research when there are other means to fulfill its underlying purposes, including the promotion of autonomy and the protection of privacy.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/11/1994</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0085</record_number>
		<author>Altman, Douglas G., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Is There a Case for an International Medical Scientific Press Council?</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 272, No. 2 (July 13):166-167.</publication>
		<annotation>Briefly presents three cases of authors who believe they have been dealt with unfairly by editors and suggests that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors turn its attention to editorial misconduct and explore possible procedures for allowing authors' grievances to be heard and for possible sanctions if complaints are upheld.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, CASE STUDIES, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/8/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0086</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Is There Intelligent (Animal) Life on Earth?</title>
		<publication><I>Dogs Annual</I>, pp. 144-147.</publication>
		<annotation>For too long, science has dismissed the possibility that animals think. It's time to ask not 'if, ' but 'how.'</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0087</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1964</date>
		<title>Issues in the Study of Obedience: A Reply to Baumrind.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 19:848-852.</publication>
		<annotation>Milgram responds to criticism of his studies.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0088</record_number>
		<author>Robertson, John A.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Legal Issues in Genetic Testing, </title>
		<publication>in <I>The Genome, Ethics and the Law: Issues in Genetic Testing</I>, pp. 79-110. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0089</record_number>
		<author>Relman, A. S.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title>Lessons from the Darsee Affair.</title>
		<publication><I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 208:1415-1417.</publication>
		<annotation>The author suggests that the Darsee case indicates that science is not self-correcting. Recommendations to prevent fraud are presented.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0090</record_number>
		<author>Jones, Anne Hudson.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Literature as Mirror or Lamp?: Commentary on 'Literature, Medical Ethics, and 'Epiphanic Knowledge'''.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5:4:340-341.</publication>
		<annotation>Short commentary that provides background information on the critique of principle-based medical ethics and the recent use of narrative and dramatic literature to complement analytic medical ethics. Comments on article by Anne Hunsaker Hawkins on pp. 283-290 of same issue.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0091</record_number>
		<author>Hawkins, Anne Hunsaker.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Literature, Medical Ethics, and 'Epiphanic Knowledge'.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5(4)283-290.</publication>
		<annotation>The author argues that the insights that lyric poetry provides and the faculties it engages provide a needed complement to the philosophy-based ethics that dominates today's medical ethical discourse.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0092</record_number>
		<author>Kuczewski, Mark, et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Make My Case: Ethics Teaching and Case Presentations.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5(4):310-315.</publication>
		<annotation>The authors recommend real-life cases for teaching ethical problem solving. They explore the specific educational needs of two groups--medical students and health-care professionals--and offer guidelines for making oral and written case presentations.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0093</record_number>
		<author>Olmstead, Marjorie A.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Mentoring New Faculty: Advice to Department Chairs.</title>
		<publication>in <I>CSWP</I>, a newsletter of the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics of The American Physical Society, Vol. 14, No., 1, pp. 1, 8-11.</publication>
		<annotation>Paper originally prepared for an invited talk at a 1993 conference of physics chairs; presents suggestions for increasing the chances of success for new faculty members.</annotation>
		<keywords>MENTORING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0094</record_number>
		<author>Waxman, Merle.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Mentoring, Role Modeling, and the Career Development of Junior Science Faculty.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of College Science Teaching</I>, 22:124-127.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>MENTORING, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0095</record_number>
		<author>Djerassi, Carl.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Mentoring: A Cure for Science Bashing?</title>
		<publication><I>Chemical and Engineering News</I>, 69 (Nov. 25):30-33.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>MENTORING, CHEMISTRY, ENGINEERING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0096</record_number>
		<author>Van de Kamp, J., and M. M. Cummings.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title><I>Misconduct and Fraud In the Life Sciences.</I></title>
		<publication>National Library of Medicine Literature Search 87-14. Order by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: Literature Search Program, Referee Section, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.</publication>
		<annotation>Citiations about deception and misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, MISCONDUCT, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0097</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Misconduct in Science and Engineering.</title>
		<publication><I>Federal Register</I>, 56(May 14):22287-22290.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, ENGINEERING, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0098</record_number>
		<author>Roberts, Leslie.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Misconduct: Caltech's Trial by Fire.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 253:1344-47.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports investigations into allegations of scientific fraud by two biology postdocs at Caltech. The article and subsequent letters from key players raise the important issues of due process and the need for external investigating committees, as well as the potential need for a course addressing scientific misconduct for new graduate students, and the responsibility of the laboratory chief in establishing ethical lab conditions.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, BIOLOGY, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, TEACHING ETHICS, MISCONDUCT, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0099</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, P. J.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Mistakes and Fraud in Medical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Law, Medicine, and Health Care</I>, 20:17-25.</publication>
