<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<root>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/8/1998</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0001</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Ethics Consultation.</title>
		<publication><I>Trends in Health Care, Law and Ethics</I>, Vol. 8, No. 4 (Fall, 1993).</publication>
		<annotation>A special issue containing six articles on ethics consultation: The Legitimation of Ethics Consultation,  by Russell L. McIntyre; A Pro-Active Role for the Ethics Committee or Ethics Consultant,  by George A. Kanoti; Here Come the Ethicists! by Giles R. Scofield; A Nurse-Ethicist Model of Ethics Consultation,  by Patricia A. Murphy; and Can Ethics Consultation be Gender Neutral? by Sandra J. Taylor.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS CONSULTATION, GENDER</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/5/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0002</record_number>
		<author>Weisburd, Dan E., and Vera Hassner, ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Ethics in Neurobiological Research with Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the California Alliance for the Mentally Ill</I>, 5(1):1-70.</publication>
		<annotation>Special issue looking at ethical issues involved in doing research using mentally ill subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FRAUD, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH WITH PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPAIRED, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0003</record_number>
		<author>Blackhall, Leslie J. et al.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Ethnicity and Attitudes toward Patient Autonomy.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274:820-825.</publication>
		<annotation>The authors surveyed 200 elderly subjects who identified themselves as being European American, African American, Korean American or Mexican American. Ethnicity was the strongest predictor of attitudes toward truthtelling and patient decision making. Korean American and Mexican American subjects were less likely to believe that a patient should be told of a terminal prognosis and that a patient should make decisions about the use of life-supporting technology. Instead, they tended to believe that the family should make such decisions. Implications for physician-patient communication are discussed. There are several response letters to this article in JAMA 275(2):107-110.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, TRUTHTELLING, MINORITY POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0004</record_number>
		<author>Knight, J. A.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title>Exploring the Compromise of Ethical Principles in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine</I>, 27:432-441.</publication>
		<annotation>Suggests that pressures to obtain grants, meet high social expectations and achieve success may tempt scientists to commit research fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0005</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J.</author>
		<date>1981</date>
		<title>Fraud and the Structure of Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>. 212:37-41.</publication>
		<annotation>Lack of replication and a professional immunity from scrutiny prevent protection against scientific fraud. However, it may be that fraud is not increasing, but rather that it is being reported with greater frequency because of increased self-policing in today's competitive environment.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PEER REVIEW, SCIENCE RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, WHISTLEBLOWING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0006</record_number>
		<author>Gustafson, James.</author>
		<date>1973</date>
		<title>Genetic Counseling and the Uses of Genetic Knowledge -- An Ethical Overview.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Ethical Issues in Human Genetics</I>, edited by Bruce Hilton, et al., pp. 101-112. New York: Plenum Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A philosophical treatment of the ethical issues involved in genetic counseling relating to genetically-impaired fetuses. Poses the central issue as whether the individual or the community should have primacy in ethical considerations. Discusses the tension between individual rights-based approaches and consequentialist ones, and proposes the need for agreement on minimal objectives about the evils to be avoided in genetic screening.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC COUNSELING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, GENETIC SCREENING, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0007</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title><I>Genetic Gamble</I>.</title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Explores the technical and ethical problems of applying breakthroughs in genetic engineering to the curing of inherited human disease. Examines research aimed at altering an individual's genetic code through insertion of gene sequences for missing enzymes into somatic cells. Illustrates the serious moral and ethical concerns raised by human genetics experimentation.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, VIDEO, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN GENE THERAPY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0008</record_number>
		<author>Lewis, Ricki.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Genetic Marker Testing: Are We Ready for It?</title>
		<publication><I>Issues in Science and Technology</I>, 4(1):76-82.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent discussion of some ethical issues surrounding genetic marker testing, including confidentiality, privacy, public welfare, and the rights of minors and employers.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, CONFIDENTIALITY, CHILDREN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0009</record_number>
		<author>Kolata, Gina.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Genetic Screening Raises Questions for Employers and Insurers.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 232: 17-319.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the range of issues raised by genetic screening, including testing young children, the privacy interests of employees, and the economic interests of employers and insurers to have genetic information. Provides background on the development of genetic screening technology in the workplace.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/14/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0010</record_number>
		<author>Baum, Rudy.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Genetic Screening: Medical Promise among Legal and Ethical Questions.</title>
		<publication><I>Chemical and Engineering News</I>, 67:10-16.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent overview of genetic screening, how RFLP analysis works, and the relevant ethical issues, particularly mandatory screening in employment and prenatal context.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0011</record_number>
		<author>Murray, Thomas.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Genetic Testing at Work: How Should It Be Used?</title>
		<publication><I>Technology Review</I>, 88(4):51-59.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an in-depth discussion of the moral issues raised in genetic testing at work. Distinguishes between genetic screening and monitoring, summarizes significant screening programs that have been instituted for PKU and sickle-cell anemia, the purposes of genetic screening and monitoring in the workplace, and the legal implications of screening programs.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC SCREENING, LAW, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0012</record_number>
		<author>Hayes, Catherine V.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Genetic Testing for Huntington's Disease -- A Family Issue.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 327(20):1449-1451.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0013</record_number>
		<author>Macrina, Francis L., and Cindy L. Munro.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Graduate Teaching in Principles of Scientific Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 68:879-884.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, TEACHING, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0014</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Guarding the Guardians: Research on Editorial Peer Review.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 263.</publication>
		<annotation>A special issue of JAMA.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0015</record_number>
		<author>Mitchell, Graham.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Guarding the Middle Ground: The Ethics of Experiments on Animals.</title>
		<publication><I>Current Contents</I>, 22:6-13.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that use of ethics committees is the best means to mediate between the conflicting interests of researchers desiring to use animals in research and anti-vivisectionists.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0016</record_number>
		<author>Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (COSEPUP).</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Handling Allegations of Misconduct in Science--Institutional Responses and Experience.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process.</I>, Vol. I. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the growing interaction and continuing unresolved issues between universities, the government, and the courts since the 1980's in policy implementation and investigation concerning scientific misconduct and fraud. Proposes a single independent review organization for handling misconduct and fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, POLICY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0017</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Harvard Delays in Reporting Fraud.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 215:478-482.</publication>
		<annotation>A critical account of the way in which Harvard University handled the fraud case of Dr. John Darsee.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0018</record_number>
		<author>McCormick, Richard A.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Hidden Persuaders: Value Variables in Bioethics.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions.</publication>
		<annotation>Monograph explores the cultural assumptions, or value variables,  that influence bioethical thought and health care planning in general, including: the denial of mortality, the eugenic mentality, rescue medicine, the absolutization of autonomy and dignity as independence.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, EUGENICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0019</record_number>
		<author>Burman, Kenneth.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>'Hanging from the Masthead': Reflections on Authorship.</title>
		<publication><I>Annals of Internal Medicine</I>, 97:602-605.</publication>
		<annotation>Criticizes the general practice of multiple authorship of research articles, which does not accurately represent actual involvement in the underlying research or writing.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0020</record_number>
		<author>La Puma, John</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>'How Much Do You Get If I Volunteer?': Suggested Institutional Policy on Reward, Consent, and Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Hospital and Health Services Administration</I>, 392:193-203.</publication>
		<annotation>Suggests a model policy and guidelines for the ethical conduct of post-marketing research on new drugs by practicing physicians.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICES, INFORMED CONSENT, COMPENSATION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0021</record_number>
		<author>Coppola, Brian P., and David H. Smith.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>A Case for Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Chemical Education</I>, 73(1):33-34.</publication>
		<annotation>The first author is a practicing chemist; the second an ethicist. Argues for an explicit ethical perspective in science education and offers three instructional objectives: the development of character, the development of cognitive skills, and the development of disciplinary skills.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CHEMISTRY, TEACHING, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0022</record_number>
		<author>Sprague, Robert.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>A Case of Whistleblowing in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Perspectives on the Professions</I> 8:4-5.</publication>
		<annotation>A brief account of the author's experiences in blowing the whistle on the research misconduct of then-colleague Stephen Breuning.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, SCIENCE RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0023</record_number>
		<author>Wright, N. D.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>A Citation Context Analysis of Retracted Scientific Articles.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.</publication>
		<annotation>This dissertation looked at whether published retractions of articles (1963-1987) either because of error or scientific misconduct decreased citations to them. The author found a significant difference between the number of pre- and post-retraction citations, but 90% of remaining citations were positive.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0024</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, P. J.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>A Last Call for Self-Regulation of Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 64:502-504.</publication>
		<annotation>Several suggestions are made to improve the climate within which scientific research takes place, including formal institutional oversight and active faculty involvement in setting standards.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0025</record_number>
		<author>Petersdorf, R. G.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title>A Matter of Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 64:199-123.</publication>
		<annotation>Medical fraud and misconduct are suggested to be the result of hypercompetitive premedical and medical school environments.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FRAUD, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0026</record_number>
		<author>The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>A Novel Gene Containing a Trinucleotide Repeat That Is Expanded and Unstable on Huntington's Disease Chromosomes.</title>
		<publication><I>Cell</I>, 72:971-983.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0027</record_number>
		<author>Kalichman, M. W., and P. J. Friedman.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>A Pilot Study of Biomedical Trainees' Perceptions Concerning Research Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 67:769-765 (?).</publication>
		<annotation>Presents survey results in which biomedical trainees were asked about their perceptions of unethical research practices and their exposure to research ethics instruction.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0028</record_number>
		<author>Rest, James R.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>A Psychologist Looks at the Teaching of Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report</I>, pp. 29-36.</publication>
		<annotation>Proposes that psychological researchers and ethics instructors collaborate, so as to locate ethics instruction in a moral development framework and to refine evaluation of student processes and progress in ethical decision-making.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, PSYCHOLOGY, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>4/4/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0029</record_number>
		<author>Center for Applied Ethics.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Academic Integrity: The Bridge to Professional Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Durham, NC: Center for Applied Ethics, School of Engineering, Duke University.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, MISCONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0030</record_number>
		<author>Smith, Steven, and Deborah Richardson.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title>Amelioration of Deception and Harm in Psychological Research: The Important Role of Debriefing.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</I>, 44(5):1075-1082.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports on the effects of deception and harm on research participants in psychology experiments, based on the perceptions of 464 undergraduate students enrolled in psychology courses. Approximately 20 percent of the subjects reported harm, but there was no correlation between deception and perception of harm. The authors also consider the role of debriefing in eliminating negative effects for those participants who perceived they had been harmed, and concludes participation as research subjects may be beneficial.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGY, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0031</record_number>
		<author>Wertz, Dorothy, and John Fletcher, eds.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>An International Survey of Attitudes of Medical Geneticists toward Mass Screening and Access to Results.</title>
		<publication><I>Public Health Reports</I>, 35(10):104.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses genetic researchers' attitudes about patients' rights to information and to confidentiality about the results of screening tests for genetic diseases.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0032</record_number>
		<author>Morrison, Adrian R.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Animal Rights Philosophy Versus Biological Reality.</title>
		<publication><I>Iowa State University Veterinarian</I>, 58(1):10-17.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides a brief overview of Peter Singer's utilitarian and Tom Regan's rights-based objections to animal research and challenges their understanding of the status of animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0033</record_number>
		<author>Donnelly, Strachan, and Kathleen Nolan, eds.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Animals, Science, and Ethics.</title>
		<publication>Special Supplement, <I>Hastings Center Report</I>, Vol. 20, No. 3 (May/June).</publication>
		<annotation>An informative, in-depth discussion of the ethical implications of the use of animals in research. Contents include an introductory overview; summary of applicable ethical theories and their usefulness applied to animals; consideration of rationales used to justify using animals in science and how to best determine animal suffering; overview of animal care and use committees and review procedures; and discussion of policy issues relating to the use of animals in research, testing, and education.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, POLICY, RESEARCH ETHICS, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0034</record_number>
		<author>Gallup, Gordon, and Jason Beckstead.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Attitudes toward Animal Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 43(6):474-476.</publication>
		<annotation>Summarizes results of survey on animal research conducted with 263 undergraduate students on animal research. Survey revealed that 76% expressed concern about pain and suffering in animals, yet 81% preferred to see animals used in research rather than humans die or suffer from disease, 66.9% agreed that drugs and surgical procedures should be tested on animals before being administered to humans, and 62% believed some animal research is necessary.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0035</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Derek.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Balancing Responsibility and Innovation.</title>
		<publication><I>Change</I>, 14:16-25.</publication>
		<annotation>An excellent discussion of the issues faced by a university attempting to negotiate technology transfer and control the growth and direction of its relationship with industry.</annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0036</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1963</date>
		<title>Behavioral Study of Obedience.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology</I>, 6(4): 371-378.</publication>
		<annotation>Milgram reports study results.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0037</record_number>
		<author>LaFollette, Marcel C.</author>
		<date>1988-89.</date>
		<title>Beyond Plagiarism: Ethical Misconduct in Scientific and Technical Publishing.</title>
		<publication><I>Book Research Quarterly</I>, 4: 65-73.</publication>
		<annotation>Analyzes the growing problem of scientific misconduct from a historical perspective, tracing changes in the nature of the scientific community from World War II, and the growing involvement of the government in research, including regulation.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, PLAGIARISM, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0038</record_number>
		<author>Handyside, A.H., et al.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Birth of a Normal Girl after In Vitro Fertilization and Preimplantation Diagnostic Testing for Cystic Fibrosis.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 327:905-909.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, GYNECOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0039</record_number>
		<author>Paul, Diane.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>A History of the Eugenics Movement and of Its Multiple Effects on Public Policy.</title>
		<publication><I>Scientific American</I>, 254:27-31.</publication>
		<annotation>Book Review of Daniel Kevles, <I>In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity</I>. Generally positive review of Kevles' historical treatment of eugenics, particularly his consideration of how that history can inform current policymakers about the social benefits and pitfalls of individual reproductive decisions. The review discusses the difficulty of defining eugenics and criticizes both the appropriateness of Kevles' sharp distinction between old and newer eugenics movements and his portrayal of the historical figures involved as good guys and bad guys.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, HISTORY, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0040</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Derek C.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Can Ethics Be Taught?</title>
		<publication><I>Change</I>, Oct.:26-30.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0041</record_number>
		<author>McAskie, M.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>Carelessness or Fraud in Sir Cyril Burt's Kinship Data?: A Critique of Jensen's Analysis.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 72:496-497.</publication>
		<annotation>Replies to Jensen (1978, Sir Cyril Burt in Perspective,  <I>American Psychologist</I>, 78 (449-503), disputing that Burt's actions reflected mere carelessness.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0042</record_number>
		<author>Hanson, Shirley.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Collaborative Research and Authorship Credit: Beginning Guidelines.</title>
		<publication><I>Nursing Research</I>. 37:49-52.</publication>
		<annotation>Synthesizes a number of studies on collaborative research and multiple authorship to derive a number of practical principles for how to proceed with such research.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0043</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Conflicts of Interests: Kittens and Boa Constrictors, Pets and Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 45(3):246-248.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that even seemingly benign relations with animals, namely, keeping carnivorous animals as pets, raises some of the same questions as the use of animals in scientific research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0044</record_number>
		<author>Ulrich, Roger.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Animal Rights, Animal Wrongs, and the Question of Balance.</title>
		<publication><I>Psychological Science</I>, 2(3):197-201.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues for balance in the use and treatment of animals, contending that both the anti-vivisectionists and the researchers who conduct experimentation with animals are guilty of excesses.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEACH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0045</record_number>
		<author>Fischbach, Ruth, and Lynn Peterson.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Conflict of Interest Case.</title>
		<publication>The Program in the Practice of Scientific Investigation, Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes teaching notes. Contact Ruth Fischbach, Co-Director (with Lynn Peterson), The Program in the Practice of Scientific Investigation, Division of Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School, 643 Huntington Ave., Boston, MA 02115.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0046</record_number>
		<author>Council of Biology Editors, Editorial Policy Committee. John C. Bailar III, Chair.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Conflicts of Interest.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication</I>, p. 32. Bethesda: Council of Biology Editors, Inc. p. 32.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BIOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0047</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Confronting the Killer Gene</I>.</title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines the implications of a new laboratory test that can detect the presence of Huntington Disease, a hereditary disorder characterized by nervous deterioration and certain death. Focuses on four individuals, including well-known musician Arlo Guthrie, who are all faced with a decision: to test or not to test.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, VIDEO, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0048</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, P. J.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Correcting the Literature Following Fraudulent Publication.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 263, No. 10(Mar. 9):1416-1419.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0049</record_number>
		<author>Charon, Rita, and Renee C. Fox.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Critiques and Remedies: Medical Students Call for Change in Ethics Teaching.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274(9):767, 771.</publication>
		<annotation>Medical students' essays highlight pitfalls in their professional socialization and their desire for ongoing mentoring relationships with mature physician-teachers who could model ethical medical practice.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, MENTORING, BIOEMEDICAL ETHICS, TEACHING ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0050</record_number>
		<author>Brown, A. S., and D. R. Murphy.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Cryptomnesia: Delineating Inadvertent Plagiarism.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Experimental Psychology</I>, 15:432-442.</publication>
		<annotation>Explains the phenomenon of cryptomnesia, which is being used as a defense in scientific plagiarism cases. Cryptomnesia is the presence of a memory in one's consciousness that is not recognized as such, but is experienced as a new phenomenon.</annotation>
		<keywords>PLAGIARISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0051</record_number>
		<author>Freedland, K. E., and R. M. Carney.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Data Management and Accountability in Behavioral and Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 47:640-645.</publication>
		<annotation>Errors in obtaining and storing data in computer systems may occur because of honest mistakes or carelessness. The authors support mandated guidelines for record keeping and data storage and instruction in data management skills.</annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0052</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Health; Office of Health Planning and Evaluation; and Office of Scientific Integrity Review.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Data Management in Biomedical Research: Report of a Workshop.</I></title>
		<publication></publication>
		<annotation>Provides useful discussion on issues of data ownership, sharing, and retention.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, SECRECY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0053</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Data Sharing: A Declining Ethic?</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 248:952-957.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0054</record_number>
		<author>Woolf, Patricia.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Deception in Scientific Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Jurimetrics Journal</I>, 29(Fall):67-95.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an interesting discussion of misconduct in research, including a summary of a number of fairly recent cases, how they were dealt with, and how the wrongdoers were disciplined.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>4/4/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0055</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Decoding the Book of Life</I>.</title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Portrays the history of the Human Genome Project, placed in the context of the eugenics movement, development of genetic screening, treatment of genetic disease, and the choices that will need to be made regarding the use of molecular genetic techniques in human breeding.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, VIDEO, EUGENEICS, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0056</record_number>
		<author>Ben-Yehuda, N.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Deviance in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>The British Journal of Criminology</I>, 26:1-27.</publication>
		<annotation>Uses case examples to explain how several characteristics of the scientific community--including lack of replication and suppression of investigations--may lead to misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, SECRECY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0057</record_number>
		<author>Bechtel, H. K., and W. Pearson.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Deviant Scientists and Scientific Deviance.</title>
		<publication><I>Deviant Behavior</I>, 6:237-252.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at scientific fraud from three sociological perspectives of deviance, presenting it as an elite occupational deviance legitimized by the increasingly business-like approach to science.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/9/1997</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0058</record_number>
		<author>Anderson, Melissa S., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Disciplinary and Departmental Effects on Observations of Faculty and Graduate Student Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Higher Education</I>, 65(3):331-350.</publication>
		<annotation>Part of the Acadia Institute's Project on Professional Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Examines the effects of departmental and disciplinary contexts (specifically departmental structure, departmental climate, and discipline) on graduate students' exposure to three forms of misconduct: research, employment, and personal.</annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0059</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Discussing Animal Rights and Animal Research in the Classroom.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 17:90-94.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews utilitarian and rights arguments for animal liberation, presents a classroom exercise involving four cases which students decide as members of an Animal Care and Use Committee, and reports that students' participating in the exercise raised their awareness of the issue and its complexity.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CASE STUDIES, ETHICAL THEORY, TEACHING ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0060</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>Do Scientists Cheat?</I></title>