		<annotation>In cases of research misconduct, a balance must be struck between the acceptance of common, petty deception and protecting scientists from guardians of purity,  while protecting the public from research fraud. Presents a spectrum of scientific misrepresentation with petty deception at one end and fraud on the other.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/8/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0100</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Monkey See, Human Do: The Study of Primate-Human Communication.</title>
		<publication><I>Semiotica</I>, 109(3/4):357-360.</publication>
		<annotation>Review of <I>Aping Language</I> by Joel Wallman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0101</record_number>
		<author>Sheldon, Mark, et al.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Nazi Data: Dissociation from Evil.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report</I>, pp. 16-18.</publication>
		<annotation>Three commentaries on the use of Nazi data in contemporary medical research. One measured defense--based on conditions of the data's reliability, unavailability from other sources, contribution to the greater good, and publication with condemnation of the means of its initial collection--is twice countered in the name of researchers' moral integrity and refusal to legitimize the Nazis.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, PUBLISHING, DATA MANAGEMENT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0102</record_number>
		<author>Berger, Robert L.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Nazi Science--The Dachau Hypothermia Experiments.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 322:1435-1440.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews Dachau experiments and argues against use of data based on critical shortcomings in scientific content and credibility. Also argues against furthering this ethical debate so as not to suggest that Nazi experimentation yielded results worthy of consideration and beneficial to humanity.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0103</record_number>
		<author>Wheeler, D. L.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>NIH Office That Investigates Scientists' Misconduct is Target of Widespread Charges of Incompetence.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, May 15, 1991:A5, A8.</publication>
		<annotation>The Office of Scientific Integrity has been criticized for inefficiency, lethargy, leniency and poor organization.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0104</record_number>
		<author>Holden, C.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>NIMH Finds a Case of Serious Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 235:1566-1567.</publication>
		<annotation>Oulines charges of misconduct against Dr. Stephen Breuning, a psychologist accused on inventing raw data and publishing the results of non-existent experiments. The results were used in social policy making.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, PUBLISHING, PSYCHOLOGY, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0105</record_number>
		<author>Buzzelli, Donald E.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>NSF's Definition of Misconduct in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:273-296.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] addresses questions about the process of handling misconduct cases, this time from his point of view in a government agency. But his main focus is to address in detail a controversial question that is at least touched on in each of the other articles: the controversy over the definition of scientific misconduct. He gives an extended analysis of the various arguments against NSF's 'open-ended' definition, and attempts to show that the attack on the definition as open to abuse via arbitrary interpreation is a result of misunderstanding (p. 214).</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, POLICY, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0106</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1949</date>
		<title>Nuremberg Code.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law</I> No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Also, reprinted in <I>Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research</I>.</publication>
		<annotation>Drafted in response to the atrocities committed in Nazi experimentation with human subjects. Sets forth the basic principles for ethical experimentation, including informed consent, social benefit that outweighs risk to subjects, avoidance of harm, necessity, qualified researchers and the subject's right to terminate the experiment at any point.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0107</record_number>
		<author>Audi, Robert.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>On the Ethics of Teaching and the Ideals of Learning.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Sept-Oct.:27-36.</publication>
		<annotation>Monograph articulates four central pedagogic paradigms in college teaching (didactic, apprentice, collegial and friendship) and identifies pertinent ethical principles for the faculty-student relationship in each.</annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0108</record_number>
		<author>Braxton, John M., ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Perspectives on Research Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 65(3):242-400.</publication>
		<annotation>Special issue aimed at increasing knowledge and understanding of collective responsibility for the deterrence, detection and handling of misconduct by scientists, universities, academic journals, grant-giving agencies and legislatures.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>6/6/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0109</record_number>
		<author>Jonas, Hans.</author>
		<date>1969</date>
		<title>Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Daedalus</I>, 98(2):219-47.</publication>
		<annotation>Considers the use of human subjects to be a balance of social needs vs. matters of individual sacrosanticity and personal dignity. Argues that consent to experimentation, regardless of the importance of the research, is insufficient because of the primacy of the individual and the personal sacrifice involved. Also argues that it is necessary to consider how proximate the subject's interests are to those of the interests of the researcher and whether the experiment relates to the subject's own disease.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS, SELECTION OF SUBJECTS, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0110</record_number>
		<author>Pardes, Herbert, et al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Physicians and the Animal-Rights Movement.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 324(4):1640-1643.</publication>
		<annotation>Warns of the dangers that animal-rights activists pose to medical research, discusses the tactics of activists, including frightening the public, using psychological warfare,  violence, legal maneuvers, and the myth of alternatives, and urges physicians to inform their patients about the benefits and importance of experimentation with animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0111</record_number>
		<author>Budiansky, Stephen.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Playing Roulette with Experimental Drugs.</title>
		<publication><I>U.S. News and World Report</I>, 103(July 13):58-59.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews the ethical issue arising from physician-researchers' zeal to enroll subjects in experimental drug tests that may not be in the subjects' best interests.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0112</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, Paul J.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Practical Ethical Issues in Scientific Research: Outline of a Discussion.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Lecture/course outline addresses boundaries between research practice and unethical actions, sources of practical problems, and research training and supervision. Contact: School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, 92037.</annotation>
		<keywords>SYLLABUS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0113</record_number>
		<author>Hayden, Michael R.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease: Are We Ready for Widespread Community Implementation?</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Medical Genetics</I>, 40:515-517.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0115</record_number>
		<author>Wexler, Nancy.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Presymptomatic Testing for Huntington's Disease: Harbinger of the New Genetics.</title>
		<publication><I>National Forum</I>, 73:22-26.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0116</record_number>
		<author>Dorozynski, Alexander.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Privacy Rules Blindside French Glaucoma Effort.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 252 (April 19):369-370.</publication>
		<annotation>Report on the ethical implications of a plan in a French village to notify potential carriers of a genetic defect that can lead to blindness.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0117</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1974</date>
		<title>Problems of Ethics in Research.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View</I>, pp. 193-202. New York: Harper and Row Publishing.</publication>
		<annotation>Milgram defends the ethical legitimacy of his experiments that involved the deception of human subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/6/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0118</record_number>
		<author>Heath, A.G.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Professional Ethics for Research Biologists.</title>
		<publication><I>BioScience</I>, 39:472-474.</publication>
		<annotation>Outlines ethical issues involved in five states of research and its applications: initial ideas for research, gathering data, interpretation of results, publication and evaluation of research and dealing with peers.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, DATA MANAGEMENT, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0119</record_number>
		<author>Blair, Claudia, and Walter Schaffer.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Promotion of the Responsible Conduct of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>NIH Peer Review Notes, </I>, June:4-6.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>POLICY, MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0120</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Protection of Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Code of Federal Regulations</I>, Title 45, Part 46.</publication>
		<annotation>Sets forth federal regulations for the protection of human subjects -- the institutional review board system.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, IRB (INSTITIONAL REVIEW BOARD), RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0121</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary, and Patricia Woolf</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Regulating a 'Knowledge Business': The Research Community Must Better Investigate--and Prevent--Scientific Misconduct, Lest Others Fill the Breach.</title>
		<publication><I>Issues in Science and Technology</I>, 5(2):33.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0122</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Report Absolves Harvard in Case of Fakery.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 215:875-876.</publication>
		<annotation>Suggests that Harvard University was cleared of wrong-doing in the Dr. John Darsee fraud case because of an inadequate investigation. Presents the investigating committee's recommendations for reducing the occurrence of research misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0123</record_number>
		<author>Chubin, Daryl.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Research Malpractice.</title>
		<publication><I>Bioscience</I>, 35:80-89.</publication>
		<annotation>A useful reference article that draws distinctions between practice and malpractice at four stages in the scientific research process: production, reporting, disseminating, and evaluating ideas and information. Chubin reviews responses to malpractice and measures to control it within academic, governmental and public contexts.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0124</record_number>
		<author>Burk, Dan L.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Research Misconduct: Deviance, Due Process, and the Disestablishment of Science.</title>
		<publication><I>George Mason Independent Law Review</I>, 3(2):305-350.</publication>
		<annotation>This essay examines how scientific misconduct is playing a pivotal role in defining the future state of science because it serves as a contact point between the institutions of science and those of the law. Specifically, due process procedures are driving social institutions of science away from their traditionally informal structure and toward a more rigid and formal structure reflecting that of legal institutions.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0125</record_number>
		<author>Baumrind, Diana.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Research Using Intentional Deception.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 40(2):165-74.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews ethical issues concerning intentional deception ten years after the publication of APA guidelines on research with human subjects, and concludes that the guidelines have not reduced intentional deception. Offers alternative research strategies for avoiding deception and for debriefing subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, POLICY, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0126</record_number>
		<author>Newman, Alan.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Research versus Animal Rights: Is There a Middle Ground?</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 77:135-137.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports on the rise of animal rights activism and its impact on researchers, including the development of alternatives to experimental use of animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0127</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Responsibilities of Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Federal Register</I>, 54(151):32446-32451.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, GOVERNMENT FUNDING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0128</record_number>
		<author>Shamoo, Adil E.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Role of Conflict of Interest in Scientific Objectivity: A Case of a Nobel Prize Work.</title>
		<publication><I>Accountability in Research</I>, 2:55-75.</publication>
		<annotation>Investigates research that led to the 1985 Nobel Prize in biology as an illustration of the lacking objectivity among leading scientists in their citations of direct competitors research. Calls for renewing the scientific ethos of cooperation and unselfish acknowledgment of others' work in the face of competition for public recognition, prizes and commercial gain.</annotation>