		<publication>Northbrook, IL: Coronet Film and Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines why scientific fraud is so hard to detect and details the numerous factors that influence fraud, including an increasing competition for grant money and tenured positions. Discusses why scientists may be less than honest, analyzes how our scientific system deals with quality control, and considers the adequacy of the scientific community's response when a researcher is involved in fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, TRUTHTELLING, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0061</record_number>
		<author>Dewsbury, Donald.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Early Interactions between Animal Psychologists and Animal Activists and the Founding of the APA Committee on Precautions in Animal Experimentation.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, Mar. 1990:315-327.</publication>
		<annotation>Demonstrates that the contemporary conflict between animal psychologists is not new but dates back to the Victorian antivivisectionist movement, and discusses the effects of the early controversy.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, PSYCHOLOGY, HISTORY, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0062</record_number>
		<author>Clingerman, Karen.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Ethical and Moral Issues Relating to Animals 1979-1988.</title>
		<publication>Quick Bibliography Series. Beltsville, MD: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture.</publication>
		<annotation>Contains short annotations of 270 works.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0063</record_number>
		<author>Sieber, Joan E., and Barbara Stanley.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Ethical and Professional Dimensions of Socially Sensitive Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 43(4):49-55.</publication>
		<annotation>Proposes a taxonomy of ethical analysis for considering the ethical dimensions of socially sensitive research, both in the formulation of the research question, as well as in the conduct of the research and treatment of subjects. The taxonomy covers considerations of privacy, confidentiality, sound and valid methodology, deception, informed consent, justice and equitable treatment, scientific freedom, ownership of data, the values of epistemology of social scientists, and risk/benefit ratio.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, CONFIDENTIALITY, HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, INFORMED CONSENT, DATA MANAGEMENT, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0064</record_number>
		<author>Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title><I>Ethical Dilemmas in Research.</I></title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation><I>Five scenarios presented in script form, with minimal narrative background, address problems of collaboration and authorship, plagiarism, and falsification of data. These are possibly more effective if play-acted rather than simply read individually. Contact: Nine Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142</I></annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, PLAGIARISM, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, AUTHORSHIP, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH DATA, FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/1/1994</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0065</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Ethical Guidelines to Publication of Chemical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Chemical Society</I>, 116(13):8A-10A.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes guidelines on the ethical obligations of editors of scientific journals, of authors, of reviewers, and of scientists publishing outside of scientific literature.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, PUBLISHING, CHEMISTRY, PEER REVIEW, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0066</record_number>
		<author>Mertzman, Robert, and Peter Madsen.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Professional Life: A Multimedia Course.</title>
		<publication>Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.</publication>
		<annotation>A text chapter and distance education video address the role of science in contemporary society, and types and incidences of scientific misconduct and whistleblowing. The text includes an historical overview of the issues by Philosopher of Science, Steven Turner. The video features Dr. Robert L. Sprague, Professor of Psychology and Medicine.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, HISTORY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0067</record_number>
		<author>Goldman, Alan.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Proprietary Restrictions on Research Results.</title>
		<publication><I>Science, Technology, and Human Values</I>, 12:22-30.</publication>
		<annotation>A sophisticated analysis of the value issues surrounding patents in the academic context. Provides a sound analysis of the arguments for and against patent ownership by faculty researchers.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH ETHICS, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0068</record_number>
		<author>Garfield, Sol.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Research on Psychotherapy.</title>
		<publication><I>Counseling and Values</I>, 31(2):115-125.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses differences in attitude about treatment of human subjects in research vs. therapy, the ethical problems with nontreatment control groups, and proposed solutions to these problems.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0069</record_number>
		<author>Graedon, Joe D., moderator and Harvey C. Krasny, director.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Scientific Research: A Public Forum</I>.</title>
		<publication>The Research Triangle Park Club of Sigma Xi, P.O. Box 13416, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 800/768-4336 or 803/269-7744.</publication>
		<annotation>Panel discussion of hypothetical cases on authorship, peer review, data management, social responsibility, fraud and research communication.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, AUTHORSHIP, DATA MANAGEMENT, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, PEER REVIEW, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0070</record_number>
		<author>Campbell, Donald.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in the Research Publication Process.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Ethical Dilemmas for Academic Professionals</I>, edited by S.L. Payne and B.H. Charnov, pp. 69-85. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.</publication>
		<annotation>A general overview of a number of issues involved in publishing research, including plagiarism, multiple authorship, public review process, faculty obligations to students, and distortion of findings.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PLAGIARISM, AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0071</record_number>
		<author>Swazey, Judith P. et al.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Ethical Problems in Academic Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 81:543-553.</publication>
		<annotation>Part of the Acadia Institute's Project on Professional Values and Ethical Issues in the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Surveys doctoral candidates and faculty in 100 departments of chemistry, civil engineering, microbiology, and sociology and finds substantial exposure to three areas of ethical problems: misconduct (including fabrication, falsification and plagiarism); questionable research practices (including poor research records and honorary authorship); and other misconduct,  such as sexual harassment and violation of governmental regulations. Analyzes the variations across discipline, and indicates need to rethink bad apple theory of misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ACADEMIC ETHICS, CHEMISTRY, BIOLOGY, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, DATA MANAGEMENT, SCIENCE RESEARCH, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, FRAUD, PALGIARISM, AUTHORSHIP, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ENGINEERGING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0072</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, Paul J.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Ethical Problems in Research for Discussion and Problems for Administrators.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Two sets of brief case studies (17 in all), dealing with issues of authorship, intellectual property, plagiarism, and fabrication of data, are presented as examples of the controversies with which university administrators will need to be prepared to deal. Contact: School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, 92037.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, AUTHORSHIP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PALGIARISM, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0073</record_number>
		<author>Zak, Steven.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Ethics and Animals.</title>
		<publication><I>The Atlantic Monthly</I>, 263(3):68-74.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the so-called radical views of contemporary animal rights groups relative to the past, considers differences between virtue and rights approaches to the ethical treatment of animals, showing how the former inadequately protects animals, and concludes that legal recognition of animals' rights is necessary to their adequate protection.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0074</record_number>
		<author>Feeney, Dennis.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Human Rights and Animal Welfare.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 47(6): 593-597.</publication>
		<annotation>A defense of animal experimentation written by a researcher crippled by incurable paraplegia. Critiques the antivivisectionist movement for neglecting the suffering of humans caused by failure to experiment on animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0075</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Human Rights and Child Health.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 27(4):565.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CHILDREN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0076</record_number>
		<author>Loeb, Jerod.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Human vs. Animal Rights.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of American Medicine</I>, 262(19).</publication>
		<annotation>Condensed version of the American Medical Association's detailed analysis of the controversy over the use of animals in research, including reports on the destructive and violent actions of animal rights activist movements and discussion of the consequences for research if the activists prevail.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0077</record_number>
		<author>Wong, P. T.</author>
		<date>1981</date>
		<title>Implicit Editorial Policies and the Integrity of Psychology as an Empirical Science.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 690:692.</publication>
		<annotation>Author suggests that editorial practices may encourage fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PSYCHOLOGY, FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0078</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise and Political Influence in Scientific Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Technology Review</I> 96(Feb.-Mar.):69.</publication>
		<annotation>A review of the book by Robert Bell by the same title.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0079</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, Paul J.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Integrity in Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine, </I>, 68, Supplement 3.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0080</record_number>
		<author>Branscomb, Lewis.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Integrity in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 73:421-423.</publication>
		<annotation>A personal perspective on the costs that researchers' lack of integrity and honesty -- often in the form of honest mistakes with data -- has on the scientific community as a whole. Calls for commitment to quality and integrity among young scientists, career gatekeepers (e.g. tenure committees), and journal editors and working scientists.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, TRUTHTELLING, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/20/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0081</record_number>
		<author>Krulwich, Terry Ann, and Paul J. Friedman.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Integrity in the Education of Researchers.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 68(9).</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0082</record_number>
		<author>Zatz, Joel.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Intellectual Property: An Academician's Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education</I>, 53:346-350.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent general background to the issues surrounding patents in the academic context, including faculty research support, publication, students, record-keeping, and confidentiality.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, CONFIDENTIALITY, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0083</record_number>
		<author>Shaw, Margery.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Testing for the Huntington Gene: A Right to Know, a Right Not to Know, or a Duty to Know.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Medical Genetics</I>, 26: 243-246.</publication>
		<annotation>This brief article succinctly discusses the ethical problems surrounding patients's rights to obtain and to refuse knowledge after presymptomatic testing for Huntington Disease, part of a necessary program to eliminate the Huntington gene from the human species.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0084</record_number>
		<author>Capron, Alexander.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Is Consent Always Necessary in Social Science Research?</title>
		<publication>in <I>Ethical Issues in Social Science Research</I>, edited by Tom Beauchamp, Ruth Faden, R. Jay Wallace, and LeRoy Walters, pp. 215-231. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that informed consent may not be necessary in social science research when there are other means to fulfill its underlying purposes, including the promotion of autonomy and the protection of privacy.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/11/1994</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0085</record_number>
		<author>Altman, Douglas G., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Is There a Case for an International Medical Scientific Press Council?</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 272, No. 2 (July 13):166-167.</publication>
		<annotation>Briefly presents three cases of authors who believe they have been dealt with unfairly by editors and suggests that the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors turn its attention to editorial misconduct and explore possible procedures for allowing authors' grievances to be heard and for possible sanctions if complaints are upheld.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, CASE STUDIES, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/8/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0086</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Is There Intelligent (Animal) Life on Earth?</title>
		<publication><I>Dogs Annual</I>, pp. 144-147.</publication>
		<annotation>For too long, science has dismissed the possibility that animals think. It's time to ask not 'if, ' but 'how.'</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0087</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1964</date>
		<title>Issues in the Study of Obedience: A Reply to Baumrind.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 19:848-852.</publication>
		<annotation>Milgram responds to criticism of his studies.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0088</record_number>
		<author>Robertson, John A.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Legal Issues in Genetic Testing, </title>
		<publication>in <I>The Genome, Ethics and the Law: Issues in Genetic Testing</I>, pp. 79-110. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0089</record_number>
		<author>Relman, A. S.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title>Lessons from the Darsee Affair.</title>
		<publication><I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 208:1415-1417.</publication>
		<annotation>The author suggests that the Darsee case indicates that science is not self-correcting. Recommendations to prevent fraud are presented.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0090</record_number>
		<author>Jones, Anne Hudson.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Literature as Mirror or Lamp?: Commentary on 'Literature, Medical Ethics, and 'Epiphanic Knowledge'''.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5:4:340-341.</publication>
		<annotation>Short commentary that provides background information on the critique of principle-based medical ethics and the recent use of narrative and dramatic literature to complement analytic medical ethics. Comments on article by Anne Hunsaker Hawkins on pp. 283-290 of same issue.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0091</record_number>
		<author>Hawkins, Anne Hunsaker.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Literature, Medical Ethics, and 'Epiphanic Knowledge'.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5(4)283-290.</publication>
		<annotation>The author argues that the insights that lyric poetry provides and the faculties it engages provide a needed complement to the philosophy-based ethics that dominates today's medical ethical discourse.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0092</record_number>
		<author>Kuczewski, Mark, et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Make My Case: Ethics Teaching and Case Presentations.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5(4):310-315.</publication>
		<annotation>The authors recommend real-life cases for teaching ethical problem solving. They explore the specific educational needs of two groups--medical students and health-care professionals--and offer guidelines for making oral and written case presentations.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0093</record_number>
		<author>Olmstead, Marjorie A.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Mentoring New Faculty: Advice to Department Chairs.</title>
		<publication>in <I>CSWP</I>, a newsletter of the Committee on the Status of Women in Physics of The American Physical Society, Vol. 14, No., 1, pp. 1, 8-11.</publication>
		<annotation>Paper originally prepared for an invited talk at a 1993 conference of physics chairs; presents suggestions for increasing the chances of success for new faculty members.</annotation>
		<keywords>MENTORING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0094</record_number>
		<author>Waxman, Merle.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Mentoring, Role Modeling, and the Career Development of Junior Science Faculty.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of College Science Teaching</I>, 22:124-127.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>MENTORING, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0095</record_number>
		<author>Djerassi, Carl.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Mentoring: A Cure for Science Bashing?</title>
		<publication><I>Chemical and Engineering News</I>, 69 (Nov. 25):30-33.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>MENTORING, CHEMISTRY, ENGINEERING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0096</record_number>
		<author>Van de Kamp, J., and M. M. Cummings.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title><I>Misconduct and Fraud In the Life Sciences.</I></title>
		<publication>National Library of Medicine Literature Search 87-14. Order by sending a stamped, self-addressed envelope to: Literature Search Program, Referee Section, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.</publication>
		<annotation>Citiations about deception and misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, MISCONDUCT, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0097</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Misconduct in Science and Engineering.</title>
		<publication><I>Federal Register</I>, 56(May 14):22287-22290.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, ENGINEERING, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0098</record_number>
		<author>Roberts, Leslie.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Misconduct: Caltech's Trial by Fire.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 253:1344-47.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports investigations into allegations of scientific fraud by two biology postdocs at Caltech. The article and subsequent letters from key players raise the important issues of due process and the need for external investigating committees, as well as the potential need for a course addressing scientific misconduct for new graduate students, and the responsibility of the laboratory chief in establishing ethical lab conditions.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, BIOLOGY, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, TEACHING ETHICS, MISCONDUCT, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0099</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, P. J.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Mistakes and Fraud in Medical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Law, Medicine, and Health Care</I>, 20:17-25.</publication>
		<annotation>In cases of research misconduct, a balance must be struck between the acceptance of common, petty deception and protecting scientists from guardians of purity,  while protecting the public from research fraud. Presents a spectrum of scientific misrepresentation with petty deception at one end and fraud on the other.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/8/1997</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0100</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Monkey See, Human Do: The Study of Primate-Human Communication.</title>
		<publication><I>Semiotica</I>, 109(3/4):357-360.</publication>
		<annotation>Review of <I>Aping Language</I> by Joel Wallman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0101</record_number>
		<author>Sheldon, Mark, et al.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Nazi Data: Dissociation from Evil.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report</I>, pp. 16-18.</publication>
		<annotation>Three commentaries on the use of Nazi data in contemporary medical research. One measured defense--based on conditions of the data's reliability, unavailability from other sources, contribution to the greater good, and publication with condemnation of the means of its initial collection--is twice countered in the name of researchers' moral integrity and refusal to legitimize the Nazis.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, PUBLISHING, DATA MANAGEMENT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0102</record_number>
		<author>Berger, Robert L.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Nazi Science--The Dachau Hypothermia Experiments.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 322:1435-1440.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews Dachau experiments and argues against use of data based on critical shortcomings in scientific content and credibility. Also argues against furthering this ethical debate so as not to suggest that Nazi experimentation yielded results worthy of consideration and beneficial to humanity.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0103</record_number>
		<author>Wheeler, D. L.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>NIH Office That Investigates Scientists' Misconduct is Target of Widespread Charges of Incompetence.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, May 15, 1991:A5, A8.</publication>
		<annotation>The Office of Scientific Integrity has been criticized for inefficiency, lethargy, leniency and poor organization.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0104</record_number>
		<author>Holden, C.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>NIMH Finds a Case of Serious Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 235:1566-1567.</publication>
		<annotation>Oulines charges of misconduct against Dr. Stephen Breuning, a psychologist accused on inventing raw data and publishing the results of non-existent experiments. The results were used in social policy making.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, PUBLISHING, PSYCHOLOGY, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0105</record_number>
		<author>Buzzelli, Donald E.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>NSF's Definition of Misconduct in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:273-296.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] addresses questions about the process of handling misconduct cases, this time from his point of view in a government agency. But his main focus is to address in detail a controversial question that is at least touched on in each of the other articles: the controversy over the definition of scientific misconduct. He gives an extended analysis of the various arguments against NSF's 'open-ended' definition, and attempts to show that the attack on the definition as open to abuse via arbitrary interpreation is a result of misunderstanding (p. 214).</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, POLICY, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0106</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1949</date>
		<title>Nuremberg Code.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law</I> No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Also, reprinted in <I>Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research</I>.</publication>
		<annotation>Drafted in response to the atrocities committed in Nazi experimentation with human subjects. Sets forth the basic principles for ethical experimentation, including informed consent, social benefit that outweighs risk to subjects, avoidance of harm, necessity, qualified researchers and the subject's right to terminate the experiment at any point.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0107</record_number>
		<author>Audi, Robert.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>On the Ethics of Teaching and the Ideals of Learning.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Sept-Oct.:27-36.</publication>
		<annotation>Monograph articulates four central pedagogic paradigms in college teaching (didactic, apprentice, collegial and friendship) and identifies pertinent ethical principles for the faculty-student relationship in each.</annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0108</record_number>
		<author>Braxton, John M., ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Perspectives on Research Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 65(3):242-400.</publication>
		<annotation>Special issue aimed at increasing knowledge and understanding of collective responsibility for the deterrence, detection and handling of misconduct by scientists, universities, academic journals, grant-giving agencies and legislatures.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>6/6/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0109</record_number>
		<author>Jonas, Hans.</author>
		<date>1969</date>
		<title>Philosophical Reflections on Experimenting with Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Daedalus</I>, 98(2):219-47.</publication>
		<annotation>Considers the use of human subjects to be a balance of social needs vs. matters of individual sacrosanticity and personal dignity. Argues that consent to experimentation, regardless of the importance of the research, is insufficient because of the primacy of the individual and the personal sacrifice involved. Also argues that it is necessary to consider how proximate the subject's interests are to those of the interests of the researcher and whether the experiment relates to the subject's own disease.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS, SELECTION OF SUBJECTS, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0110</record_number>
		<author>Pardes, Herbert, et al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Physicians and the Animal-Rights Movement.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 324(4):1640-1643.</publication>
		<annotation>Warns of the dangers that animal-rights activists pose to medical research, discusses the tactics of activists, including frightening the public, using psychological warfare,  violence, legal maneuvers, and the myth of alternatives, and urges physicians to inform their patients about the benefits and importance of experimentation with animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0111</record_number>
		<author>Budiansky, Stephen.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Playing Roulette with Experimental Drugs.</title>
		<publication><I>U.S. News and World Report</I>, 103(July 13):58-59.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews the ethical issue arising from physician-researchers' zeal to enroll subjects in experimental drug tests that may not be in the subjects' best interests.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0112</record_number>
		<author>Friedman, Paul J.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Practical Ethical Issues in Scientific Research: Outline of a Discussion.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Lecture/course outline addresses boundaries between research practice and unethical actions, sources of practical problems, and research training and supervision. Contact: School of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, 92037.</annotation>
		<keywords>SYLLABUS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0113</record_number>
		<author>Hayden, Michael R.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease: Are We Ready for Widespread Community Implementation?</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Medical Genetics</I>, 40:515-517.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0115</record_number>
		<author>Wexler, Nancy.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Presymptomatic Testing for Huntington's Disease: Harbinger of the New Genetics.</title>
		<publication><I>National Forum</I>, 73:22-26.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0116</record_number>
		<author>Dorozynski, Alexander.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Privacy Rules Blindside French Glaucoma Effort.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 252 (April 19):369-370.</publication>
		<annotation>Report on the ethical implications of a plan in a French village to notify potential carriers of a genetic defect that can lead to blindness.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0117</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1974</date>
		<title>Problems of Ethics in Research.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View</I>, pp. 193-202. New York: Harper and Row Publishing.</publication>
		<annotation>Milgram defends the ethical legitimacy of his experiments that involved the deception of human subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/6/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0118</record_number>
		<author>Heath, A.G.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Professional Ethics for Research Biologists.</title>
		<publication><I>BioScience</I>, 39:472-474.</publication>