		<keywords>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, PEER REVIEW, BIOLOGY, CASE STUDIES, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, PUBLISHING, ACADEMIC ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0129</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J., and N. Wade.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Science's Faulty Fraud Detectors.</title>
		<publication><I>Psychology Today</I>, Nov. 1982: 51-57.</publication>
		<annotation>The author suggests that an ineffective three-tiered system of scientific self-correction is the source of increased fraud. The case of Marvin Spector illustrates the failure of replication, the third tier, in preventing scientific fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PEER REVIEW, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0130</record_number>
		<author>Burd, Gail D.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Science, Society and Ethics.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>An 8-week course outline designed to meet NIH ethics instruction requirements for pre-and postdoctoral trainees on training grants. Topics include: ethical decision-making, scientists and their political environment, fraud, whistle blowing, plagiarism, grant writing, and women and minorities in science. Bibliography and discussion guidelines included. Contact: Department of Anatomy and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Life Sciences South Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721.</annotation>
		<keywords>SYLLABUS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, FRAUD, WHISTLEBLOWING, PLAGIARISM, WOMEN, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0131</record_number>
		<author>Smith, R. J.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Scientific Fraud Probed at AAAS Meeting.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 228:1292.</publication>
		<annotation>A panel of academic officials and scientific journal editors agrees that incentives for prolific publishing reward unethical behavior.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0132</record_number>
		<author>Goodstein, David.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Scientific Fraud.</title>
		<publication><I>The American Scholar</I>, 60:505-515.</publication>
		<annotation>Gives examples of scientific fraud and history of federal regulations on scientific misconduct. The author argues that there is a difference between true fraud and harmless minor hypocrisies. In fact, he doubts that scientific progress would occur if all scientists rigorously adhered to proper scientific procedure at all times.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0133</record_number>
		<author>Smith, David H.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>Scientific Knowledge and Forbidden Truth.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report</I>, Vol. 8, No. 6(Dec.):30-34.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues against the implicit correlation in Western culture between scientific knowledge and virtue, and against the absolute right of scholars to freedom of inquiry. Sketches ways that knowledge may be immoral in use, acquisition, or impact, and advocates self-disciplined hesitation in publication of scientific findings.</annotation>
		<keywords>FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, VIRTUE, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, ACADEMIC ETHICS, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/11/1994</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0134</record_number>
		<author>Nigg, Herbert N., and Gabriela Radulescu.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Scientific Misconduct in Environmental Science and Toxicology.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association, </I> Vol. 272, No. 2(July 13):168-170.</publication>
		<annotation>Claims that scientific misconduct easily occurs in environmental science and toxicology and briefly describes four cases. Concludes that scientific misconduct may occur undetected across phyla, genera, and species; that distance from the publishing source makes detection more difficult; that editors and reviewers are not organized to take action against scientific misconduct; that plagiarized authors are likely to report plagiarism; and that there is only a small risk of censure from any source for authors engaging in scientific misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, PUBLISHING, PEER REVIEW, PLAGIARISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0135</record_number>
		<author>Alberts, Bruce, and Kenneth Shine.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Scientists and the Integrity of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 266:1660-1661.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0136</record_number>
		<author>Rosenberg, Steven A.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Secrecy in Medical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 334: 92-394.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0137</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Secret of the Wild Child</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: NOVA Star of Science Television/WGBH.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine, </I> Vol. 331, No.15 (Oct. 13, 1994):1030-1031. Follows the first five years of a 13-year-old girl's life after being freed from a home prison where she had been held since age 2. Raises issues involving the interrelations between professionals' personal needs, patient care and the demands of science.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, CHILDREN, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, CASE STUDIES, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>8/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0138</record_number>
		<author>Keith-Spiegel, Patricia, et al.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Sensitizing Undergraduate Students to the Nature, Causes, Scope and Consequences of Research Fraud: Preliminary Report.</title>
		<publication>American Psychological Association Division Two (Teaching) Executive Committee.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports results of survey completed by 65 undergraduate psychology majors who were asked to respond to a series of scenarios describing instances of research fraud. The survey was meant to assess the extent of students' sensitivity to misconduct in preparation for the development of a pamphlet to sensitize undergraduates to scientific values.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ON ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0139</record_number>
		<author>Fienberg, Stephen E., et al., eds.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Sharing Research Data.</title>
		<publication>National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics (Washington, DC: National Academy Press.)</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, SECRECY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0140</record_number>
		<author>Weil, Vivian, and Rachelle Hollander.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Sharing Scientific Data II: Normative Issues.</title>
		<publication><I>IRB</I>, 12:7-8.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, DATA MANAGEMENT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/10/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0141</record_number>
		<author>Fienberg, Stephen E.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Sharing Statistical Data in the Biomedical and Health Sciences: Ethical, Institutional, Legal, and Professional Dimensions.</title>
		<publication><I>Annual Review of Public Health</I>, 15:1-18.</publication>
		<annotation>Observes that the modern infrastructure of computer networking and the availability of cheap mass storage have removed many major barriers to data sharing. Article discusses the benefits and costs of data sharing and developments specific to data gathered and analyzed by health professionals and researchers.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DATA MANAGEMENT, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0142</record_number>
		<author>Brush, Stephen G.</author>
		<date>1974</date>
		<title>Should the History of Science Be Rated X?: The Way Scientists Behave (According to Historians) Might Not Be a Good Model for Students.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 183:1164-1172.</publication>
		<annotation>Explores the possible dangers of using the history of science in science education because the writings of contemporary science historians do violence to the professional ideal and public image of scientists as rational, open-minded investigators, proceeding methodically, grounded incontrovertibly in the outcome of controlled experiments, and seeking objectively the truth, let the chips fall where they may (p. 1164).</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0143</record_number>
		<author>Jensen, A. R.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>Sir Cyril Burt in Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 78:449-503.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that Cyril Burt's data anomalies are just human error.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0144</record_number>
		<author>Switzer, Robert L.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Six Case Studies.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Case studies with questions, appropriate for undergraduates, address conflicts of interest, fraud, authorship, sexual misconduct. Contact: Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, 61801.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FRAUD, AUTHORSHIP, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0145</record_number>
		<author>Kevles, Daniel J.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Social and Ethical Issues in the Human Genome Project.</title>
		<publication><I>National Forum</I>, 73:18-21.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0146</record_number>
		<author>Strikwerda, Robert A., and John Minor Ross.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Software and Ethical Softness.</title>
		<publication><I>Collegiate Microcomputer</I>, 10(3):129-136.</publication>
		<annotation>Analyzes ethical issues involved in the illegal use of software and presents empirical evidence suggesting the nature and scope of the problem.</annotation>
		<keywords>COMPUTERS, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0147</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1965</date>
		<title>Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority.</title>
		<publication><I>Human Relations</I>, 18:57-76.</publication>
		<annotation>Describes the famous Milgram experiments, which involved the deception of human subjects in order to test their willingness to inflict pain on other human beings in obedience to authority.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0148</record_number>
		<author>AAUP.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Statement on Multiple Authorship.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Sept.-Oct.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0149</record_number>
		<author>Sigma Xi.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Statement on the Use of Animals in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 80:73-76.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents Sigma Xi's recognition of the value of animals and their responsible use in scientific research based on three considerations: the importance for advancing scientific knowledge; the contributions to medical research, and to the study of ecology and environmental problems; and the presence of comprehensive guidelines to ensure humane treatment of animal subjects. Observes a distinction between animal rights (denied) and animal welfare (affirmed).</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0150</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Statement on the Use of Animals in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 80 (Jan./Feb.):73-76.</publication>
		<annotation>Following a request for commentary from all chapter and clubs of the Society, this statement reflects Sigma Xi's policy on the responsible use of animals in research, based on the assumption that well-conducted research with animals has provided, and continues to provide, information, ideas, and applications that can be obtained in no other way. Proposes limiting research using animals to that which is necessary, finding alternatives where feasible, and ensuring that animals do not suffer unnecessarily.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0151</record_number>
		<author>McDonald, C. S., and K. A. Peterson.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Teaching Commitment to Accuracy in Research: Comment on Cronan-Hillix.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 18:100-101.</publication>
		<annotation>Criticism of Cronan-Hillix's (1988, Teaching students the importance of accuracy in research,  <I>Teaching of Psychology, </I> 15, (205-207) policy of giving failing grades for research papers with even one error.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0152</record_number>
		<author>Sachs, Greg A., and Mark Siegler.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Teaching Scientific Integrity and the Responsible Conduct of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 68:871-875.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0153</record_number>
		<author>Gifford, Fred.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Teaching Scientific Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:297-314.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] addresses the concern about misconduct in research from another angle: an attempt to institute preventive measures via a pilot project in the education of scientists. He presents the first module in a program of scientific research ethics -- a case study concerning dilemmas over being less than truthful about the presentation of data, and a set of discussion questions -- to be used in small discussion groups of graduate students and postdoctorate fellows in the sciences. Reflection on the role of such an educational module in the science curriculum poses questions both about pedagogy and about whether or not such instruction concerning ethical problems can (and ought to) be viewed as internal to the scientific community. This last raises in a different way the issue of the socal contract between science and society.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TRUTHTELLING, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION, TEACHING ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0154</record_number>
		<author>Cronan-Hillix, T.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Teaching Students the Importance of Accuracy in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 15:205-207.</publication>
		<annotation>The author assigns failing grades to students whose results sections in research papers include even one error in order to drive home the point that attention to detail is critical. Students may correct and resubmit, but resubmitted papers are penalized one letter grade.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0155</record_number>