		<annotation>Outlines ethical issues involved in five states of research and its applications: initial ideas for research, gathering data, interpretation of results, publication and evaluation of research and dealing with peers.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, DATA MANAGEMENT, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0119</record_number>
		<author>Blair, Claudia, and Walter Schaffer.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Promotion of the Responsible Conduct of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>NIH Peer Review Notes, </I>, June:4-6.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>POLICY, MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0120</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Protection of Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Code of Federal Regulations</I>, Title 45, Part 46.</publication>
		<annotation>Sets forth federal regulations for the protection of human subjects -- the institutional review board system.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, IRB (INSTITIONAL REVIEW BOARD), RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0121</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary, and Patricia Woolf</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Regulating a 'Knowledge Business': The Research Community Must Better Investigate--and Prevent--Scientific Misconduct, Lest Others Fill the Breach.</title>
		<publication><I>Issues in Science and Technology</I>, 5(2):33.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0122</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Report Absolves Harvard in Case of Fakery.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 215:875-876.</publication>
		<annotation>Suggests that Harvard University was cleared of wrong-doing in the Dr. John Darsee fraud case because of an inadequate investigation. Presents the investigating committee's recommendations for reducing the occurrence of research misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0123</record_number>
		<author>Chubin, Daryl.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Research Malpractice.</title>
		<publication><I>Bioscience</I>, 35:80-89.</publication>
		<annotation>A useful reference article that draws distinctions between practice and malpractice at four stages in the scientific research process: production, reporting, disseminating, and evaluating ideas and information. Chubin reviews responses to malpractice and measures to control it within academic, governmental and public contexts.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0124</record_number>
		<author>Burk, Dan L.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Research Misconduct: Deviance, Due Process, and the Disestablishment of Science.</title>
		<publication><I>George Mason Independent Law Review</I>, 3(2):305-350.</publication>
		<annotation>This essay examines how scientific misconduct is playing a pivotal role in defining the future state of science because it serves as a contact point between the institutions of science and those of the law. Specifically, due process procedures are driving social institutions of science away from their traditionally informal structure and toward a more rigid and formal structure reflecting that of legal institutions.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0125</record_number>
		<author>Baumrind, Diana.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Research Using Intentional Deception.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 40(2):165-74.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews ethical issues concerning intentional deception ten years after the publication of APA guidelines on research with human subjects, and concludes that the guidelines have not reduced intentional deception. Offers alternative research strategies for avoiding deception and for debriefing subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, POLICY, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0126</record_number>
		<author>Newman, Alan.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Research versus Animal Rights: Is There a Middle Ground?</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 77:135-137.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports on the rise of animal rights activism and its impact on researchers, including the development of alternatives to experimental use of animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0127</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Responsibilities of Awardee and Applicant Institutions for Dealing with and Reporting Possible Misconduct in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Federal Register</I>, 54(151):32446-32451.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, GOVERNMENT FUNDING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/16/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0128</record_number>
		<author>Shamoo, Adil E.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Role of Conflict of Interest in Scientific Objectivity: A Case of a Nobel Prize Work.</title>
		<publication><I>Accountability in Research</I>, 2:55-75.</publication>
		<annotation>Investigates research that led to the 1985 Nobel Prize in biology as an illustration of the lacking objectivity among leading scientists in their citations of direct competitors research. Calls for renewing the scientific ethos of cooperation and unselfish acknowledgment of others' work in the face of competition for public recognition, prizes and commercial gain.</annotation>
		<keywords>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, PEER REVIEW, BIOLOGY, CASE STUDIES, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, PUBLISHING, ACADEMIC ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0129</record_number>
		<author>Broad, W. J., and N. Wade.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>Science's Faulty Fraud Detectors.</title>
		<publication><I>Psychology Today</I>, Nov. 1982: 51-57.</publication>
		<annotation>The author suggests that an ineffective three-tiered system of scientific self-correction is the source of increased fraud. The case of Marvin Spector illustrates the failure of replication, the third tier, in preventing scientific fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PEER REVIEW, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0130</record_number>
		<author>Burd, Gail D.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Science, Society and Ethics.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>An 8-week course outline designed to meet NIH ethics instruction requirements for pre-and postdoctoral trainees on training grants. Topics include: ethical decision-making, scientists and their political environment, fraud, whistle blowing, plagiarism, grant writing, and women and minorities in science. Bibliography and discussion guidelines included. Contact: Department of Anatomy and Molecular and Cellular Biology, Life Sciences South Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721.</annotation>
		<keywords>SYLLABUS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, FRAUD, WHISTLEBLOWING, PLAGIARISM, WOMEN, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0131</record_number>
		<author>Smith, R. J.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Scientific Fraud Probed at AAAS Meeting.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 228:1292.</publication>
		<annotation>A panel of academic officials and scientific journal editors agrees that incentives for prolific publishing reward unethical behavior.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0132</record_number>
		<author>Goodstein, David.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Scientific Fraud.</title>
		<publication><I>The American Scholar</I>, 60:505-515.</publication>
		<annotation>Gives examples of scientific fraud and history of federal regulations on scientific misconduct. The author argues that there is a difference between true fraud and harmless minor hypocrisies. In fact, he doubts that scientific progress would occur if all scientists rigorously adhered to proper scientific procedure at all times.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0133</record_number>
		<author>Smith, David H.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>Scientific Knowledge and Forbidden Truth.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report</I>, Vol. 8, No. 6(Dec.):30-34.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues against the implicit correlation in Western culture between scientific knowledge and virtue, and against the absolute right of scholars to freedom of inquiry. Sketches ways that knowledge may be immoral in use, acquisition, or impact, and advocates self-disciplined hesitation in publication of scientific findings.</annotation>
		<keywords>FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, VIRTUE, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, ACADEMIC ETHICS, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/11/1994</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0134</record_number>
		<author>Nigg, Herbert N., and Gabriela Radulescu.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Scientific Misconduct in Environmental Science and Toxicology.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association, </I> Vol. 272, No. 2(July 13):168-170.</publication>
		<annotation>Claims that scientific misconduct easily occurs in environmental science and toxicology and briefly describes four cases. Concludes that scientific misconduct may occur undetected across phyla, genera, and species; that distance from the publishing source makes detection more difficult; that editors and reviewers are not organized to take action against scientific misconduct; that plagiarized authors are likely to report plagiarism; and that there is only a small risk of censure from any source for authors engaging in scientific misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, PUBLISHING, PEER REVIEW, PLAGIARISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0135</record_number>
		<author>Alberts, Bruce, and Kenneth Shine.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Scientists and the Integrity of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 266:1660-1661.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0136</record_number>
		<author>Rosenberg, Steven A.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Secrecy in Medical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 334: 92-394.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0137</record_number>
		<author>NOVA.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Secret of the Wild Child</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: NOVA Star of Science Television/WGBH.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine, </I> Vol. 331, No.15 (Oct. 13, 1994):1030-1031. Follows the first five years of a 13-year-old girl's life after being freed from a home prison where she had been held since age 2. Raises issues involving the interrelations between professionals' personal needs, patient care and the demands of science.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, CHILDREN, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, CASE STUDIES, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>8/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0138</record_number>
		<author>Keith-Spiegel, Patricia, et al.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Sensitizing Undergraduate Students to the Nature, Causes, Scope and Consequences of Research Fraud: Preliminary Report.</title>
		<publication>American Psychological Association Division Two (Teaching) Executive Committee.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports results of survey completed by 65 undergraduate psychology majors who were asked to respond to a series of scenarios describing instances of research fraud. The survey was meant to assess the extent of students' sensitivity to misconduct in preparation for the development of a pamphlet to sensitize undergraduates to scientific values.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ON ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0139</record_number>
		<author>Fienberg, Stephen E., et al., eds.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>Sharing Research Data.</title>
		<publication>National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, Committee on National Statistics (Washington, DC: National Academy Press.)</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, SECRECY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0140</record_number>
		<author>Weil, Vivian, and Rachelle Hollander.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Sharing Scientific Data II: Normative Issues.</title>
		<publication><I>IRB</I>, 12:7-8.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, DATA MANAGEMENT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/10/1995</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0141</record_number>
		<author>Fienberg, Stephen E.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Sharing Statistical Data in the Biomedical and Health Sciences: Ethical, Institutional, Legal, and Professional Dimensions.</title>
		<publication><I>Annual Review of Public Health</I>, 15:1-18.</publication>
		<annotation>Observes that the modern infrastructure of computer networking and the availability of cheap mass storage have removed many major barriers to data sharing. Article discusses the benefits and costs of data sharing and developments specific to data gathered and analyzed by health professionals and researchers.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DATA MANAGEMENT, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0142</record_number>
		<author>Brush, Stephen G.</author>
		<date>1974</date>
		<title>Should the History of Science Be Rated X?: The Way Scientists Behave (According to Historians) Might Not Be a Good Model for Students.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 183:1164-1172.</publication>
		<annotation>Explores the possible dangers of using the history of science in science education because the writings of contemporary science historians do violence to the professional ideal and public image of scientists as rational, open-minded investigators, proceeding methodically, grounded incontrovertibly in the outcome of controlled experiments, and seeking objectively the truth, let the chips fall where they may (p. 1164).</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0143</record_number>
		<author>Jensen, A. R.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>Sir Cyril Burt in Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 78:449-503.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that Cyril Burt's data anomalies are just human error.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0144</record_number>
		<author>Switzer, Robert L.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Six Case Studies.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Case studies with questions, appropriate for undergraduates, address conflicts of interest, fraud, authorship, sexual misconduct. Contact: Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois, Urbana, 61801.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FRAUD, AUTHORSHIP, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, BIOLOGY, CHEMISTRY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0145</record_number>
		<author>Kevles, Daniel J.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Social and Ethical Issues in the Human Genome Project.</title>
		<publication><I>National Forum</I>, 73:18-21.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0146</record_number>
		<author>Strikwerda, Robert A., and John Minor Ross.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Software and Ethical Softness.</title>
		<publication><I>Collegiate Microcomputer</I>, 10(3):129-136.</publication>
		<annotation>Analyzes ethical issues involved in the illegal use of software and presents empirical evidence suggesting the nature and scope of the problem.</annotation>
		<keywords>COMPUTERS, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0147</record_number>
		<author>Milgram, Stanley.</author>
		<date>1965</date>
		<title>Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority.</title>
		<publication><I>Human Relations</I>, 18:57-76.</publication>
		<annotation>Describes the famous Milgram experiments, which involved the deception of human subjects in order to test their willingness to inflict pain on other human beings in obedience to authority.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0148</record_number>
		<author>AAUP.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>Statement on Multiple Authorship.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Sept.-Oct.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0149</record_number>
		<author>Sigma Xi.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Statement on the Use of Animals in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 80:73-76.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents Sigma Xi's recognition of the value of animals and their responsible use in scientific research based on three considerations: the importance for advancing scientific knowledge; the contributions to medical research, and to the study of ecology and environmental problems; and the presence of comprehensive guidelines to ensure humane treatment of animal subjects. Observes a distinction between animal rights (denied) and animal welfare (affirmed).</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0150</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Statement on the Use of Animals in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 80 (Jan./Feb.):73-76.</publication>
		<annotation>Following a request for commentary from all chapter and clubs of the Society, this statement reflects Sigma Xi's policy on the responsible use of animals in research, based on the assumption that well-conducted research with animals has provided, and continues to provide, information, ideas, and applications that can be obtained in no other way. Proposes limiting research using animals to that which is necessary, finding alternatives where feasible, and ensuring that animals do not suffer unnecessarily.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0151</record_number>
		<author>McDonald, C. S., and K. A. Peterson.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Teaching Commitment to Accuracy in Research: Comment on Cronan-Hillix.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 18:100-101.</publication>
		<annotation>Criticism of Cronan-Hillix's (1988, Teaching students the importance of accuracy in research,  <I>Teaching of Psychology, </I> 15, (205-207) policy of giving failing grades for research papers with even one error.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0152</record_number>
		<author>Sachs, Greg A., and Mark Siegler.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Teaching Scientific Integrity and the Responsible Conduct of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 68:871-875.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0153</record_number>
		<author>Gifford, Fred.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Teaching Scientific Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:297-314.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] addresses the concern about misconduct in research from another angle: an attempt to institute preventive measures via a pilot project in the education of scientists. He presents the first module in a program of scientific research ethics -- a case study concerning dilemmas over being less than truthful about the presentation of data, and a set of discussion questions -- to be used in small discussion groups of graduate students and postdoctorate fellows in the sciences. Reflection on the role of such an educational module in the science curriculum poses questions both about pedagogy and about whether or not such instruction concerning ethical problems can (and ought to) be viewed as internal to the scientific community. This last raises in a different way the issue of the socal contract between science and society.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TRUTHTELLING, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION, TEACHING ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0154</record_number>
		<author>Cronan-Hillix, T.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Teaching Students the Importance of Accuracy in Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 15:205-207.</publication>
		<annotation>The author assigns failing grades to students whose results sections in research papers include even one error in order to drive home the point that attention to detail is critical. Students may correct and resubmit, but resubmitted papers are penalized one letter grade.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0155</record_number>
		<author>Cronan-Hillix, T.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Teaching Students the Importance of Accuracy in Research: A Reply to McDonald and Peterson.</title>
		<publication><I>Teaching of Psychology</I>, 18:101-102.</publication>
		<annotation>Citing personal experience with their effective use, the author defends reward and punishment as tools for teaching students to pay attention to details in their research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0156</record_number>
		<author>Price, Alan R.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The 1993 ORI/AAAS Conference on Plagiarism and Theft of Ideas.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Information Ethics</I>, 3:54-63.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PUBLISHING, PLAGIARISM, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0157</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>The Betrayers.</title>
		<publication>London: Horizon/BBC.</publication>
		<annotation>Available from British Broadcasting Company, P.O. Box 7, London, W3 6XJ, England.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0158</record_number>
		<author>Donnelley, Strachan, et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Brave New World of Animal Biotechnology.</title>
		<publication>Special Supplement, <I>Hastings Center Report</I>, Vol. 24, No.1 (January-February).</publication>
		<annotation>A sequel to the earlier Animals, Science, and Ethics addressing three aspects of animal biotechnology: definitions of transgenic organisms and their applications in areas of health, commerce, and scientific research; ethical challenges to animal biotechnology and the contextual moral ecology of animal use in the wild, in scientific labs, in the marketplace, and on farms; and policies and regulations for the use of transgenic animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0159</record_number>
		<author>Cohen, Carl.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>The Case for the Use of Animals in Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 315(14):865-869.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that animals have no rights and that speciesism is an inadequate rationale for prohibiting the use of animals in research. Concludes that alternatives should be utilized where possible but that animal research cannot be eliminated; the use of animals in research should be increased rather than decreased to avoid using humans as subjects; and that the perspectives of opponents to animal experimentation is seldom consistent.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0161</record_number>
		<author>Pfeifer, M.P., and G.L. Snodgrass.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Continued Use of Retracted, Invalid Scientific Literature.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 263:1420-1423.</publication>
		<annotation>A study comparing the number of citations for retracted articles vs. unquestioned articles.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>8/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0162</record_number>
		<author>Shapiro, David W., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 271(6):438-442.</publication>
		<annotation>Concludes, on the basis of survey results, that the core purposes of scientific authorship--to confer credit and denote responsibility for research--are not adequately met by current authorship practices.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ON ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0163</record_number>
		<author>Guston, David H.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Demise of the Social Contract for Science: Misconduct in Science and the Nonmodern World.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:215-248.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] places a careful accounting of recent events concerning scientific misconduct in a broad framework of science policy, political philosophy, and the social studies of science. He argues that the 'social contract for science, ' the view that 'the federal government provides funds for basic research in academia and agrees not to interfere with scientific decision-making, ' is an idea that the present crisis concerning scientific misconduct is causing to be fundamentally rethought (p. 213).</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0164</record_number>
		<author>DeGrazia, David.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>The Ethical Justification for Minimal Paternalism in the Use of the Predictive Test for Huntington's Disease.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 2(4):219-228.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0165</record_number>
		<author>Rosner, Fred, et. al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>The Ethics of Using Scientific Data Obtained by Immoral Means.</title>
		<publication><I>New York State Journal of Medicine</I>, 91(2): 34-139.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviews three areas of research that have sparked the debate about using Nazi data; an EPE phosgene study, hypothermia research and use of Nazi victims' skeleton in anatomy classes. Indicates that at bioethics conferences consensus has not emerged, although authors claim Berger's (1990) discrediting of the data on scientific grounds should definitively end the debate. Points to the loopholes in ethical review of research reported in manuscripts submitted to medical journals.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0166</record_number>
		<author>Mazur, Alan.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>The Experience of Universities in Handling Allegations of Fraud or Misconduct in Research (excerpts).</title>
		<publication>in <I>Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: Report on Workshop Number Two, </I> AAAS-ABA Nat, Conf. of Lawyers and Scientists. Washington, D.C.: AAAS.</publication>
		<annotation>Summarizes eight highly-publicized cases of research fraud in the U.S. in the 1970's and '80's, suggesting the slowness and inadequacy of university investigations.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0167</record_number>
		<author>Lifton, Robert Jay.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>The Experimental Impulse.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide</I>. New York: Basic Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the biographies of doctors Carl Clauberg and Horst Schumann and their sterilization and castration experiments at Auschwitz in relationship to the broader Nazi biomedical vision.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, EUGENEICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/19/1994</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0168</record_number>
		<author>Wright, David E.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Federal Research Misconduct Regulations as Viewed from the Research Universities.</title>
		<publication><I>Centennial Review</I>, 38:249-272.</publication>
		<annotation>One of four essays in this issue on scientific integrity and the university. From the introduction to the issue (by Fred Gifford): [The author] examines the process by which misconduct cases are investigated, from the perspective of those in a university administration. He fits the developments in policy concerning allegations of misconduct into a general model that applies as well to other instances of the federal regulation of scientific research. Amongst the many points put into relief from this perspective is that, while a certain sort of case initiates the process by which regulations are first created, a quite different sort of case becomes the prominent one to which these regulations end up being applied, requiring reinterpretation in the process (p. 213).</annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, POLICY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0169</record_number>
		<author>Sanders, Michael.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>The Forgotten Curriculum: An Argument for Medical Ethics Education.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274 (9): 68-769.</publication>
		<annotation>A plea for systematic ethics instruction as part of medical training, including an ethics question on the board and the establishment of ethics departments in medical schools.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0170</record_number>
		<author>Bebeau, Muriel J., and Stephen J. Thoma.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Impact of a Dental Ethics Curriculum on Moral Reasoning.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Dental Education</I>, 58:684-692.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0171</record_number>
		<author>Garfield, E., and A. Welljams-Doroff.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Impact of Fraudulent Research on the Scientific Literature: The Stephen E. Bruening Case.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 263:1424-1426.</publication>
		<annotation>Concludes that suspicion and/or official judgments of scientific misconduct or fraud are followed by decreases in citations.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PUBLISHING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0172</record_number>
		<author>Herzog, Harold.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>The Moral Status of Mice.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 43(6):473-474.</publication>
		<annotation>This short but poignant article develops a typology of mice to demonstrate how the same animals given different roles and labels in different settings receive different moral consideration, suggesting that the labels animals receive influence their moral status and treatment.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0173</record_number>
		<author>Sholiton, Faye.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>The Nazis and America.</title>
		<publication><I>Hadassah Magazine</I>, Aug./Sept.:14-15.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses viewpoints on both sides of the international debate among scientists, doctors, and ethicists over the ethics of reusing human subject research data collected by the Nazis.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH DATA, HUMAN SUBJECTS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0174</record_number>
		<author>Brobeck, Sonja.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Need for Better Ethical Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Curriculum and Supervision</I>, 5(Winter):194-200.</publication>
		<annotation>Briefly summarizes the development of regulations establishing standards for the treatment of human subjects in research. Argues for improved standards in such areas as researcher qualifications, specification of the characteristics of the particular group to be studied, improved methods of data collection and maintenance of the subject's privacy and anonymity of subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, PUBLISHING, DATA MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIALITY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0175</record_number>
		<author>Dworkin, Roger.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>The New Genetics.</title>
		<publication>In <I>BIOLAW: A Legal and Ethical Reporter on Medicine, Health Care and Bioengineering</I>, pp. 89-112. New York: University Publications of America.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an overview of the legal and ethical issues involved in genetic screening, including physician's obligations in genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis and conveying information to the patient and others; state sponsored and mandatory employer screening; and genetic engineering and gene therapy.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC COUNSELING, EUGENICS, HUMAN GENE THERAPY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0176</record_number>