		<author>Cronan-Hillix, T.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Teaching Students the Importance of Accuracy in Research: A Reply to McDonald and Peterson.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 18:101-102.</publication>
		<annotation>Citing personal experience with their effective use, the author defends reward and punishment as tools for teaching students to pay attention to details in their research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0156</record_number>
		<author>Price, Alan R.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The 1993 ORI/AAAS Conference on Plagiarism and Theft of Ideas.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Information Ethics</I>, 3:54-63.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PUBLISHING, PLAGIARISM, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0157</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>The Betrayers.</title>
		<publication>London: Horizon/BBC.</publication>
		<annotation>Available from British Broadcasting Company, P.O. Box 7, London, W3 6XJ, England.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0158</record_number>
		<author>Donnelley, Strachan, et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Brave New World of Animal Biotechnology.</title>
		<publication>Special Supplement, <I>Hastings Center Report</I>, Vol. 24, No.1 (January-February).</publication>
		<annotation>A sequel to the earlier Animals, Science, and Ethics addressing three aspects of animal biotechnology: definitions of transgenic organisms and their applications in areas of health, commerce, and scientific research; ethical challenges to animal biotechnology and the contextual moral ecology of animal use in the wild, in scientific labs, in the marketplace, and on farms; and policies and regulations for the use of transgenic animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0159</record_number>
		<author>Cohen, Carl.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 315(14):865-869.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that animals have no rights and that speciesism is an inadequate rationale for prohibiting the use of animals in research. Concludes that alternatives should be utilized where possible but that animal research cannot be eliminated; the use of animals in research should be increased rather than decreased to avoid using humans as subjects; and that the perspectives of opponents to animal experimentation is seldom consistent.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0161</record_number>
		<author>Pfeifer, M.P., and G.L. Snodgrass.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 263:1420-1423.</publication>
		<annotation>A study comparing the number of citations for retracted articles vs. unquestioned articles.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>8/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0162</record_number>
		<author>Shapiro, David W., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 271(6):438-442.</publication>
		<annotation>Concludes, on the basis of survey results, that the core purposes of scientific authorship--to confer credit and denote responsibility for research--are not adequately met by current authorship practices.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ON ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0163</record_number>
		<author>Guston, David H.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Demise of the Social Contract for Science: Misconduct in Science and the Nonmodern World.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:215-248.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] places a careful accounting of recent events concerning scientific misconduct in a broad framework of science policy, political philosophy, and the social studies of science. He argues that the 'social contract for science, ' the view that 'the federal government provides funds for basic research in academia and agrees not to interfere with scientific decision-making, ' is an idea that the present crisis concerning scientific misconduct is causing to be fundamentally rethought (p. 213).</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0164</record_number>
		<author>DeGrazia, David.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>The Ethical Justification for Minimal Paternalism in the Use of the Predictive Test for Huntington's Disease.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 2(4):219-228.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0165</record_number>
		<author>Rosner, Fred, et. al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>The Ethics of Using Scientific Data Obtained by Immoral Means.</title>
		<publication><I>New York State Journal of Medicine</I>, 91(2): 34-139.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews three areas of research that have sparked the debate about using Nazi data; an EPE phosgene study, hypothermia research and use of Nazi victims' skeleton in anatomy classes. Indicates that at bioethics conferences consensus has not emerged, although authors claim Berger's (1990) discrediting of the data on scientific grounds should definitively end the debate. Points to the loopholes in ethical review of research reported in manuscripts submitted to medical journals.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0166</record_number>
		<author>Mazur, Alan.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>The Experience of Universities in Handling Allegations of Fraud or Misconduct in Research (excerpts).</title>
		<publication>in <I>Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: Report on Workshop Number Two, </I> AAAS-ABA Nat, Conf. of Lawyers and Scientists. Washington, D.C.: AAAS.</publication>
		<annotation>Summarizes eight highly-publicized cases of research fraud in the U.S. in the 1970's and '80's, suggesting the slowness and inadequacy of university investigations.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0167</record_number>
		<author>Lifton, Robert Jay.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>The Experimental Impulse.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide</I>. New York: Basic Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the biographies of doctors Carl Clauberg and Horst Schumann and their sterilization and castration experiments at Auschwitz in relationship to the broader Nazi biomedical vision.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, EUGENEICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0168</record_number>
		<author>Wright, David E.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Federal Research Misconduct Regulations as Viewed from the Research Universities.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:249-272.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] examines the process by which misconduct cases are investigated, from the perspective of those in a university administration. He fits the developments in policy concerning allegations of misconduct into a general model that applies as well to other instances of the federal regulation of scientific research. Amongst the many points put into relief from this perspective is that, while a certain sort of case initiates the process by which regulations are first created, a quite different sort of case becomes the prominent one to which these regulations end up being applied, requiring reinterpretation in the process (p. 213).</annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, POLICY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0169</record_number>
		<author>Sanders, Michael.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>The Forgotten Curriculum: An Argument for Medical Ethics Education.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274 (9): 68-769.</publication>