		<author>Croll, Roger.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title>The Noncontributing Author: An Issue of Credit and Responsibility.</title>
		<publication><I>Perspectives in Biology and Medicine</I>, 27:401-407.</publication>
		<annotation>Exposes inaccuracies in the assumption that all authors listed on a research article have contributed to the underlying research, discusses problems with current practices, and proposes changes that would require authors to have made significant contributions to the research and make them responsible for all aspects of the article.</annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0177</record_number>
		<author>Fishbach, Ruth L., and Diane C. Gilbert.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>The Ombudsman for Research Practice: A Proposal for a New Position and an Invitation to Comment.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, 1:389-402.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0178</record_number>
		<author>Macklin, Ruth.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title>The Problem of Adequate Disclosure in Social Science Research.</title>
		<publication>in <i>Ethical Issues in Social Science Research</i>, edited by Tom Beauchamp, Ruth Faden, R. Jay Wallace, and LeRoy Walters, pp. 193-214. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Supports the application of federal regulations for the protection of human subjects to the social sciences as well as the medical sciences, arguing that the dangers of harm to human subjects and need for informed consent make the principles underlying such regulations, including respect for persons and a utilitarian weighing of social benefits against personal costs, equally applicable. Concludes that outright deception, withholding information relevant to the subject's decision to participate and disguised participant-observation are unethical.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, INFORMED CONSENT, DECEPTION, TRUTHTELLING, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0179</record_number>
		<author>Wiggins, Sandi, et al.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>The Psychological Consequences of Predictive Testing for Huntington's Disease.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 327(20):1402-1405.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/11/1994</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0180</record_number>
		<author>Whitely, William P., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Scientific Community's Response to Evidence of Fraudulent Publication: The Robert Slutsky Case.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 2(July 13):170-173.</publication>
		<annotation>Compares citations made to articles by an author known to have published fraudulent articles (Slutsky) to citations made to a set of control articles. Concludes that when alerted to the presence of fraudulent results in the literature, the scientific community responds by reducing the number of citations of the tainted articles. In the Slutsky case, general news articles and three reviews . . . were most effective and retractions were least effective in purging fraudulent results from the literature.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, FRAUD, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/1/1994</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0181</record_number>
		<author>Rennie, Drummond, and Annette Flanagin.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Second International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 2 (July 13):91.</publication>
		<annotation>Introduction to a special issue of the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> on peer review. Issue includes 26 papers.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0182</record_number>
		<author>Flanagan, M. F., and B. Robinson.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title>The Secrecy Game Revisited.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>, 33:775-776.</publication>
		<annotation>Empirical support for Dunnette's (1966, <I>American Psychologist</I>, 21, 343-352) assertion that psychologists often fail to report significant pieces of information in their research articles. The author discusses implications for replication and validity assessment, and presents recommendations to correct secrecy.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, SECRECY, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0183</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title>The Significance of Animal Suffering.</title>
		<publication><I>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</I>, 13(1):9-12.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that animals suffer, that their suffering is of moral consequence, and that there is no characteristic that makes humans universally more significant morally than animals. Concludes that speciesism -- the preferential treatment of humans over animals -- is not justified, and that we should instead consider the suffering of animals as on a moral par with our own.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0184</record_number>
		<author>Grady, Denise.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>The Ticking of a Time Bomb in the Genes.</title>
		<publication><I>Discover</I>, 8:26-35.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent general discussion of testing and notification for Huntington Disease, raising ethical issues of confidentiality and the right to know test results.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0185</record_number>
		<author>Miller, Neal.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title>The Value of Behavioral Research on Animals.</title>
		<publication><I>American Psychologist</I>. 40(4):423-440.</publication>
		<annotation>Refutes the position of some animal rights activists that animal experimentation has been valueless by discussing the many varied contributions that animal experimentation has made to medicine and health, including benefits to animals, protection of people and crops, behavior therapy and medicine, stress and pain therapy, and learning and memory deficits.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>1/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0186</record_number>
		<author>Janis, Allen I.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>The Value of Scientific Failure.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Scientific Failure</I>, ed. Tamara Horowitz and Allen I. Janis, pp. 13-17. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>Since at least some scientific misconduct arises from researchers who fudge data to get the right answer, having students read this essay might lessen their temptation to fabricate data. The whole book underscores the important point that failure is part and parcel of the scientific enterprise, and apparent failure has often led to important scientific breakthroughs.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, TEACHING ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0187</record_number>
		<author>Office of Research Integrity (Research Integrity Branch, Office of the General Counsel).</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Whistleblower's Conditional Privilege to Report Allegations of Scientific Misconduct.</I></title>
		<publication>Office of Research Integrity, Suite 700, 5515 Security Lane, Rockville, MD 20852.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the Public Health Service's scientific misconduct regulation to protect whistleblowers who allege misconduct, in good faith. Specifically discusses principles of public and common interest, as well as self-interest on the part of the whistleblower. Also covers implications of abusing the privilege to report allegations.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0188</record_number>
		<author>O'Brien, Margaret, and Carol Levine.</author>
		<date>1980</date>
		<title>The XYY Controversy: Researching Violence and Genetics.</title>
		<publication><I>Hastings Center Report, Special Supplement</I>:1-31.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes excerpts from two conferences on genetic determinants, violent behavior, and the ethics of research and research review, stemming from controversial research exploring whether men with an extra Y chromosome are more prone to violent behavior. Raises issues of researcher responsibility to subjects (especially regarding informed consent), to their families, and to society, as well as concerns about sloppy research and media responsibilities regarding reporting of controversial research.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, CRIME, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0189</record_number>
		<author>Carson, Ronald A.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Thinking about Case Stories.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 5(4):347-348.</publication>
		<annotation>The author recommends presenting cases as narrated accounts to spur moral imagination. Comments on article by Kuczeweski et al. on pp. 310-315 of same issue.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0190</record_number>
		<author>Wingfield, Arthur.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Three Case Studies.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Case studies and discussion questions concerning use of human subjects in medical and psychological research are based on actual incidents publicized in the newspapers in past years. Contact: Department of Psychology, Brandeis University, P.O. Box 9110, Waltham, MA 02254.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0191</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter.</author>
		<date>1975</date>
		<title>Tools for Research ...or What the Public Doesn't Know It Is Paying For.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals</I>, pp. 27-91. New York: Avon Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues for the abolition of animal research. Uses the principle of equal consideration of interests -- that all sentient beings have the same stake in their own existence -- to argue that giving primacy to the interests of one species over another on any basis other than its capacity to suffer is illegitimate.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0192</record_number>
		<author>Fisch, Linc, and Carol L. Spence.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Trigger Films on College Teaching, Series E.</title>
		<publication>VHS videocassette produced by the University of Kentucky Offices of Media Design and Production and Instructional Telecommunications. May be ordered for $75 from Michelle Moss, Media Design and Production, University of Kentucky, 170 Taylor Education Bui</publication>
		<annotation>Presents case scenarios involving ethical issues in teaching. Comes with a discussion guide. Not available for rental.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, TEACHING, ACADEMIC ETHICS, VIDEO</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0193</record_number>
		<author>Bird, Stephanie J., and David E. Housman.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Trust and the Collection, Selection, Analysis and Interpretation of Data: A Scientist's View.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I> 1: 371-382.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, TRUST, RESEARCH DATA</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0194</record_number>
		<author>Barber, Bernard.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Trust in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Minerva</I> 25 (Spring/Summer):123-134.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the role of trust -- in both the senses of trustfulness and trustworthiness -- as foundational to the enterprise of science and scientific research, the fiduciary duties of scientists, fraud, the public's trust in science, and deception of human subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>TRUST, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, FRAUD, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, DECEPTION, HUMAN SUBJECTS, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0195</record_number>
		<author>Wheeler, D. L.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>U.S. Has Barred Grants to 6 Scientists in Past 2 Years.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, July 3:A1 and A6.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>7/12/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0196</record_number>
		<author>Morrison, Adrian R.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title>Understanding (and Misunderstanding) the Animal Rights Movement in the United States.</title>
		<publication>In <I>The Ethics of Animal and Human Experimentation</I>, ed. P. P. De Deyn, pp. 93-106. London: John Libbey and Company Ltd.</publication>
		<annotation>Summary: The animal rights movement in the United States focused primarily on attacking biomedical research until fairly recently and gained considerable financial support from an uninformed public. Some organizations have misrepresented the value of animal research to attract sympathizers and have targeted various researchers for public vilification and harassment, while underground terrorists have destroyed laboratories. Some health professionals engage in another reprehensible activity: misquoting the scientific literature to cast doubt on the value of animal-based research. There are those who believe in the animal rights philosophy and seek to live it peacefully. Their views can be respected, but they must consider the implications of their beliefs for humanity and denounce those who sully their cause. Scientists must: (1) assure people that their animals are used by necessity and are treated humanely; (2) correct the distortions that the public hears; and (3) educated non-scientists about the process of science.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0197</record_number>
		<author>Meissen, Gregory H. et al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Understanding the Decision to Take the Predictive Test for Huntington Disease.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Medical Genetics</I>, 39(4):404-410.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0198</record_number>
		<author>Bishop, Jerry E.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Unnatural Selection.</title>
		<publication><I>National Forum</I>, 73:27-29.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0199</record_number>
		<author>American Medical Association. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Use of Genetic Testing by Employers.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, 266:1827-1830.</publication>
		<annotation>Considers the ethical problems with workplace testing of employees, either to exclude those who have increased risks of disease from exposure to workplace hazards to protect worker safety and/or avoid increased health care costs, or to protect public safety. Concludes that genetic testing is generally unethical because of its unreliable accuracy and potential for resulting in unfair discrimination against those who have abnormal test results.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0200</record_number>
		<author>Gift, A. G., et al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Utilizing Research Assistants and Maintaining Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Research in Nursing and Health</I>, 14:229-233.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers specific suggestions for research assistant supervisors to maintain ethical research practices, including reliability and validity checks on RAs' work and unannounced lab visits.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0201</record_number>
		<author>Haber, Joram Graf.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Videophilosophy: Ethics in the 90's.</title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This video series consists of 26 half-hour episodes in which Haber, Distinguished Professor of Philosophy at Bergen Community College, interviews prominent guests addressing ethical issues of topical concern. Following each interview, a panel engages the guests in a brief question and answer session. The topics include: Living Wills,  Legal Ethics,  Ethics and Science,  Physician-Assisted Suicide,  and Animal Rights. The complete set costs $750. A 20-minute demonstration tape also is available.</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ANIMALS, LAW, ETHICS, DEATH, SUICIDE</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0202</record_number>
		<author>Carrese, Joseph A., and Lorna A. Rhodes.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Western Bioethics on the Navajo Reservation: Benefit or Harm?</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274:826-829.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports the results of a focused ethnography with 34 Navajo informants. The authors conclude that discussing negative information, such as that involved in advance care planning, conflicts with the Navajo concept of hozho, which combines the ideas of beauty, goodness, order and harmony. Discusses ethical implications of complying with the Patient Self-determination Act.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHNOGRAPHIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0203</record_number>
		<author>Schachman, Howard K.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>What Is Misconduct in Science?</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 261:148-149, 183.</publication>
		<annotation>Traces the development of the definition of fraud and misconduct, advocating guidelines, regulations, and rules for the former but not for the latter. Says this is a distinction between crooks and jerks and that to impose regulations on the latter may impede scientific research. Specifically, the addition of the clause and other serious deviations from accepted practices to the definition of scientific fraud, says the author, poses great risks to science.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0204</record_number>
		<author>Roman, Mark.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>When Good Scientists Turn Bad.</title>
		<publication><I>Discover</I>, 9(4): 1-58.</publication>
		<annotation>Very readable accounts of recent situations involving misconduct in scientific research, including the cases involving Stephen Breuning in data manipulation and Charles Glueg in data fabrication.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0205</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Sissela.</author>
		<date>1980</date>
		<title>Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibilities.</title>
		<publication>In <I>Ethics Teaching in Higher Education</I>, edited by Daniel Callahan and Sissela Bok, pp. 277-295. New York: Plenum Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the various responsibilities that confront would-be whistleblowers, using examples drawn from government, business, and engineering, and proposes a casuistical method of resolving the conflicts faced by whistleblowers. Also recommends analyzing problems of whistleblowing from the perspective of institutions and professions.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, ENGINEERING, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0206</record_number>
		<author>Branscomb, Anne.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Who Owns Creativity?: Property Rights in the Information Age.</title>
		<publication><I>Technology Review</I>, 91:39-45.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the ethical dilemmas in the area of intellectual property that have resulted from new electronic technologies such as computer programs. Includes a general background of intellectual property laws.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LAW, COMPUTERS, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/27/1997</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0207</record_number>
		<author>McCarthy, John P.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Who Owns These Bones?: Descendant Communities and Partnerships in the Excavation and Analysis of Historic Cemetery Sites in New York and Philadelphia.</title>
		<publication><I>Public Archaeology Review</I>, 4(2):3-12.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ARCHAEOLOGY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0208</record_number>
		<author>McCabe, Katie.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title>Who Will Live, Who Will Die?.</title>
		<publication><I>The Washingtonian</I>, 21(11):112-118, 153-157.</publication>
		<annotation>An in-depth look at the effect of the animal rights movement on experimental research using animals, detailing life-saving treatments for persons, the development of which depend on animal experimentation, as well as the tactics used by animal rights groups protesting the use of animals in research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0209</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title>Why Scientific Fact Is Sometimes Fiction.</title>
		<publication><I>The Economist</I>, 302:97-98.</publication>
		<annotation>Editorial. Brief but informative overview of the recent spate of misconduct cases in published research, citing inadequate referee-review, busy laboratory supervisors, large research teams, and multiple authorship as some of the problems which have led to this result.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0210</record_number>
		<author>Dibbern, Donald A., Jr.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Workshop-Based Learning: A Model for Teaching Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 274(9):770-771.</publication>
		<annotation>The authors suggest that the ability to develop a well-reasoned response to ethical quandaries in medicine can best be developed using a workshop-based format that stresses active, independent learning and group interaction.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/8/1997</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0211</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Xenograft Transplantation: Blessing or Blaspheme?</title>
		<publication><I>Lab Animal</I>, 24(1):36-38.</publication>
		<annotation>Analyzes ethical issues in xenograft transplantation (transplanting tissue from a non-human animal to a human being), including animal welfare, medical care, conservation issue, and public health. Concludes that using organs transplanted from animals will be more acceptable when we can use animal species that are already being used for food and less likely to cause any new medical problems. To that end, transplanted organs from safely and humanely raised domestic livestock may be the next use for these animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, XENOGRAFT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/26/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0212</record_number>
		<author>Dula, Annette, and Sara Goering, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>It Just Ain't Fair: The Ethics of Health Care for African-Americans.</I></title>
		<publication>Westport, CN: Praeger.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 275, No.5 (February 7, 1996):406-407 by Linnea Capps, M.D., Harlem Hospital/Columbia University. According to the review, this is a collection of essays by philosophers and ethicists who stress the unique social context of African-Americans when considering access to health care and clinical trials, diversity within the medical profession and other ethical issues not often considered from an African-American perspective.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, MINORITY POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/7/1997</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0213</record_number>
		<author>Magnan, Bob, ed.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>147 Practical Tips for Teaching Professors.</I></title>
		<publication>Madison, Wi: Magna Publications, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>A small, inexpensive booklet filled with simple, practical advice on teaching, including leading discussions, giving lectures, group projects, class evaluations, and evaluating students. While it is not directed at scientists or research ethics, most of the advice can be useful in any course. Most of the tips are compiled from <I>The Teaching Professor, </I> a newsletter.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0214</record_number>
		<author>Ackerman, Terrence F., and Carson Strong.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>A Casebook of Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Real, detailed cases dealing with conflicts between patients' wishes and respect for their well-being, tensions concerning duties to patients unable to care for themselves and obligations to family members, and clashes between patient care obligations and the interests of others, including doctors and the general public.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/26/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0215</record_number>
		<author>Shavelson, Lonny.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>A Chosen Death: The Dying Confront Assisted Suicide.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Simon and Schuster.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 275, No. 2 (Jan.10, 1996):158-159 by Marilyn M. Schapira, M.D., Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. According to the review, this book chronicles the lives and deaths of five terminally or chronically ill people in an effort to understand the decisions both of those desiring to die and those who are asked to assist in fulfilling this wish. Also reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 334(May 2, 1996):1205, by Franklin G. Miller, Ph.D., University of Virginia School of Medicine.</annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, DYING, SUICIDE, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/2009</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0216</record_number>
		<author>DuBose, Edwin R., Ronald P. Hamel, and Laurence J. O'Connell, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>A Matter of Principles?: Ferment in U.S. Bioethics.</I></title>
		<publication>Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International.</publication>
		<annotation>Produced by the Park Ridge Center for the Study of Health, Faith, and Ethics.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>1/2/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0217</record_number>
		<author>de Blois, Jean, Patrick Norris, and Kevin O'Rourke.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>A Primer for Health Care Ethics: Essays for a Pluralistic Society.</I></title>
		<publication>Washington: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0218</record_number>
		<author>American Association for the Advancement of Science.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>AAAS-ABA National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists Project on Scientific Fraud and Misconduct: Report on Workshop Number Three.</I></title>
		<publication>Washington: AAAS.</publication>
		<annotation>Report on fraud and misconduct workshop held Feb. 17-18, 1989, in Irvine, CA. The first part summarizes discussions as recorded by a lawyer-social scientist team. The second part is a collection of the discussion papers prepared by workshop participants. Topics include the applicability of criminal law to scientific misconduct; the role of the universities in implementing federal regulations; access to original research data; and how to handle misconduct without destroying collegiality among scientists. Invited workshop participants included scientists, lawyers, university administrators and federal officials.</annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, LAW, SECRECY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, ACADEMIC ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0219</record_number>
		<author>Weir, Robert F.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Abating Treatment with Critically Ill Patients: Ethical and Legal Limits to the Medical Prolongation of Life.</I></title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Covers historical developments, legal cases and ethical viewpoints with relatively little jargon.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, LAW, DYING, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1994</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0220</record_number>
		<author>Maramark, Sheilah, and Mindi Barth Maline.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Academic Dishonesty among College Students.</I></title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Division of Higher Education and Adult Learning, Office of Research, U.S. Department of Education.</publication>
		<annotation>A small (14 page) brief summarizing what is known about academic dishonesty among college students. For more information, call (202) 219-2243 or write to the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, 555 New Jersey Avenue NW, Room 615, Washington, DC 20208-5646.</annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0221</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date></date>
		<title><I>Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Science Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>Journal devoted to examining issues related to scientific integrity.</annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, MISCONDUCT, POLICY, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0222</record_number>
		<author>Daniels, Norman.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>Am I My Parents' Keeper?: An Essay on Justice between the Young and the Old.</I></title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides a conceptual framework, rooted in a theory of justice, that addresses disputes about how to allocate income support, health care and other resources to different age groups in our society.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0223</record_number>
		<author>Linzey, Andrew.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Animal Theology.</I></title>
		<publication>Urbana: University of Illinois Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: Animal rights is animal theology, in Andrew Linzey's view. He argues that historical theology, creatively defined, must reject humanocentricity. He questions the assumption that if theology is to speak on this issue, it must only do so on the side of the oppressors. Linzey's theological query investigates not only the abstractions of theory, but also the realities of hunting, animal experimentation, and genetic engineering. He is an important, pioneering, Christian voice speaking for those who cannot speak for themselves.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RELIGION, EUGENICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1996</added>
		<modified>5/18/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0224</record_number>
		<author>Adams, Carol J., and Josephine Donovan, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations.</I></title>
		<publication>Durham, NC: Duke University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: <I>Animals and Women</I> is a collection of pioneering essays that explores the theoretical connections between feminism and animal defense. Offering a feminist perspective on the status of animals, this unique volume argues persuasively that both the social construction and oppressions of women are inextricably connected to the ways in which we comprehend and abuse other species. Furthermore, it demonstrates that such a focus does not distract from the struggle for women's rights, but rather contributes to it. This wide-ranging multidisciplinary anthology presents original material from scholars in a variety of fields, as well as a rare, early article by Virginia Woolf. Exploring the leading edge of the species/gender boundary, it addresses such issues as the relationship between abortion rights and animal rights, the connection between woman-battering and animal abuse, and the speciesist basis for much sexist language. Also considered are the ways in which animals have been regarded by science, literature, and the environmentalist movement. A striking mediation on women and wolves is presented, as is an examination of sexual harassment and the taxonomy of hunters and hunting.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, FEMINISM, WOMEN, GENDER, ABORTION, CRIME</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>8/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0225</record_number>
		<author>Garrod, Andrew, ed.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Approaches to Moral Development: New Research and Emerging Themes.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Teachers College Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS, RESEARCH ON ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1996</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0226</record_number>
		<author>Barad, Judith A.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Aquinas on the Nature and Treatment of Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>San Francisco: International Scholars Publications.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This work is an important and original contribution to Aquinian studies. Dr. Barad argues that Thomas Aquinas incorporates evolutionary concepts into many of his teachings. While elements of a proto-Darwinian formulation exist, and while on the ontological and epistemological level Aquinas emphasizes the continuity between human and other animals, some of his ethical exhortations regarding animals do not take this continuity into account. This study examines Aquinas' inconsistency in these areas and suggests how his various texts can be reconciled. Dr. Barad provides us with the first extensive study on the tension between Aquinas's view of evolutionary teachings and his view of the ontological and moral status of animals. Treating animals cruelly can reduce the sympathy people have for one another. Yet, complicating the matter further, Aquinas holds that all animals have absolute natural rights, distinguishing them from mere property. Aquinas had much to say about the nature of animal life and this work is a skillful introduction to this body of thought.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/27/1997</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0227</record_number>
		<author>Vitelli, Karen D., ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Archaeological Ethics.</I></title>
		<publication>Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ARCHAEOLOGY, RESEARCH ETHICS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0228</record_number>
		<author>Agich, George J.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Autonomy and Long-Term Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Analyzes the realities and myths of long-term care and the challenges it poses for the ethics of autonomy.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0229</record_number>
		<author>Morreim, E. Haavi.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Balancing Act: The New Medical Ethics of Medicine's New Economics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Part of Clinical Medical Ethics series edited by H. Tristam Engelhardt Jr. and Kevin William Wildes. Hardcover edition reviewed in the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, May 19, 1993.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0230</record_number>
		<author>U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title><I>Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research.</I></title>
		<publication>Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.</publication>
		<annotation>DHEW Publication No. (OS) 78-0012. Reprinted in Federal Register 44: 23192 (April 18, 1979). Summarizes and discusses the basic ethical principles identified by the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research: respect for persons, beneficence and justice.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0231</record_number>
		<author>Broad, William, and Nicholas Wade.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title><I>Betrayers of the Truth: Fraud and Deceit in the Halls of Science.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc.[Out of print].</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that the conventional ideology of science, shaped by philosophers, historians, and sociologists, inaccurately represents science as a purely logical and verifiable process, and thus cannot account for fraud. Draws on the work of such researchers as Ptolemy, Galileo, Darsee, Alsbati and Soman, to show how motives and needs of scientists--especially for public recognition--are a central factor in shaping their scientific practice. Concludes with some recommendations for minimizing fraud, including advocating public realism about the nature of science.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/8/1997</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0232</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M., and Aaron Katcher.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Between Pets and People: The Importance of Animal Companionship</I>.</title>
		<publication>Rev. ed. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: Here's conclusive evidence from the two foremost researchers in the field that animals have a significant influence on human life and health. The authors show that physical and emotional ailments can be reduced by keeping pets and analyze the surprisingly complex relationships we have with our pets.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1996</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0233</record_number>
		<author>Donovan, Josephine, and Carol J. Adams, eds.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Beyond Animal Rights: A Feminist Caring Ethic for the Treatment of Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Continuum Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, FEMINISM, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/23/1996</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0234</record_number>
		<author>Pluhar, Evelyn B.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>Durham, NC: Duke University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: In <I>Beyond Prejudice</I>, Evelyn B. Pluhar defends the view that any sentient conative being -- one capable of caring about happens to him or herself -- is morally significant, a view that supports the moral status and rights of many nonhuman animals. Confronting traditional and contemporary philosophical arguments, she offers in clear and accessible fashion a thorough examination of theories of moral significance while decisively demonstrating the flaws in the arguments of those who would avoid attributing moral rights to nonhumans. Exposing the traditional view -- which restricts the moral realm to autonomous, fully fledged persons -- as having horrific implications for the treatment of many humans, Pluhar goes on to argue positively that sentient individuals of any species are no less morally significant than the most autonomous human. Her position provides the ultimate justification that is missing from previous defenses of the moral status of nonhuman animals. In the process advancing her position, Pluhar discusses the implications of determining the moral significance of children and abnormal humans as well as its relevance to population policies, the raising of animals for food or product testing, decisions on hunting and euthanasia, and the treatment of companion animals. In addition, the author scrutinizes recent assertions by environmental ethicists that all living things or that natural objects and ecosystems be considered highly morally significant. This powerful book of moral theory challenges all defenders of the moral status quo -- which decrees that animals decidedly do not count -- to reevaluate their convictions.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0235</record_number>
		<author>Association of American Medical Colleges.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Beyond the Framework: Institutional Considerations in Managing Allegations of Misconduct in Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington: Association of American Medical Colleges.</publication>
		<annotation>Official AAMC guidance document oriented primarily toward institutional administrators that goes beyond the general procedural frameworks offered to date and delves into questions of concern for institutions and the federal government. Single copies available free from AAMC, Division of Biomedical Research, 2450 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20037-0487.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0236</record_number>
		<author>Moreno, Jonathan D.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics and Moral Consensus</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Tackles questions about moral consensus in a society that includes diverse value systems, including the role of small group interaction in creating or distorting consensus processes.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0237</record_number>
		<author>Kilner, John F., Nigel M. de S. Cameron, and David L. Schiedermayer, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics and the Future of Medicine: A Christian Appraisal.</I></title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 275 (May 22/29, 1996): 1608-1609, by David C. Thomasma of Loyola University Chicago Medical Center. From the review: A collection of essays written from the point of view that the postmodern and post-Christian era reconstructs human nature to fit its own ends--ends that are manipulative rather than healing. Issues examined include managed care, commodification of human life, rationing and dying.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/8/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0238</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics Forum.</I></title>
		<publication>Laser Disc, distributed by Videodiscovery.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents twelve forums on ethical issues in biology on videodisc, with each forum consisting of video clips and still-frame documents that present various points of views on particular cases. Examines the following topics: fetal alcohol syndrome, a DNA database for criminals, employee rights vs. public safety, breast cancer susceptibility research, human life span, herbicide and pest-resistant plants, an AIDS-resistant gene, gender selection, development vs. biodiversity, infant transplants, Alzheimer's disease and animal research, and euthanasia. Includes both student and teacher guidebooks, and permits access to individual video clips and still frames by barcode.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOLOGY, ANIMALS, VIDEO, CASE STUDIES, CRIME, HUMAN SUBJECTS, COMPUTERS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, WOMEN, GENETIC SCREENING, GENDER</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0239</record_number>
		<author>Charlesworth, Max.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics in a Liberal Society</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press</publication>
		<annotation>Described in a review in the <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 331, No. 10 (Sept. 8, 1994): pp. 686-687 as a lucid and instructive analysis of the concept of autonomy in medical ethics and health care. He unabashedly tackles three controversial areas: decisions at the end of life and assisted suicide, medically assisted reproduction, and the allocation of health care resources.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, DYING, SUICIDE, TECHNOLOGY, GYNECOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0240</record_number>
		<author>Minogue, Brendan Patrick.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics: A Committee Approach.</I></title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: Intended for use by ethics committee members and future health professionals, this text employs the realistic setting of the hospital ethics committee to develop understanding of philosophical and ethical concepts in the field of bioethics. Using sample dialogues to demonstrate how ethical decisions are arrived at by consensus, readers will see the shortcomings of simple, case-by-case solutions and will learn to appreciate the role that bioethics has in universalizing ethical decisions. This in turn will contribute to an understanding of how ethical theory can be a partner in practice.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0241</record_number>
		<author>Rodd, Rosemary</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Biology, Ethics, and Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Addresses the moral status of animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BIOLOGY, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0242</record_number>
		<author>Kenny, Martin.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title><I>Biotechnology: The University-Industrial Complex</I>.</title>
		<publication>New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Pages 113-125 provide a general background discussion of conflicts of interest that arise in connection with university researchers working for commercial enterprises, including impact on graduate students and the free flow of information.</annotation>
		<keywords>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0243</record_number>
		<author>Barry, Robert L.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Breaking the Thread of Life: On Rational Suicide</I>.</title>
		<publication>New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>Arguments supporting the Roman Catholic opposition to suicide, including assisted suicide.</annotation>
		<keywords>SUICIDE, RELIGION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0244</record_number>
		<author>Proctor, Robert N.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We know and Don't Know about Cancer</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Basic Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed by Daniel Callahan in <I>The New York Times Book Review</I> section, April 9, 1995. Also reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 274, No. 7 (Aug. 16, 1995):584. Documents the political and social forces involved in our understanding of the scientific investigation of industry-initiated carcinogenesis.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/6/1997</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0245</record_number>
		<author>Djerassi, Carl.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Cantor's Dilemma</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Doubleday Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>A novel. Djerassi is a scientist who advocates using science in fiction (of which this is an example) to teach the responsible conduct of research. A lively read, and many ethical issues are raised.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, FICTION, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/21/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0246</record_number>
		<author>Blustein, Jeffrey.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Care and Commitment</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The first study of an ethics of care: explores concern for and commitment to individuals, ideals and causes.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0247</record_number>
		<author>Noddings, Nel.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title><i>Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education</i></title>
		<publication>Berkeley: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FEMINISM, TEACHING ETHICS, ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0249</record_number>
		<author>American Psychological Association.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title><I>Casebook on Ethical Principles of Psychologists</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, CASE STUDIES, PSYCHOLOGY, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, POLICY, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/14/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0250</record_number>
		<author>Pregent, Richard.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Charting Your Course: How to Prepare to Teach More Effectively</I>.</title>
		<publication>Madison, WI: Magna.</publication>
		<annotation>A guide written by an educational consultant that presents a highly methodical guide to instructional preparation. Topics include formulation of course objectives, choosing teaching materials, lecture preparation and evaluation. The book contains numerous examples and reviews the major themes along the way.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/11/1994</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0251</record_number>
		<author>Grodin, Michael A., and Leonard H. Glantz, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Children as Research Subjects: Science, Ethics and Law.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A resource for IRB members and children's advocates, this book provides a historical overview of pediatric experimentation and a legal/regulatory presentation, as well as chapters on ethics.</annotation>
		<keywords>CHILDREN, LAW, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0252</record_number>
		<author>Robertson, John A.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Children of Choice: Freedom and the New Reproductive Technologies</I>.</title>
		<publication>Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN, GYNECOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0253</record_number>
		<author>Toombs, S. Kay, David Barnard, and Ronald A. Carson, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Chronic Illness: From Experience to Policy</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The contributors use first-person accounts and perspectives from literature, medicine, philosophy and other fields to explore the experience of chronic illness and the implications for social policy and the professions.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0254</record_number>
		<author>Drane, James F.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Clinical Bioethics: Theory and Practice in Medical-Ethical Decision Making</I>.</title>
		<publication>Kansas City: Sheed and Ward.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0255</record_number>
		<author>Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations.</I></title>
		<publication>Chicago: AMA.</publication>
		<annotation>ISBN 0-89970-6231, OP 632394. Reviewed by Arthur Caplan in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 273, No. 15 (April 19, 1995):1232. Reproduces code and supporting documents tackling issues ranging from euthanasia to confidentiality.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, CONFIDENTIALITY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0256</record_number>
		<author>Gorlin, Rena A., ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Codes of Professional Responsibility</I>.</title>
		<publication>3rd edition. Washington: The Bureau of National Affairs.</publication>
		<annotation>New edition compiles 51 codes, most in full text, from 45 key associations in business, health and law. Includes recent code revisions, plus additional codes and associations not in the previous volume.</annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, LAW, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0257</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Public Health Service, Office of Research Integrity and American Association for the Advancement of Science.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Conference on Plagiarism and Theft of Ideas</I>.</title>
		<publication>Report of the conference proceedings, available via modem from the OASH Bulletin Board or on a 3.5 diskette in WordPerfect 6.1 for Windows, WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS or ASCII formats. Contact: Karen Gorirossi at 301/443-5330 or kgoriros@OASH.SSW.DHHS.GOV.</publication>
		<annotation>Conference focused on the institutional handling of allegations of plagiarism and their societal context. The speakers included university professors and administrators, journal editors and professional association officers.</annotation>
		<keywords>PLAGIARISM, FRAUD, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, WHISTLEBLOWING, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0258</record_number>
		<author>Feldman, Fred.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Confrontations with the Reaper: A Philosophical Study of the Nature and Value of Death.</I></title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A clear discussion on the metaphysics and value of death.</annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0259</record_number>
		<author>Mackintosh, N. J., ed.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Cyril Burt: Fraud or Framed?</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/11/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0261</record_number>
		<author>Burleigh, Michael.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Death and Deliverance: 'Euthanasia' in Germany c. 1900-1945</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>An account of Nazi Germany's euthanasia program, in which 200, 000 handicapped patients in German hospitals were killed under the rationale that they wasted valuable national resources.</annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, EUGENICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0262</record_number>
		<author>Moreno, Jonathan D.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Deciding Together: Bioethics and Moral Consensus</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0263</record_number>
		<author>Efron, John M.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Defenders of the Race: Jewish Doctors and Race Science in Fin-de-Siecle Europe.</I></title>
		<publication>New Haven: Yale University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 274, No. 5 (August 2, 1995:432-433. Argues that sociological and anthropological research on Jews by Jews began as a response to anti-Semitism and made some Jewish race scientists defenders of the race.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, HISTORY, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0264</record_number>
		<author>Terry, Jennifer, and Jacqueline Urla, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Deviant Bodies: Critical Perspectives on Difference in Science and Popular Culture</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The contributors address the ways in which concepts of deviancy have been used to construct what is considered a normal body and what is not.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, POLITICS, WOMEN, PSYCHOLOGY, RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, MINORITY POPULATIONS, GYNECOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0266</record_number>
		<author>Lidz, Charles W., Lynn Fischer, and Robert M. Arnold.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Erosion of Autonomy in Long-Term Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Distinguishes among various types of autonomy and gives recommendations for change.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0267</record_number>
		<author>Hare, R. M.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Essays on Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press</publication>
		<annotation>The best of Hare's writing on medical ethics and related topics. He applies a coherent ethical theory to moral problems related to abortion, embryo experimentation, population policy, experimentation on children, health care policy, free will and vegetarianism.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/27/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0268</record_number>
		<author>Gray, Joni N., et al.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Ethical and Legal Issues in AIDS Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 275, No. 4 (January 24/31, 1996):329-330 by Ralf Jurgens, Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, Montreal. According to the review, this book focuses on psychosocial research in the area of HIV/AIDS, but has insights applicable to all human subjects research. The authors advocate consultation with affected groups, which tend to already be vulnerable because of discrimination and stigmatization and which may obtain fewer benefits as a result of participating in research. The chapters on legal issues center on confidentiality.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, RESEARCH ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0269</record_number>
		<author>Aoki, Kiyoshi, ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Dilemmas in Health and Development</I>.</title>
		<publication>Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0270</record_number>
		<author>Brody, Baruch A.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Drug Testing, Approval and Pricing: The Clot-Dissolving Drugs</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers the first comprehensive analysis from an ethical perspective of the entire drug development process. It compares American and European approaches to the development of thrombolytic drugs as an example.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0271</record_number>
		<author>Hilton, Bruce, et al., eds.</author>
		<date>1973</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Human Genetics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Plenum Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Although this volume is now a bit dated, it contains articles discussing a number of still-timely issues, including the ethical uses of genetic knowledge, the ethics of genetic counseling (see Gustafson, above), ethical issues in screening adults for TaySachs disease, the ethics of genetic screening, implications of prenatal diagnosis for the human right to life and quality of life, privacy and genetic information, and the moral dimensions of parental decision-making in genetic counseling.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC COUNSELING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0272</record_number>
		<author>Bernat, James L.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Neurology</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> Vol. 333, No. 1 (July 6, 1995), 333:71 and in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 274, No. 15 (October 18, 1995): 245-1246. Covers the fundamentals of ethical theory and medicolegal concepts and discusses current ethical issues in medicine.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/12/1994</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0273</record_number>
		<author>Erwin, Edward, Sidney Gendin, and Lowell Kleiman, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Scientific Research: An Anthology</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Garland.</publication>
		<annotation>This collection of essays by scientists and philosophers addresses the major areas of moral debate regarding research: fraud and deception, controlled experiments on humans, animal and genetic research, IQ and military research.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, GENETIC RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, ANIMALS, DECEPTION, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/27/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0274</record_number>
		<author>Battin, Margaret Pabst.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Suicide</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SUICIDE, ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0275</record_number>
		<author>American Psychological Association.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Principles in the Conduct of Research with Human Participants</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.</publication>
		<annotation>Based on APA Principle 9: Research with Human Participants. Discusses the ethical dilemmas involved in conducting psychological research with human subjects and the guidelines that should shape their resolution, including determining whether to undertake a particular research project involving human subjects, informed consent, when, if ever, deception of human subjects is acceptable, what constitutes harm to and exploitation or coercion of human subjects, responsibilities of researchers for debriefing subjects at the conclusion of research.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, INFORMED CONSENT, DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGY, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/29/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0276</record_number>
		<author>Koocher, Gerald P., ed.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Behavior</I>.</title>
		<publication>Vol. 3(1).</publication>
		<annotation>Special issue on whistleblowing and misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0277</record_number>
		<author>May, William W., ed.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Higher Education</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Macmillan.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0278</record_number>
		<author>Wertz, Dorothy, and John Fletcher, eds.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Perspective</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berlin: Springer-Verlag.</publication>
		<annotation>Especially relevant are Chapter 2.19.2 (Ethical Problems), which discusses genetic counseling, prenatal diagnosis, and genetic screening, Chapter 2.19.5 (Ethical Issues and Future Trends), and Chapter 3 (Ethics and Human Genetics: A CrossCultural Perspective), which covers the major ethical problems in the practice of human genetics in contemporary society, the need to develop approaches to educate and formulate resolutions for these problems, and the responsibilities of geneticists to formulate public policies on these problems.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC COUNSELING, GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC COUNSELING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0279</record_number>
		<author>Goldworth, Amnon, William Silverman, David K. Stevenson, Ernle W.D. Young, and Rodney Rivers, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Perinatology</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 333 (22):1509-1510 by Robert L. Goldenberg, University of Alabama-Birmingham. Deals with the ethical issues of medical care immediately before and after birth, including the sometimes incompatible interests of the two patients (mother and child) and the fuzzy line separating standard practice and unauthorized research. The essays are written by practicing health-care professionals and ethicists. Each topic features a chapter and a critical response with additional commentary.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GYNECOLOGY, OBSTETRICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0280</record_number>
		<author>Council of Biology Editors. Editorial Policy Committee, eds.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>A collection of scenarios dealing with various ethical issues faced by publishers of scientific journals. Responses of surveyed scientific editors to the issues are presented, followed by discussion, recommendations and conclusions. Part II consists of conference proceedings on the theme of Accountability and Authorship: Where Does the Responsibility Lie?</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, POLICY, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0281</record_number>
		<author>Levine, Robert J.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Regulation of Clinical Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd ed. Baltimore: Urban and Schwarzenberg.</publication>
		<annotation>Good background reference source, especially Chapter 4 (Selection of Subjects), Chapter 5 (Informed Consent), Chapter 7 (Privacy and Confidentiality), Chapter 9 (Deception), and Chapter 14 (The Institutional Review Board).</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, DECEPTION, IRB (INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD), BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SELECTION OF SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0282</record_number>