		<annotation>A plea for systematic ethics instruction as part of medical training, including an ethics question on the board and the establishment of ethics departments in medical schools.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0170</record_number>
		<author>Bebeau, Muriel J., and Stephen J. Thoma.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Impact of a Dental Ethics Curriculum on Moral Reasoning.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Dental Education</I>, 58:684-692.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0171</record_number>
		<author>Garfield, E., and A. Welljams-Doroff.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Impact of Fraudulent Research on the Scientific Literature: The Stephen E. Bruening Case.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 263:1424-1426.</publication>
		<annotation>Concludes that suspicion and/or official judgments of scientific misconduct or fraud are followed by decreases in citations.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PUBLISHING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0172</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>The Moral Status of Mice.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 43(6):473-474.</publication>
		<annotation>This short but poignant article develops a typology of mice to demonstrate how the same animals given different roles and labels in different settings receive different moral consideration, suggesting that the labels animals receive influence their moral status and treatment.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0173</record_number>
		<author>Sholiton, Faye.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>The Nazis and America.</title>
		<publication><I>Hadassah Magazine</I>, Aug./Sept.:14-15.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses viewpoints on both sides of the international debate among scientists, doctors, and ethicists over the ethics of reusing human subject research data collected by the Nazis.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0174</record_number>
		<author>Brobeck, Sonja.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Need for Better Ethical Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Curriculum and Supervision</I>, 5(Winter):194-200.</publication>
		<annotation>Briefly summarizes the development of regulations establishing standards for the treatment of human subjects in research. Argues for improved standards in such areas as researcher qualifications, specification of the characteristics of the particular group to be studied, improved methods of data collection and maintenance of the subject's privacy and anonymity of subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, PUBLISHING, DATA MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIALITY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0175</record_number>
		<author>Dworkin, Roger.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>The New Genetics.</title>
		<publication>In <I>BIOLAW: A Legal and Ethical Reporter on Medicine, Health Care and Bioengineering</I>, pp. 89-112. New York: University Publications of America.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an overview of the legal and ethical issues involved in genetic screening, including physician's obligations in genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and conveying information to the patient and others; state sponsored and mandatory employer screening; and genetic engineering and gene therapy.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC COUNSELING, EUGENICS, HUMAN GENE THERAPY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0176</record_number>
		<author>Croll, Roger.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title>The Noncontributing Author: An Issue of Credit and Responsibility.</title>
		<publication><I>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine</I>, 27:401-407.</publication>
		<annotation>Exposes inaccuracies in the assumption that all authors listed on a research article have contributed to the underlying research, discusses problems with current practices, and proposes changes that would require authors to have made significant contributions to the research and make them responsible for all aspects of the article.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0177</record_number>
		<author>Fishbach, Ruth L., and Diane C. Gilbert.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>The Ombudsman for Research Practice: A Proposal for a New Position and an Invitation to Comment.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, 1:389-402.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0178</record_number>
		<author>Macklin, Ruth.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>The Problem of Adequate Disclosure in Social Science Research.</title>
		<publication>in <i>Ethical Issues in Social Science Research</i>, edited by Tom Beauchamp, Ruth Faden, R. Jay Wallace, and LeRoy Walters, pp. 193-214. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Supports the application of federal regulations for the protection of human subjects to the social sciences as well as the medical sciences, arguing that the dangers of harm to human subjects and need for informed consent make the principles underlying such regulations, including respect for persons and a utilitarian weighing of social benefits against personal costs, equally applicable. Concludes that outright deception, withholding information relevant to the subject's decision to participate and disguised participant-observation are unethical.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, INFORMED CONSENT, DECEPTION, TRUTHTELLING, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0179</record_number>
		<author>Wiggins, Sandi, et al.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>The Psychological Consequences of Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 327(20):1402-1405.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/11/1994</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0180</record_number>
		<author>Whitely, William P., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Scientific Community's Response to Evidence of Fraudulent Publication: The Robert Slutsky Case.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 2(July 13):170-173.</publication>
		<annotation>Compares citations made to articles by an author known to have published fraudulent articles (Slutsky) to citations made to a set of control articles. Concludes that when alerted to the presence of fraudulent results in the literature, the scientific community responds by reducing the number of citations of the tainted articles. In the Slutsky case, general news articles and three reviews . . . were most effective and retractions were least effective in purging fraudulent results from the literature.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, FRAUD, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/1/1994</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0181</record_number>
		<author>Rennie, Drummond, and Annette Flanagin.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 2 (July 13):91.</publication>
		<annotation>Introduction to a special issue of the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> on peer review. Issue includes 26 papers.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0182</record_number>
		<author>Flanagan, M. F., and B. Robinson.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>The Secrecy Game Revisited.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 33:775-776.</publication>