		<author>Wicclair, Mark R.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and the Elderly</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Covers issues such as life-sustaining medical treatment, age-rationing cost control, research with elderly subjects, institutional dependence and the responsibilities of adult children. Includes extensive case studies.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH WITH AGED, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/14/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0283</record_number>
		<author>Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn, ed.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and the Profession of Anthropology: Dialogue for a New Era</I>.</title>
		<publication>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents the views of academic and applied anthropologists, rather than presenting case studies or ethical standards derived from cases. The topics include community anonymity, Sunshine laws and freedom of information, development research, secret research and community-based research. Includes a compendium of ethics codes from various professional anthropology associations.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, SECRECY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, CODES OF RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0284</record_number>
		<author>Vilani, Patricia J., ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethics and Values in Long Term Health Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>Binghamton, NY: Haworth.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0285</record_number>
		<author>La Puma, John, and David Schiedermayer.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethics Consultation: A Practical Guide</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 331, No. 22 (Dec. 1, 1994):1532f. and in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 19 (Nov. 16, 1994): 1553-1554. A short, but in-depth, introduction to the practice of clinical ethics.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS CONSULTATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0286</record_number>
		<author>Grafius, Linda C.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Ethics for Everyone: A Practical Guide to Interdisciplinary Biomedical Ethics Education</I>.</title>
		<publication>Chicago: American Hospital Association.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0287</record_number>
		<author>Caws, Peter.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Ethics from Experience</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0288</record_number>
		<author>Barbour, Ian G.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in an Age of Technology: The Gifford Lectures 1989-1991</I>, Vol. 2.</title>
		<publication>San Francisco: Harper.</publication>
		<annotation>Outlines conflicting modern appraisals of technology, examines premises of science, philosophy, and religion for formulating an ethics for technology, and discusses the implications of technology in such areas as agricultural production, energy, nuclear power and nuclear weapons, computers, and genetic engineering. Discusses pros and cons of democratic governance of technology, and weds a Rawlsian ideal of benefit to the least advantaged with biblical faith in calling for a reorientation of technology toward justice, participation, and sustainability.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, RELIGION, EUGENICS, COMPUTERS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>8/12/2002</modified>
		<record_number>0289</record_number>
		<author>Ahronheim, Judith C., et al., ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Clinical Practice</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Little, Brown and Co.</publication>
		<annotation>General text reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 273, No. 6 (Feb. 8, 1995):507.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0290</record_number>
		<author>Benjamin, Martin, and Joy Curtis.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Nursing</I>.</title>
		<publication>3rd edition. London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Readable ethics text suitable for those with little or no background in philosophy. Covers ethical theory, codes, whistleblowing, rationing and issues arising from relationships nurses have with their patients, physicians and each other.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS, WHISTLEBLOWING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1994</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0291</record_number>
		<author>McCullough, Laurence B., and Frank A. Chervenak.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers a comprehensive and clinically practical approach to ethics in the everyday practice of obstetrics and gynecology. The authors develop preventive and management strategies based on a framework for bioethics in the clinical setting.</annotation>
		<keywords>OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0292</record_number>
		<author>Keith-Spiegel, Patricia, and Gerald Koocher.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Psychology: Professional Standards and Cases</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Random House.</publication>
		<annotation>This text was designed for both teaching and as a consultation resource for use by individual psychologists. Of particular relevance to the cases are Chapter 1, on codes of ethical conduct for psychologists and enforcement; Chapter 2, on the roles and functions of ethics committees; Chapter 13, on scholarly publishing and teaching; Chapter 14, on research issues, including discussions of the ethical treatment of subjects, assessing risks and benefits of research, deception and concealment, privacy, and confidentiality of research inside and outside the lab; and Chapter 15, entitled Psychology and the Public Trust.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, TEACHING ETHICS, ETHICS CONSULTATION, PUBLISHING, TEACHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, DECEPTION, CONFIDENTIALITY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, SECRECY, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0293</record_number>
		<author>Bower, Robert T., and Priscilla Gasparis.</author>
		<date>1978</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Social Research: Protecting the Interests of Human Subjects</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Praeger Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>Good historical background to the regulation of research on human subjects. Chapters also cover risks to subjects of social research, including deception, coercion, breach of privacy and confidentiality, stress and risks to the larger society, informed consent, balancing harms and benefits, and regulation.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, DECEPTION, CONFIDENTIALITY, INFORMED CONSENT, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0294</record_number>
		<author>Shrader-Frechette, Kristin.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethics of Scientific Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that research cannot be value-free and discusses three principles of ethical research: avoiding biased results and reports, promoting unbiased use of results and reports, and promoting the public good. Claims that different norms govern applied and pure research in regard to type-I and type-II errors. Last four chapters are case studies dealing with ethical issues in data interpretation, sexist bias, engineering design and risk assessment.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, CASE STUDIES, DATA MANAGEMENT, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, GENDER</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0295</record_number>
		<author>Callahan, Daniel, and Sissela Bok.</author>
		<date>1980</date>
		<title><I>Ethics Teaching in Higher Education</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Plenum Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0296</record_number>
		<author>Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Ethics, Values, and the Promise of Science</I>.</title>
		<publication>Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.</publication>
		<annotation>Proceedings of a forum, convened by Sigma Xi in February, 1993, to investigate issues arising from the conjunction of science and the rest of society. Includes papers presented, plus conclusions and recommendations of discussion groups addressing, e.g. peer review, definitions and responses to misconduct, mentoring, and the media.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, PEER REVIEW, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, MENTORING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0297</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter, ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Interdisciplinary collection of readings in moral philosophy suitable as a foundation text in an applied ethics course.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0298</record_number>
		<author>Frankena, William K.</author>
		<date>1973</date>
		<title><I>Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>A concise (c. 100 pp.) introduction to the problems and positions of moral philosophers in the form of the author's own doing of moral philosophy. Sets forth and analyzes deontological, utilitarian, and virtue theories, and concludes with a discussion of meta-ethical issues. Excellent as a basic reference guide for students of ethics and moral philosophy.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0299</record_number>
		<author>Royal Dutch Medical Association.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Euthanasia in the Netherlands: The State of the Legal Debate</I>.</title>
		<publication>3rd ed. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Royal Dutch Medical Association.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/22/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0300</record_number>
		<author>Freund, Paul A., ed.</author>
		<date>1969</date>
		<title><I>Experimentation with Human Beings</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: George Braziller.</publication>
		<annotation>A classic text on research involving human subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0301</record_number>
		<author>Katz, Jay.</author>
		<date>1972</date>
		<title><I>Experimentation with Human Beings</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Russell Sage Foundation.</publication>
		<annotation>A classic text on research involving human subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0302</record_number>
		<author>Wolf, Susan M., ed.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Feminism and Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Volume of original essays authored by leading figures in bioethics and feminist theory. Topics include the relationship of feminism and bioethics, feminist approaches to bioethics, lessons from the women's health movement, communicative ethics in the physician-patient relationship, and ethical obstacles to the participation of women in boimedical research.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FEMINISM, WOMEN, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0303</record_number>
		<author>Card, Claudia, ed.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Feminist Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FEMINISM, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0304</record_number>
		<author>Held, Virginia.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, FEMINISM, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0305</record_number>
		<author>Holmes, Helen Bequaert, and Laura M. Purdy, eds.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Feminist Perspectives in Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FEMINISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0306</record_number>
		<author>Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>For the Patient's Good</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers a well-knit argument and realistic proposals for virtuous medical practice.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, VIRTUE, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0307</record_number>
		<author>Committee on Academic Responsibility.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Fostering Academic Integrity</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.</publication>
		<annotation>Report.</annotation>
		<keywords>ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0308</record_number>
		<author>Engelhardt, H. Tristram.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Foundations of Bioethics: An Introduction and Critique</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd edition. London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Substantially revised from the 1984 edition. A review in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 335, No. 2, (July 11, 1996):141-142, calls this one of the most brilliant books to appear in the field of bioethics, and also one of the most troubling. Also reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 276, No. 20 (Nov. 27, 1996):1685-1686).</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0310</record_number>
		<author>Loewy, Erich.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Freedom and Community: The Ethics of Interdependence</I>.</title>
		<publication>Albany: State University of New York Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From a book review in the <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 330, No. 12 (Mar.24, 1994):871-872: The thesis of this work is that individual autonomy and freedom are best understood within a naturalistic framework that gives primacy to the nurturing function of community. Ethical obligation originates neither in freedom nor in the shell of rights that many thinkers habitually ascribe to individual persons, but rather in the phenomenon of suffering, a view articulated in Loewy's ealier book, Suffering and the Beneficent Community. Ethics is thus less a matter of the rights of isolated individuals, in his view, than a matter of interpersonal relations within the surrounding community.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/19/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0311</record_number>
		<author>Haynes, Roslynn D.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>From Faust to Strangelove: Representations of the Scientist in Western Literature</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 332, No. 18 (May 4, 1995):1241. The author sees six recurrent stereotypes of scientists in books and films: the obsessed, maniacal scientist; the unfeeling, inhuman scientist; the heroic adventurer; the helpless, out-of-control scientist; and the idealist.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0312</record_number>
		<author>Annas, George J., and Sherman Elias, eds.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><i>Gene Mapping: Using Law and Ethics as Guides.</i>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Interdisciplinary collection of essays explores issues related to the Human Genome Project.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW, GENETIC COUNSELING, GENETIC RESEARCH, GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC TESTING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0313</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Office of Technology Assessment.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Genetic Monitoring and Screening in the Workplace</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.</publication>
		<annotation>Chapter 1 provides a summary of the ethical issues involved in workplace genetic screening. Chapter 7 is devoted to consideration of ethical issues, including the voluntariness of workplace screening, access to information obtained from screening, communication and interpretation of test results, and criteria for monitoring workplace screening programs.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOEMDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0314</record_number>
		<author>Santos, M.A.</author>
		<date>1981</date>
		<title><I>Genetics and Man's Future: Legal, Social and Moral Implications of Genetic Engineering</I>.</title>
		<publication>Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.</publication>
		<annotation>Focuses on genetics, law, and human improvement. Argues that children have the right to be born free of genetic defects and proponents thus have the right to genetic information that will enable them to produce such children. Advocates a limited program of eugenics to prevent needless human suffering, which must be guarded against to prevent the abuses of prior eugenics programs.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, LAW, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0315</record_number>
		<author>Teich, Albert, and Frankel, Mark.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Good Science and Responsible Scientists: Meeting the Challenge of Fraud and Misconduct in Science.</I></title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation>A useful overview of the problems of research fraud and misconduct in science. Explains the ambiguity in definitions of fraud and misconduct, summarizes the notorious cases of research misconduct which provided the impetus for governmental regulation, and discusses the structure of federal regulation and oversight, the role of journals, scientific societies and research institutes, and the problems encountered with whistleblowing.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, PUBLISHING, WHISTLEBLOWING, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0316</record_number>
		<author>Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (ILAR).</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.</publication>
		<annotation>A guide to assist institutions in humane, professional use of common laboratory animals. Includes chapters on institutional policies, animal husbandry, veterinarian care, physical plant maintenance, and other special considerations (e.g. use of hazardous substances with animals). Appendixes include a selected bibliography, a list and addresses of professional animal science organizations, and federal laws relevant to animal use.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0317</record_number>
		<author>Office of the Vice Dean for Research, School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Handbook of Ethical Conduct in Biomedical Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>A highly informative, multidimensional handbook offers background to ethical issues in biomedical research, describes U. Penn's instructional program, policy and enforcement, provides 25 brief case studies, and offers public health and legal perspectives on misconduct in research. Four page thematic bibliography. Contact: University of Pennsylvania, 290 John Morgan Building, 36th and Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, 19147.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, LAW,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0318</record_number>
		<author>University of Pennsylvania Biomedical Graduate Studies.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Handbook on Ethical Conduct in Biomedical Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.</publication>
		<annotation>Contact: Maggie Krall, Coordinator, Special Projects and Student Records, Biomedical Graduate Studies, University of Pennsylvania, 240 John Morgan Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6064.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0319</record_number>
		<author>O'Connor, Bonnie Blair.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Healing Traditions: Alternative Medicine and the Health Professions</I>.</title>
		<publication>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association, </I> Vol. 274, No. 15(Oct. 18, 1995):1246. The book's message is that clinicians need to give patients more authority in therapeutic decisions because patients have their own interpretation of what their illnesses mean and what can be done about them. The book highlights the way many patients resort to alternative treatments, often in conjunction with medicine.The author illustrates her thesis with two case studies, one dealing with AIDS.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0320</record_number>
		<author>Monagle, John F., and David C. Thomasma.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Health Care Ethics: Critical Issues</I>.</title>
		<publication>Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 273, No. 9 (Mar. 1, 1995):753. Essays on a variety of issues in health care, including assisted suicide. Includes a discussion of the Human Genome Project.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, SUICIDE</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0321</record_number>
		<author>Downie, R. S., and C. Calman.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Healthy Respect: Ethics in Health Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Contains questions, cases and exercises suitable for instruction on the moral issues including consent, confidentiality, withholding information and the economics of health care.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, DECEPTION, TRUTHTELLING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0322</record_number>
		<author>Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title><I>Honor in Science</I>.</title>
		<publication>New Haven, CT: Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society.</publication>
		<annotation>This short essay is excellent and may do as much as specific case studies to stimulate discussion. Provides an introductory pamphlet of practical advice for beginning researchers in science. Discusses ethical considerations relevant to research, including honesty, manipulation of data, collaborative research, customary practices in the scientific community as a standard for assessing misconduct, responsibilities for reporting misconduct and how to seek assistance in doing so.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, TRUTHTELLING, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, WHISTLEBLOWING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/22/1996</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0323</record_number>
		<author>Weimer, Maryellen, et al.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>How Am I Teaching?: Forms and Activities for Acquiring Instructional Input</I>.</title>
		<publication>Madison, WI: Magna.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides a simple diagnostic matrix to help teachers determine which kind of input they require to improve their effectiveness in the classroom. Nine forms and activities for gathering input from students and peers range from a form to generate fresh teaching ideas to an inventory of mechanical aspects of presenting materials. The forms and activities are ready to copy and administer.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1994</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0324</record_number>
		<author>Kennedy, Eugene C., ed.</author>
		<date>1975</date>
		<title><I>Human Rights and Psychological Research: A Debate on Psychology and Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGY, RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0325</record_number>
		<author>Caplan, Arthur.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>If I Were a Rich Man Could I Buy a Pancreas? And Other Issues on the Ethics of Health Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, May 19, 1993.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0326</record_number>
		<author>Spanier, Bonnie B.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Im/Partial Science: Gender Ideology in Molecular Biology</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Spotlights the social, economic and political contexts in which science is enmeshed by critically examining scientific discourse for distortions and implicit values that reflect sexual ideology.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENDER, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, POLITICS, BIOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0327</record_number>
		<author>Bell, Robert.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Impure Science: Fraud, Compromise and Political Influence in Scientific Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines the roles of the peer review system, referee system and replication in detecting misconduct and how these mechanisms may be hindered by conflicts of interest.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, PEER REVIEW, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, WHISTLEBLOWING, POLITICS, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0328</record_number>
		<author>Kevles, Daniel.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title><I>In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>Kevles' history of the eugenics movement shows how early notions of genetic perfectibility appeared in American history, how the movement was embraced by political liberals as well as conservatives, feminists as well as sexists, was used to support a wide variety of social policy goals, and how public support for eugenics programs waned in the wake of Nazism. Kevles concludes that subsequent developments, such as population control and medical genetics, should be distinguished from the earlier eugenics movement.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0329</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Even-handed treatment of issues relating to how animal subjects are acquired, how their interests are weighed in public policy and how they are treated during the research process.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/23/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0330</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Commisson on Research Integrity.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Integrity and Misconduct in Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.</publication>
		<annotation>Report of the Congressionally mandated Commission on Research Integrity (the Ryan Commission). See also <I>Implementation Proposals on Recommendations by the Commission on Research Integrity</I>.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, WHISTLEBLOWING, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0331</record_number>
		<author>Zussman, Robert.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Intensive Care: Medical Ethics and the Medical Profession</I>.</title>
		<publication>Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Dec. 23/30, 1992.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0332</record_number>
		<author>Council for International Organizations of Medical Science.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human Subjects</I>.</title>
		<publication>Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Science.</publication>
		<annotation>A brief guide to assist (especially developing countries) in defining national policies on the ethics of biomedical research, applying ethical standards in local circumstances, and establishing adequate mechanisms for review of research involving human subjects. Discusses fifteen guidelines divided into subheadings under informed consent, selection of subjects, confidentiality of data, compensation for injury, review procedures, and externally sponsored research.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, DATA MANAGAMENT, COMPENSATION, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0333</record_number>
		<author>Fletcher, John C., et al.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Introduction to Clinical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 275 (Apr. 3, 1996):1032-1033. From the review: A case-based examination of three aspects of clinical ethics--the major obligations of clinicians; frequent problems in clinical ethics; and conceptual, institutional and regional resources needed to address ethical issues. Includes a detailed system for using the case method, relevant pronouncements made by professional bodies, detailed case histories and study questions. The appendixes include a course outline for teaching biomedical ethics to students and practitioners. The reviewer believes the cases and guidelines are too detailed to be practical for practicing clinicians, but are appropriate for advanced students, ethics consultants and ethics committees.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SYLLABUS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0334</record_number>
		<author>Gunsalus, C. K.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Investigating Allegations of Research Misconduct: A Practicum</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation>Course material for a workshop held Dec. 12-13, 1994, in San Francisco. Co-sponsors were AAAS/ABA National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists, Association of American Medical Colleges, Association of American Universities and National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Hands-on materials include an investigation casebook, mock interview materials, sample investigation reports and relevant federal regulations. Includes copies of the AAAS publications Good Science and Responsible Scientists and Beyond the 'Framework.'  Available in a binder for $75 plus $5 shipping and handling from The Scientific Freedom, Responsibility and Law Program, AAAS, 1333 H St. NW, Washington, DC 20005.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0335</record_number>
		<author>McBride, William.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Killing the Messenger</I>.</title>
		<publication>New South Wales: Eldorado, Cremona.</publication>
		<annotation>Autobiography by Australian physician/hero of the 1987 thalidomide scandal in which McBride falsely claimed that he had discovered another teratogenic drug. Reviewed in <I>New Scientist</I>, 60 (Oct. 29, 1994):44.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0336</record_number>
		<author>Hundert, Edward M.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Lessons from an Optical Illusion: On Nature and Nurture</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in the <i>Journal of the American Medical Association</i>, 275 (May 15, 1996):1522-1523, by Greg Kane, M.D., Englewood, CO. From the review: A 250-page essay that reviews Western ideas about nature and nurture, then proposes that values are what move us to categorize our environment and, therefore, that value categorizations in ethics are associated with evolutionary expedience.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, GENERAL</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0337</record_number>
		<author>Ford, Chalres V.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Lies! Lies!! Lies!!!: The Psychology of Deceit</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A comprehensive account of the taxonomy, development, causes, effects, and consequences of lying, treated like any other human characteristic.</annotation>
		<keywords>DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGY, VIDEO</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0338</record_number>
		<author>Pojman, Louis P.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Life and Death: Grappling with the Moral Dilemmas of Our Time</I>.</title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This text identifies nine contemporary moral problems relating to life and death and discusses them from the point of view of various moral theories. The anthology includes 60 of the best related readings. They are presented in dialectical form, highlighting opposing arguments. Topics covered include suicide, euthanasia, abortion, the death penalty, animal rights and war. Study questions encourage further thought and discussion. Has a companion reader entitled <I>Life and Death: A Reader in Moral Problems</I>, which also has study questions.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SUICIDE, ANIMALS, DEATH, ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0339</record_number>
		<author>Steinbock, Bonnie.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Life before Birth: The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Takes an interests-based approach that treats all questions as open.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0340</record_number>
		<author>Jaggar, Alison M., ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Living with Contradictions: Controversies in Feminist Social Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boulder: Westview Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, FEMINISM, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0341</record_number>
		<author>McCullough, Laurence B., and Nancy L. Wilson, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Long-term Care Decisions: Ethical and Conceptual Dimensions</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine, </I> 333(22):1511 by Muriel R. Gillick, Hebrew Rehabilitation Center for Aged, Boston. Addresses the ethical issues that arise in home care and nursing home care. The theme of the book, according to the review, is that the prevailing bioethical model of decision making, with its emphasis on individual autonomy and life-sustaining medical care at the very end of life, is inadequate. The reviewer especially recommends an essay on safety and independence by Bart Collopy and one on resolving conflicts of interest by John Arras.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/26/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0342</record_number>
		<author>Alecson, Deborah Golden.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Lost Lullaby</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berkeley: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 275, No. 5 (Feb. 7, 1996):406 by Steven M. Donn, M.D., University of Michigan Medical Center. The reviewer says this is a one-sided (from the parents' view) tale stressing medicolegal issues involved in the determination of medical care for children. For physicians and medical students, the book is useful mainly as a risk management guide stressing the importance of communication and empathy for grieving parents.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0343</record_number>
		<author>Rose, Hilary.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Love, Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The author's feminist critique focuses on the political economy of the production of knowledge and how women and minorities are affected by what does and does not count as knowledge. The book includes chapters on the Genome program and feminist science fiction as a resource for imagining different sciences and technologies.</annotation>
		<keywords>FEMINISM, GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0344</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Sissela.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Lying</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Vintage Books.</publication>
		<annotation>A general treatment of the topic of lying, including whether the whole truth is attainable, the relationship between truthfulness, deceit and trust, the consequences of lying, excuses, justifications, lying to protect others or for the public good,  deceptive social science research, and paternalistic lies.</annotation>
		<keywords>TRUTHTELLING, DECEPTION, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, ETHICS, TRUST, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0345</record_number>
		<author>U.S. House of Representatives. Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports on the investigation of ten cases of fraud and misconduct in scientific research, including the much publicized cases involving Breuning, Darsee, and Slutsky, with additional findings, conclusions, and recommendations for policing scientific fraud and misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, MISCONDUCT, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0346</record_number>
		<author>Ofshe, Richard, and Ethan Watters.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Making Monsters: False Memory, Psychotherapy and Sexual Hysteria</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association, </I> Vol. 274, No. 13 (Oct. 4, 1995):1089-1090. In a critical examination of the recovered memory movement, the authors suggest that some therapists distort their patients' memories in the interest of understanding bewildering symptoms.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/22/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0347</record_number>
		<author>Lowman, Joseph.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Mastering the Techniques of Teaching</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.</publication>
		<annotation>A general teaching book that presents an empirically based model of exemplary teaching that emphasizes interpersonal rapport with students, along with practical tips in traditional areas of teaching such as preparing lectures and evaluating students and also in important, but rarely emphasized , areas of teaching such as vocal projection and dramatic presentation.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0348</record_number>
		<author>Ruddick, Sara.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Maternal Thinking: Toward a Politics of Peace</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Beacon Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FEMINISM, POLITICS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0349</record_number>
		<author>Veatch, Robert.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>Genetic and Reproductive Technologies.</title>
		<publication>in <I>Medical Ethics</I>, pp. 201-208 and 220-228. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides an introduction to genetic screening and testing, technical and legal background on prenatal screening and diagnosis, carrier testing and screening, and gene mapping and sequencing of the human genome. Ethical and public-policy issues covered include freedom versus coercion, confidentiality versus disclosure, access to genetic testing services, probable benefits and harms, human gene therapy, and genetic engineering.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC RESEARCH, CONFIDENTIALITY, HUMAN GENE THERAPY, EUGENICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, GYNECOLOGY, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0350</record_number>
		<author>Fulford, K. W. M., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Medicine and Moral Reasoning</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0351</record_number>
		<author>Blank, Robert H., and Andrea L. Bonnicksen, eds.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Medicine Unbound: The Human Body and the Limits of Medical Intervention</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Columbia University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0352</record_number>
		<author>Rodwin, Marc A.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Medicine, Money, and Morals: Physicians' Conflicts of Interest</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press</publication>
		<annotation>The first systematic examination of financial conflicts of interest in the medical profession; offers suggestions for reform.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0353</record_number>
		<author>Grodin, Michael A., ed.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Meta-Medical Ethics: The Philosophical Foundations of Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Kluwer Academic.</publication>
		<annotation>A collection of papers and commentaries that focuses on the structure of medicine and the structure of the society in which it must be practiced. Essays explore underlying philosophical issues, interactions between bioethics and the law, a religious version of communitarianism, the use of narrative in medical ethics and the application of feminist concepts to medical practice.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW, FEMINISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0354</record_number>
		<author>Smith, J. David.</author>
		<date>1985</date>
		<title><I>Minds Made Feeble: The Myth and Legacy of the Kallikaks</I>.</title>
		<publication>Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corp.</publication>
		<annotation>Uncovers how wrong Goddard was in his appraisal of the hereditary nature of the Kallikak's feeble mindedness,  and how easily his conclusions were adopted by groups as the basis for political agendas that deny opportunities to certain segments of society. Questions Goddard's classification of Deborah Kallikak, and thus her family, as feeble minded, and explores the factors that influenced Goddard's findings of a genetic explanation for mental retardation. Describes Goddard's influence on limiting immigration, the Nazi racial hygiene program, and notes that echoes of Goddard's conclusions (that ignorance, poverty, and social pathology have a genetic basis) are still influential today.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, ETHICS OF RESEARCH, RESEARCH WITH MENTALLY IMPAIRED, POLITICS, MENTALLY IMPAIRED</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0355</record_number>
		<author>American Association for the Advancement of Science, et al.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Misconduct in Science: Recurring Issues, Fresh Perspectives</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation>Executive summary of conference held in Cambridge, MA. Other sponsors: American Bar Association; National Conference of Lawyers and Scientists; Office of Scientific Integrity Review, Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The report summarizes panel and audience discussion in the areas of (1) definitions and boundaries of misconduct (2) investigating misconduct and (3) the risks, rights and responsibilities of whistleblowers. Copy available for $6 from Kamla Butonie, AAS, 202/326-6792.</annotation>
		<keywords>DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, WHISTLEBLOWING, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0356</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Public Health Service, Office of Research Integrity.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Model Policy and Procedures for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct</I>.</title>
		<publication>Available from ORI, Suite 700, Rockwall II Bldg., 5515 Security Lane, Rockville, MD 20852.</publication>
		<annotation>Models developed to guide institutions in conducting inquiries and investigations of possible misconduct in a way that will comply with PHS requirements.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0357</record_number>
		<author>Blum, Deborah.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Monkey Wars</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A wide-ranging, informative look at the controversy over the use of primates in research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0358</record_number>
		<author>Rest, James. R., and Darcia Narvaez, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Lawrence Erblaum.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0359</record_number>
		<author>Caplan, Arthur.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Moral Matters: Ethical Issues in Medicine and the Life Sciences</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: John Wiley and Sons.</publication>
		<annotation>Columns collected from the St. Paul (MN) Pioneer Press.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0360</record_number>
		<author>Raphael, D.D.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Moral Philosophy</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd edition. London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A standard introduction to moral philosophy that connects abstract ethics and practical problems in the social sciences and medicine.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/29/1996</added>
		<modified>11/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0361</record_number>
		<author>Bebeau, Muriel J., et al.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions.</publication>
		<annotation>A unique 80-page booklet of materials for teaching the responsible conduct of science in college and university science courses. The materials focus on teaching and assessing moral reasoning. Included are an introduction to the approach, instructions on using the cases, an essay for students on Developing a Well-Reasoned Response to a Moral Problem in Scientific Research,  and six one-to-two page case studies in research ethics. Issues covered in the cases include data ownership, plagiarism, whistleblowing, data selection and exclusion, collegial relations, and animal use. More information, a sample case, and the booklet (in PDF format) can be found at http://poynter.indiana.edu/mr-main.html or from the Poynter Center, Indiana University, 618 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405-3602; (812) 855-0261; FAX 855-3315.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, TEACHING, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT OF TEACHING, DATA MANAGEMENT, PLAGIARISM, WHISTLEBLOWING, ANIMALS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0362</record_number>
		<author>Gert, Bernard, et al.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Morality and the New Genetics: A Guide for Students and Health Care Providers</I>.</title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This book is the result of three years of discussions at Dartmouth College among philosophers, physicians, scientists and specialists dealing with the moral problems associated with genetic disabilities. This collaborative endeavor was made possible by a grant from the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) section of the Human Genome Project (HUGO). The overall purpose is to show how philosophical analysis can be of use in developing policies to deal with the moral issues that have arisen from the new genetics.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, POLICY, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0363</record_number>
		<author>Kamm, F. M., ed.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Morality, Mortality</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Vol. I: <I>Death and Whom to Save from It</I>, 1993; Vol. II: <I>Rights, Duties, and Status</I>, 1996. The first part deals with the question, Why is death bad for us?. The second part deals with the question, Whom should we save from death if we cannot save everyone?</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0364</record_number>
		<author>Cassell, Eric J.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Nature of Suffering and the Goals of Medicine</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>An incisive critique of the medical tendency to treat just the disease, rather than a person's suffering. Evocative patient narratives shed light on the doctor-patient relationship.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0365</record_number>
		<author>Annas, George J., and Michael A. Grodin, eds.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code: Human Rights in Human Experimentation</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press</publication>
		<annotation>A thorough reference on Nazi medical research, the doctors' trial and the subsequent history of the informed-consent doctrine in clinical research.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, HISTORY, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/18/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0366</record_number>
		<author>U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts</I>.</title>
		<publication>Contact: NIH Guide, Printing and Reproductions Brand, NIH, Room B4BN23, Building 31, Bethesda, MD 20892.</publication>
		<annotation>Reports findings of scientific misconduct in NIH-funded research. Could be used as case studies.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0367</record_number>
		<author>Sherwin, Susan.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>No Longer Patient: Feminist Ethics and Health Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>Philadelphia: Temple University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FEMINISM, ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0368</record_number>
		<author>Bishop, Anne H., and John R. Scudder.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Nursing Ethics: Therapeutic Caring Presence.</I></title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: The book focuses on the moral sense of nursing by examining nursing ethics as it is rooted in everyday practice rather than just through application of theory in philosophical ethics. The authors argue that because nursing consists of practical ways of fostering the well-being of persons, ethical considerations must arise out of the unique nature of the work. This implies a therapeutic ethic that is founded in caring.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0369</record_number>
		<author>Reichenbach, Bruce R., and V. Elving Anderson.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>On Behalf of God: A Christian Ethic for Biology</I>.</title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.</publication>
		<annotation>Part of Studies in a Christian World View series.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOLOGY, RELIGION, ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0370</record_number>
		<author>National Academy of Sciences.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>On Being a Scientist</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Excellent introductory primer for beginning scientists. Describes some basic aspects of scientific research and the ethical problems that arise in research, including the treatment of data, self-deception, peer review, fraud, allocation of credit and responsibility in collaborative research, plagiarism and upholding the integrity of science.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, DATA MANAGEMENT, PEER REVIEW, FRAUD, AUTHORSHIP, PLAGIARISM, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0371</record_number>
		<author>Weil, Vivian, and John W. Snapper, eds.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Owning Scientific and Technical Information: Value and Ethical Issues</I>.</title>
		<publication>New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, DATA MANAGEMENT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0372</record_number>
		<author>Wilkie, Tom.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Perilous Knowledge: The Human Genome Project and Its Implications</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 13 (Oct. 5, 1994):1076-1077. A narrative of the origins of modern genetics research and the Human Genome Project that is accessible to the non-expert.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0373</record_number>
		<author>Sieber, Joan E.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Planning Ethically Responsible Research: A Guide for Students and Internal Review Boards</I>.</title>
		<publication>Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.</publication>
		<annotation>Addressed to social scientists and researchers conducting social and behavioral research with human subjects. Focuses on four broad areas: Research ethics, regulations, and institutional review boards; ethical issues in social and behavioral research (including informed consent, privacy, confidentiality, and deception); risk/benefit assessment and planning; and vulnerable populations (including children, adolescents, and persons with AIDS).</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, DECEPTION, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0374</record_number>
		<author>Devettere, Raymond.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Practical Decision Making in Health Care Ethics: Cases and Concepts</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0375</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Practical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Singer applies his secular, utilitarian ethic to an analysis of a range of current social and moral problems: equality and discrimination by race, sex, ability, and species: embryo experimentation; abortion; euthanasia; the moral status of animals; civil disobedience; wealth and poverty; overseas aid; and the environment. In a new appendix, he clarifies the controversy, particularly in Germany, that has surrounded his ethical position on human life and euthanasia.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, ANIMALS, DEATH, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0376</record_number>
		<author>Campbell, Alastair, et al.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Practical Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A practical introduction to the range of ethical questions that doctors and other health-care professionals may be expected to encounter in practice. Deals with end of life issues, medical research and consent, confidentiality and AIDS, resource allocation, care of the mentally ill and the doctor-patient relationship.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, DYING, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, EMOTIONALLY IMPAIRED,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/27/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0377</record_number>
		<author>Burgio, G. Roberto, and John D. Lantos.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Primum Non Nocere Today: A Symposium on Pediatric Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Elsevier.</publication>
		<annotation>Symposium in Pavia, Italy, May 1994.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>9/10/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0378</record_number>
		<author>Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress.</author>
		<date>2001</date>
		<title><I>Principles of Biomedical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>ISBN 0-19-514331-0. A discussion of ethical methodology in biomedical research, including four principles that apply to medicine, research and health care delivery: The principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice. In other chapters the authors address the professional-patient relationship, and virtues of health care professionals.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, VIRTUE</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0379</record_number>
		<author>Gillon, Raanan, ed.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Principles of Health Care Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: John Wiley and Sons.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 274, No. 20 (Nov. 22/29, 1995):1637 by Carl Elliott, M.D., McGill University. The reviewer says this is a huge collection of essays from an unusually diverse collection of authors who consider questions in medical ethics from the so-called four principles approach (autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence and justice).</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0380</record_number>
		<author>Holtzman, Neil.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Proceed with Caution: Predicting Genetic Risks in the Recombinant DNA Era</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the implications of genetic research, testing, and screening for the medical profession (the author's primary intended audience). Chapter 5 is devoted to genetic testing.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0381</record_number>
		<author>Sprinkle, Robert Hunt.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Profession of Conscience: The Making and Meaning of Life-Sciences Liberalism</I>.</title>
		<publication>Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> Vol. 332, No. 22 (June 1, 1995):523 and in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 274, No. 21 (Dec. 6, 1995):1723. A history and defense of what the author calls life-sciences liberalism: the belief that the life-scientist serves all best by serving each alone.</annotation>
		<keywords>HISTORY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0382</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date></date>
		<title><I>Professional Ethics Report</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: AAAS.</publication>
		<annotation>Newsletter available from AAAS, Scientific Freedom, Responsibility, and Law Program, 1200 New York Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20005.</annotation>
		<keywords>MISCONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0383</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health. Office for Protection from Research Risks.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Protecting Human Research Subjects: Institutional Review Board Guidebook</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.</publication>
		<annotation>Explicates the federal regulations for the protection of human research subjects. Provides extensive discussion of such concepts as risk/benefit, informed consent, and privacy and confidentiality. Discusses the human subjects issues raised in the context of various kinds of research (e.g., drug trials, AIDS research, genetic research) as well as special concerns necessitated by the involvement in research of certain classes of subjects (e.g., children, prisoners, cognitively impaired persons).</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALTY, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), CHILDREN, RESEARCH WITH MENTALLY IMPAIRED, GENETIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, AT-RISK POPULATIONS,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0385</record_number>
		<author>Bloch, Sidney.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Psychiatric Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd edition. London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Highly praised compilation of readings in psychiatric ethics touching on the ethics of diagnosis, drug treatment, physical manipulation of the brain, sex therapy, suicide, involuntary hospitalization, deinstitutionalization, and confidentiality.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, SUICIDE, CONFIDENTIALITY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0387</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. National Institutes of Health. Office for the Protection from Research Risks.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.</publication>
		<annotation>Comprehensive, detailed description of the Public Health Service regulations regarding the care and treatment of animals used in scientific research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0388</record_number>
		<author>Proctor, Robert N.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>Racial Hygiene: Medicine under the Nazis</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Shows the political functions of science -- enlightenment, production, social control, and apology -- and focuses on the role of the latter two in Nazi medical ideology and practice. Argues that German doctors were neither passive, apolitical victims of the Nazis, nor fanatic criminals, but in large number prominent intellectuals who actively designed and administered central dimensions of the National Socialist racial policy. Traces the late-19th century roots of racial hygiene, the support of the German medical profession in NS racial practice; and broader aspects of the Nazi organic vision, as well as minority German opposition.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, EUGENICS, HISTORY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0389</record_number>
		<author>Birke, Lynda, and Ruth Hubbard, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Reinventing Biology: Respect for Life and the Creation of Knowledge</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The contributors explore the implications of privileging humans in scientific research and ask what would happen if animals were truly seen as subjects, rather than objects, of research.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, FEMINISM, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/6/1997</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0390</record_number>
		<author>Elliott, Deni, and Judy E. Stern, eds.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Research Ethics: A Reader</I>.</title>
		<publication>Hanover: University Press of New England.</publication>
		<annotation>Developed by a consortium of ethicists and scientists over a three-year period in conjunction with a model course on the responsible conduct of research. From the back cover: This reader provides a thorough overview of the ethical dilemmas confronting contemporary research scientists. Original material, reprints, and cases on topics such as relationships with colleagues, institutional responsibility, conflict of interest, experimentation with animals and humans, and methodologies for ethically conducting, reporting, and funding research clarify difficult questions for students and professionals alike. The collection supports efforts, in response to increasingly stringent federal mandates, to include ethics instruction in research training. See also Stern and Elliott, <I>The Ethics of Scientific Research.</I></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, ANIMALS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, HUMAN SUBJECTS, CASE STUDIES, DATA MANAGEMENT, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/29/1996</added>
		<modified>11/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0391</record_number>
		<author>Penslar, Robin Levin.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Research Ethics: Cases and Materials</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A comprehensive casebook for teaching research ethics in the natural sciences, the behavioral sciences, and the humanities for undergraduate, graduate, and post-doctoral students. The cases cover issues in biology, psychology, and history, including plagiarism, confidentiality, conflict of interest, fraud and misconduct, access to research materials, the obligations of mentors and teachers, the reporting of data, and the participation of human and animal subjects in research. Includes pedagogical suggestions for many of the cases, an essay on teaching research ethics, an essay on ethical theory, an annotated bibliography, and extensive instructional notes. Ordering information available at http://poynter.indiana.edu/discbook.html.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGY, PLAGIARISM, HUMAN SUBJECTS, ANIMALS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, FRAUD, MISCONDUCT, DATA MANAGEMENT, MENTORING, CONFIDENTIALITY, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0392</record_number>
		<author>Miller, David J., and Michael Hersen, ed.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Research Fraud in the Behavioral and Biomedical Sciences</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>A collection of essays by specialists in psychology, medicine, law, and philosophy. Topics covered include the history of research fraud and recent case histories, ethical aspects of empirical science, the psychology of people who commit fraud, contributing institutional pressures, and legal ramifications of fraud. In conclusion, the editors consider options for future prevention of research fraud.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGY, LAW, HISTORY, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0393</record_number>
		<author>Dane, Francis.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Research Methods</I>.</title>
		<publication>Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Co.</publication>
		<annotation>Chapter 3, Research Ethics,  provides a good general discussion of unethical conduct that takes place before, during and following the research project, including lack of informed consent, deception, physical and psychological harm, and the placing of limits on the autonomy of subjects. Also dealt with are problems of debriefing, anonymity and confidentiality, as well as relevant federal regulations and the APA's code of ethical conduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, DECEPTION, CONFIDENTIALITY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, PSYCHOLOGY, CODES OF RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0394</record_number>
		<author>Lo, Bernard.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Resolving Ethical Dilemmas: A Guide for Clinicians</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 274, No. 7 (Aug. 16, 1995):587-588. Guide for clinicians that uses clinical case summaries for the ethical analysis of a wide range of issues in clinical ethics, including do-not-resuscitate orders, gifts from patients to doctors and organ transplantation.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS CONSULTATION, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0396</record_number>
		<author>National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Engineering. Institute of Medicine. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process</I>.</title>