		<annotation>Empirical support for Dunnette's (1966, <I>American Psychologist</I>, 21, 343-352) assertion that psychologists often fail to report significant pieces of information in their research articles. The author discusses implications for replication and validity assessment, and presents recommendations to correct secrecy.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, SECRECY, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0183</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Significance of Animal Suffering.</title>
		<publication><I>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</I>, 13(1):9-12.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that animals suffer, that their suffering is of moral consequence, and that there is no characteristic that makes humans universally more significant morally than animals. Concludes that speciesism -- the preferential treatment of humans over animals -- is not justified, and that we should instead consider the suffering of animals as on a moral par with our own.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0184</record_number>
		<author>Grady, Denise.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>The Ticking of a Time Bomb in the Genes.</title>
		<publication><I>Discover</I>, 8:26-35.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent general discussion of testing and notification for Huntington Disease, raising ethical issues of confidentiality and the right to know test results.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0185</record_number>
		<author>Miller, Neal.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>The Value of Behavioral Research on Animals.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>. 40(4):423-440.</publication>
		<annotation>Refutes the position of some animal rights activists that animal experimentation has been valueless by discussing the many varied contributions that animal experimentation has made to medicine and health, including benefits to animals, protection of people and crops, behavior therapy and medicine, stress and pain therapy, and learning and memory deficits.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>1/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0186</record_number>
		<author>Janis, Allen I.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Value of Scientific Failure.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Scientific Failure</I>, ed. Tamara Horowitz and Allen I. Janis, pp. 13-17. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>Since at least some scientific misconduct arises from researchers who fudge data to get the right answer, having students read this essay might lessen their temptation to fabricate data. The whole book underscores the important point that failure is part and parcel of the scientific enterprise, and apparent failure has often led to important scientific breakthroughs.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, TEACHING ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0187</record_number>
		<author>Office of Research Integrity (Research Integrity Branch, Office of the General Counsel).</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Whistleblower's Conditional Privilege to Report Allegations of Scientific Misconduct.</I></title>
		<publication>Office of Research Integrity, Suite 700, 5515 Security Lane, Rockville, MD 20852.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the Public Health Service's scientific misconduct regulation to protect whistleblowers who allege misconduct, in good faith. Specifically discusses principles of public and common interest, as well as self-interest on the part of the whistleblower. Also covers implications of abusing the privilege to report allegations.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0188</record_number>
		<author>O'Brien, Margaret, and Carol Levine.</author>
		<date>1980</date>
		<title>The XYY Controversy: Researching Violence and Genetics.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report, Special Supplement</I>:1-31.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes excerpts from two conferences on genetic determinants, violent behavior, and the ethics of research and research review, stemming from controversial research exploring whether men with an extra Y chromosome are more prone to violent behavior. Raises issues of researcher responsibility to subjects (especially regarding informed consent), to their families, and to society, as well as concerns about sloppy research and media responsibilities regarding reporting of controversial research.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, CRIME, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0189</record_number>
		<author>Carson, Ronald A.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Thinking about Case Stories.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5(4):347-348.</publication>
		<annotation>The author recommends presenting cases as narrated accounts to spur moral imagination. Comments on article by Kuczeweski et al. on pp. 310-315 of same issue.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0190</record_number>
		<author>Wingfield, Arthur.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Three Case Studies.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Case studies and discussion questions concerning use of human subjects in medical and psychological research are based on actual incidents publicized in the newspapers in past years. Contact: Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, P.O. Box 9110, Waltham, MA 02254.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0191</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter.</author>
		<date>1975</date>
		<title>Tools for Research ...or What the Public Doesn't Know It Is Paying For.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals</I>, pp. 27-91. New York: Avon Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues for the abolition of animal research. Uses the principle of equal consideration of interests -- that all sentient beings have the same stake in their own existence -- to argue that giving primacy to the interests of one species over another on any basis other than its capacity to suffer is illegitimate.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0192</record_number>
		<author>Fisch, Linc, and Carol L. Spence.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Trigger Films on College Teaching, Series E.</title>
		<publication>VHS videocassette produced by the University of Kentucky Offices of Media Design and Production and Instructional Telecommunications. May be ordered for $75 from Michelle Moss, Media Design and Production, University of Kentucky, 170 Taylor Education Bui</publication>
		<annotation>Presents case scenarios involving ethical issues in teaching. Comes with a discussion guide. Not available for rental.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, TEACHING, ACADEMIC ETHICS, VIDEO</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0193</record_number>
		<author>Bird, Stephanie J., and David E. Housman.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Trust and the Collection, Selection, Analysis and Interpretation of Data: A Scientist's View.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I> 1: 371-382.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, TRUST, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0194</record_number>
		<author>Barber, Bernard.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Trust in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Minerva</I> 25 (Spring/Summer):123-134.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the role of trust -- in both the senses of trustfuln