		<publication>2 vols. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The report of COSEPUP's Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, which was convened in 1989 to study the factors that affect the responsible conduct of research and to make recommendations for maintaining and improving the integrity of the research process. The report also addresses the processes for handling allegations of misconduct. Volume I includes the findings and recommendations of the study panel. Volume II includes the panel's working papers and various institutional policies that the panel found useful to its work.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0397</record_number>
		<author>Singer, Peter.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Rethinking Life and Death: The Collapse of Our Traditional Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: St Martin's Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 333(22):1509 by Jeffrey Spike, University of Rochester Medical Center. According to the review, Singer crafts a utilitarian argument for admitting that current medical practices regarding the beginning and end of life reflect a change in basic values--and that this shift may be viewed as moral progress. In particular, the book addresses the issues of neonatal treatment and euthanasia in light of a now-antiquated sanctity-of-life doctrine that needs to be recognized as a fig leaf that ethics should discard.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0398</record_number>
		<author>Held, Virginia.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title><I>Rights and Goods: Justifying Social Action</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Free Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, FEMINISM, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0399</record_number>
		<author>Nelkin, Dorothy.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title><I>Science as Intellectual Property: Who Controls Scientific Research?</I></title>
		<publication>New York: MacMillan Publishing Co.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the growing commercialization of research, conflicts of interest between faculty members' commercial and academic responsibilities, increased regulation and whistleblowing, and various disputes involving control of and access to scientific information.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, WHISTLEBLOWING, SECRECY, DATA MANAGEMENT, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/24/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0400</record_number>
		<author>National Academy of Sciences and The Institute of Medicine. Committee on the Use of Animals in Research.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Science, Medicine, and Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A pamphlet defending the use of animals in research on the basis of the important scientific and medical advances that have depended on it, defending current research practices involving animals in the U.S. today as one in which mistakes are rare,  and criticizing the animals rights movement as attempting to eliminate all research using animals.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0401</record_number>
		<author>Chalk, Rosemary.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>Science, Technology and Society: Emerging Relationships</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation>Provides a broad historical overview of emerging relationships between science, technology and society through a collection of articles, editorials and letters from the AAAS journal Science in the years 1949-1987. Topics include scientific freedom and responsibility, ethical questions in the practice of science and its applications, risks and benefits of new technologies, fraud and misconduct, and conflicts between scientific openness and national security pressures for secrecy.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, HISTORY, TECHNOLOGY, FRAUD, SECRECY, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RESEARCH ETHICS, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0402</record_number>
		<author>Grayson, Leslie.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Scientific Deception: An Overview and Guide to the Literature on Misconduct and Fraud in Scientific Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: The British Library.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0403</record_number>
		<author>Macrina, Francis L.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: ASM Press.</publication>
		<annotation>This book provides a thorough orientation to basic issues in research ethics, including mentoring, conflict of interest, record keeping and authorship. For students, it provides concrete descriptions and guidance about what are considered accepted scientific standards in relation to government and institutional policies and classic statements such as the Helsinki Declaration. For teachers, the book additionally has the virtues of having many good, short case studies at the end of each chapter, as well as an appendix of longer case studies (including some suggested writing assignments) that go with most of the chapters. What this book does not do is provide a foundation in ethical theory or go into an in-depth ethical analysis of the issues described.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CASE STUDIES, MENTORING, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, DATA MANAGEMENT, AUTHORSHIP, RESEARCH ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, POLICY, CODES OF ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/7/1994</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0404</record_number>
		<author>Ravetz, Jerome R.</author>
		<date>1971</date>
		<title><I>Scientific Knowledge and Its Social Problems</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Divided into five parts: I. The Varieties of Scientific Experience; II. The Achievement of Scientific Knowledge; III. Social Aspects of Scientific Activity; IV. Science in the Modern World; and V. Conclusion: The Future of Science. Part III includes a chapter on Ethics in Scientific Activity.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0405</record_number>
		<author>Office of Scientific Integrity, National Institutes of Health, Public Health Service.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Scientific Misconduct: Living with the New Regulations: The First Year</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Office of Scientific Integrity.</publication>
		<annotation>Materials for March 13-15, 1991, meeting in Waashington. Include forms and information relevant to assurances/reporting requirements, inquiries and investigations, jurisdictional issues and due process considerations.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0406</record_number>
		<author>U.S. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title><I>Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.</publication>
		<annotation>The Commission's conclusions -- that genetic screening and counseling should be conducted in compliance with the five principles of confidentiality, autonomy, knowledge, well-being, and equity -- are discussed briefly in the Introduction and in depth in Chapter 2, Ethical and Legal Implications.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC COUNSELING, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0407</record_number>
		<author>Bok, Sissela.</author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title><I>Secrets</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Vintage Books.</publication>
		<annotation>A general treatment on the topic of secrecy, including different approaches, secrecy's relation to moral choice, secrecy and self-deception, power and accountability, intrusive social science research, and the limits of confidentiality. Of particular relevance to this chapter are Chapters 11 (Secrecy and Competition in Science) and 14 (Whistleblowing and Leaking).</annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, CONFIDENTIALITY, WHISLTEBLOWING, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/26/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0408</record_number>
		<author>Nelkin, Dorothy.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology</I>.</title>
		<publication>Revised ed. New York: WH Freeman Co.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association, </I> Vol. 274, No. 20 (Nov. 22/29, 1995):1638-1639. According to the review, this edition is updated from 1987 to include the author's observations of recent changes in science reporting. Topics include metaphors of science used in the news, the effects of media reporting on science and the culture of science journalists.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0409</record_number>
		<author>Larson, Edward J.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Sex, Race, and Science: Eugenics in the Deep South</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> Vol. 274, No. 5 (Aug. 2, 1995):433. Analyzes eugenic reforms in the Deep South in the context of state policies.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, POLICY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0410</record_number>
		<author>Sieber, Joan E., ed.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Sharing Social Science Data: Advantages and Challenges</I>.</title>
		<publication>Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, DATA MANAGEMENT, SECRECY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH DATA, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0411</record_number>
		<author>Bulger, Ruth Ellen, Elizabeth Meyer Bobby, and Harvey V. Fineberg, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines the various collective processes through which we subject...ethical and social issues to debate and analysis: hospital ethics committees, institutional review boards, professional associations, ethics centers and grass-roots organizations, with a focus on prospects for further national efforts such as the defunct President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0412</record_number>
		<author>Doherty, William J.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Soul Searching: Why Psychotherapy Must Promote Moral Responsibility</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Basic Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 274, No. 24 (Dec.27, 1995):1968-1969 by William W. Weddington, University of Illinois at Chicago. From the review: It is the author's thesis that for the worse ...the 'therapeutic' has increasingly supplanted religion as the accepted guide for human conduct... . The psychotherapist has become the de facto moral teacher in contemporary American society. Neither training nor tradition has prepared psychotherapists for this social role... . He goes further to point out that psychotherapists need to abandon pretense of an overvalued neutrality and recognize their moral groundings as strengths rather than as countertransference failings... . Finally, the book describes how prospective clients and professionals making referrals can select an appropriate therapist.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0413</record_number>
		<author>Annas, George J.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Standard of Care: The Law of American Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press</publication>
		<annotation>Annas's best interdisciplinary essays on constitutional rights at the beginning of life and at the end of life, the politics of AIDS treatment and research, biotechnology and commerce, organ transplants and implants, and health care rationing.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0414</record_number>
		<author>LaFollette, Marcel C.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><i>Stealing into Print: Fraud, Plagiarism, and Misconduct in Scientific Publishing.</i>.</title>
		<publication>Los Angeles: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Addresses the implications for and ethics of scientific publishing in light of the heightened public awareness concerning scientific misconduct and fraud. Discusses the processes and policies related to peer review, the relationship between authorship and accountability, the risks of whistleblowing, and the responsibilities for investigative action.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, FRAUD, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PLAGIARISM, PEER REVIEW, AUTHORSHIP, WHISTLEBLOWING, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0415</record_number>
		<author>Menzel, Paul T.</author>
		<date>1990</date>
		<title><I>Strong Medicine: The Ethical Rationing of Health Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues for unpopular positions in the debate about health-care rationing.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0416</record_number>
		<author>Reece, Robert D., and Harvey Siegel.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title><I>Studying People: A Primer in the Ethics of Social Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Macon, GA: Mercer University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses ethical problems in social research, including participant research, privacy and deception, informed consent and harm. The volume is written in a style that can be easily used by students in a class working through questions raised in the cases in this chapter. Uses a case-oriented approach.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, CONFIDENTIALITY, DECEPTION, CONSENT, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0417</record_number>
		<author>Lederer, Susan E.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Subjected to Science: Human Experimentation in America before the Second World War</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 332, No. 22 (June 1, 1995):1525. A history of the exploitation of human subjects in the United States before World War II.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, HISTORY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0418</record_number>
		<author>Pretorius, Diederika.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Surrogate Motherhood: A Worldwide View of the Issues</I>.</title>
		<publication>Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, WOMEN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/11/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0419</record_number>
		<author>Crossen, Cynthia.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Tainted Truth: The Manipulation of Fact in America.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Simon and Schuster.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Assocation</I>, Vol. 273, No. 6 (Feb. 8, 1995):508. An expose of science-for-hire, including opinion polls, advertising statistics and biomedical research.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0420</record_number>
		<author>DeGrazia, David.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Taking Animals Seriously: Mental Life and Moral Status</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: What sort of minds do animals have? Do they have feelings, desires, or beliefs? Are they capable of self-awareness, language, or autonomy? Do animals have moral standing, and if so, how seriously should we take their interests when they conflict with human interests? This book distinguishes itself from the sometimes polemical literature on these issues by offering the most judicious and balanced exploration yet available of animals' moral standing and of related questions concerning their minds and welfare. Transcending the overplayed debate between utilitarians and rights theorists, the book employs a fresh methodological approach in defending highly progressive conclusions regarding our treatment of animals. David DeGrazia provides the most thorough discussion yet of whether equal consideration should be extended to animals' interests, and he examines the issues of animal minds and animal welfare with an unparalleled combination of philosophical rigor and empirical documentation. This is a book that could be used in course on animal ethics and bioethics. It is an important contribution to the field of animal ethics and will be read with special interest by all philosophers teaching such courses, as well as biologists, those professionally involved with animals, and general readers concerned about animal welfare.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0421</record_number>
		<author>Korenman, Stanley G., and Allan C. Shipp.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research through a Case Study Approach: A Handbook for Instructors</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges.</publication>
		<annotation>Developed by the AAMC Ad Hoc Committee on Misconduct and Conflict of Interest in Research, for use as an instructional tool in courses designed to meet the NIH training grants ethics requirement. Includes an introduction on the mandate, and the means of teaching responsible conduct, and presents case studies on conducting research, reporting research, peer review, mentoring, misconduct, conflicts of interest, human subjects, animals, and gene therapy and testing, with a bibliography for further reading in each section.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, ANIMALS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, MENTORING, PEER REVIEW, HUMAN GENE THERAPY, GENETIC TESTING, PUBLISHING, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/22/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0422</record_number>
		<author>McKeachie, Wilbert J.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers</I>.</title>
		<publication>9th ed. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.</publication>
		<annotation>An excellent teaching guide full of practical tips and empirical information about what works in the classroom. Topics include traditional teaching areas such as lecture preparation and grading, as well as advice on how to navigate the multiple demands of teaching in the university setting and specific advice for different teaching contexts, including large lecture classes and one-on-one independent studies. A rich resource appropriate for teachers at all levels, from beginners to veterans. Includes chapters by Nancy Chism, Robert Menges, Marilla Svinicki, and Claire Ellen Weinstein.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0423</record_number>
		<author>Harding, Sandra, ed.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Racial Economy of Science: Toward a Democratic Future</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A diverse collection of essays that brings different disciplines and cultural backgrounds to bear on such topics as: the scientific legitimation of culturally approved definitions of race difference, Third World dependence on First World research agendas, and environmental racism in developing countries.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, MINORITY POPULATIONS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0424</record_number>
		<author>Pojman, Louis P., and Francis J. Beckwith, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>The Abortion Controversy: A Reader</I>.</title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This is the most comprehensive set of readings available on the ethics surrounding abortion. Its 29 articles include major Supreme Court decisiosn and evaluations of Roe v. Wade, as well as articles on the personhood, feminist and militancy arguments. Important writings by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and others are included. The readings are set in a pro/con format.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, FEMINISM, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0425</record_number>
		<author>Jasper, James M., and Dorothy Nelkin.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>The Animal Rights Crusade: The Growth of a Moral Protest</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: The Free Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0426</record_number>
		<author>Beller, Fritz K., and Robert F. Weir, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>The Beginning of Human Life</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0427</record_number>
		<author>Fox, Michael.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title><I>The Case for Animal Experimentation: An Evolutionary and Ethics Perspective</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A defense of experimentation with animals in scientific research. Includes a history of research with animals, describes the development of the antivivisectionist movement, and explores the moral status of animals in relation to humans. Concludes that animal welfare is a lower concern than human welfare, although animals should not be mistreated and their suffering should be avoided where possible.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0428</record_number>
		<author>Regan, Tom.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title><I>The Case for Animal Rights</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that animals have rights: valid claims against others to particular treatment and assistance in achieving that treatment. These rights require extensive changes in the way humans treat animals, particularly in the areas of meat-eating and animal experimentation.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/6/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0429</record_number>
		<author>Hill, John Lawrence.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>The Case for Vegetarianism: Philosophy for a Small Planet</I>.</title>
		<publication>Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This clear and elegantly argued book examines from various philosophical perspectives the many reasons for adopting a vegetarian diet, from animal interests and rights, to health benefits, global ecology, and world hunger. Hill's careful working through of different moral philosophies makes the book excellent for critical thinking and introduction to moral philosophy courses as well as for courses in contemporary ethical issues and environmental ethics. The book includes a chapter responding to common objections to becoming vegetarian and an examination of why, if the evidence in its favor is so strong, vegetarianism has not caught on. More comprehensive and more philosophical than previous books on the subject, this is truly the vegetarian defense.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0430</record_number>
		<author>Kevles, Daniel J., and Leroy Hood, eds.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Several chapters relate to the connection between eugenics and modern technologies in human genetics. See, especially, chapters 1, 13, and 14.)</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0431</record_number>
		<author>Watson, James D.; edited by Gunther S. Stent.</author>
		<date>1980</date>
		<title><I>The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: W. W. Norton and Company.</publication>
		<annotation>The text of James Watson's 1968 original account accompanied by commentary, reviews and original papers.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0432</record_number>
		<author>Kovac, Jeffrey.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>The Ethical Chemist: Case Studies in Scientific Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Thirty-two case studies with commentary, categorized as basic,  intermediate,  and advanced,  address ethical issues in chemistry research including interpretation of data, use of research funds, plagiarism and authorship, and conflicts of interest. Contact: Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 37996.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, CHEMISTRY, RESEARCH ETHICS, PLAGIARISM, AUTHORSHIP, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, DATA MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONAL ELTHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0433</record_number>
		<author>Bulger, Ruth Ellen, Elizabeth Heitman, and Stanley Joel Reiser, eds.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological Sciences</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Readings, commentaries, and questions, drawn from the authors' graduate biomedical ethics courses, are organized topically to address norms of ethical conduct in science; scientific honesty; authorship and plagiarism; animal and human subject research; and the relationship of scientists to the broader society.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, SCIENCE RESEARCH, TRUTHTELLING, AUTHORSHIP, PLAGIARISM, ANIMALS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, BIOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0434</record_number>
		<author>Ethics Committee of the American Academy of Ophthalmology.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Ethical Ophthalmologist: A Primer</I>.</title>
		<publication>San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in JAMA 272(23):1869-70. Manual to educate residents and fellows and to guide ophthalmological practice. Topics include informed consent, collegiality, advertising, resource allocation and patient rights.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0435</record_number>
		<author>McNeill, Paul M.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Ethics and Politics of Human Experimentation</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLITICS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0436</record_number>
		<author>Alpern, Kenneth D.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>The Ethics of Reproductive Technology</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press</publication>
		<annotation>Interdisciplinary collection of papers examines the normative and conceptual issues raised by recent innovations in human reproduction, including in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer and surrogate motherhood. Pays particular attention to women's perspectives and concerns.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, WOMEN, GYNECOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/7/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0437</record_number>
		<author>Stern, Judy E., and Deni Elliott.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>The Ethics of Scientific Research: A Guidebook for Course Development</I>.</title>
		<publication>Hanover: University Press of New England.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: This guidebook for instructors details experiences in training faculty and in planning, teaching, and evaluating a course in ethics for students of science. The book outlines strategies developed by a team of faculty at Dartmouth College. It addresses the value of teaching ethics, the structure and goals of the course, and tools used for evaluation of the success of the course. An extensive bibliography lists additional resources. See also Elliott and Stern, eds., <I>Research Ethics: A Reader</I>.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, ANIMALS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, HUMAN SUBJECTS, CASE STUDIES, DATA MANAGEMENT, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, TEACHING ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0438</record_number>
		<author>Sieber, Joan, ed.</author>
		<date>1982</date>
		<title><I>The Ethics of Social Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>2 vol. New York: Springer-Verlag.</publication>
		<annotation>Chapters in Volume 1 relevant to these cases include Chapter 1, Ethical Dilemmas in Social Research,  by the editor, which introduces the problem of ethics in social research and the values that should guide resolution of ethical dilemmas, and Chapter 2, Alternatives to Deception: Why, What, and How,  by Daniel Geller, which provides a taxonomy of deception and discusses the need for alternative methods.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, DECEPTION, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/4/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0439</record_number>
		<author>Public Responsibility in Medicine and Research (PRIMandR).</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>The Evolution of Protecting Human Subjects: From Nuremberg to the Nineties</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boston: PRIMandR.</publication>
		<annotation>Educational materials for conference held Nov. 21-22, 1991, in Boston. Topics include human subjects regulations, international research, genetic research and Nazi research.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, GENETIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0440</record_number>
		<author>Rollin, Bernard.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher's homepage on the World Wide Web: This book is a philosophically sophisticated and scientifically well-informed discussion of the moral and social issues raised by genetically engineering animals, a powerful technology which has major implications for society. Unlike other books on this emotionally charged subject, the author attempts to inform, not inflame, the reader about the real problems society must address in order to manage this technology. Bernard Rollin is both a professor of philosophy, and physiology and biophysics, and writes from a uniquely well-informed perspective on this topic. The style is non-technical and anecdotal and will ensure that the book can be used in a wide range of courses on bioethics, biotechnology, veterinary medicine and public policy. The book could also appeal to a general, non-academic reader with a serious interest in genetic engineering.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ANIMALS, GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0441</record_number>
		<author>Frankel, Mark S., and Albert H. Teich, eds.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>The Genetic Frontier: Ethics, Law and Policy</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 13(Oct. 5, 1994:1076-1077. A text resulting from a conference on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility held by AAAS and ABA in June 1992.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, LAW, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0442</record_number>
		<author>American Association for the Advancement of Science.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>The Genome, Ethics and the Law</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.</publication>
		<annotation>The first chapter by Tabitha Powledge, Ethical and Legal Implications of Genetic Testing: A Synthesis,  provides background on genetic research and testing, control and use of genetic information in the workplace and in medicine, and the implications of testing for insurance, medical personnel, and commercial reasons. The article by Thomas Murray, The Human Genome Project and Genetic Testing: Ethical Implications,  discusses a number of general issues that genetic testing presents for health care and research; using genetic tests to identify carriers, test newborns, neonates, and those at risk; workplace genetic testing; and the implications of testing for insurance and law enforcement.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0443</record_number>
		<author>Hoverman, J. Russell.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>The Landscape Within: An Inquiry on the Structure of Morality</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Peter Lang Publishing.</publication>
		<annotation>Book's thesis is that the biological 'landscape within' may contain one or more structures upon which nature and nurture play to generate moral thought and behavior. Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 273, No. 18 (May 10, 1995):1465.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, GENERAL</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0444</record_number>
		<author>Battin, Margaret Pabst.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>The Least Worst Death: Essays in Bioethics on the End of Life</I></title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers insight into the topics of withdrawing and withholding care, euthanasia, suicide and rationing health care for the elderly.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SUICIDE, DYING, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0445</record_number>
		<author>Tuana, Nancy.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Less Noble Sex: Scientific, Religious and Philosophical Conceptions of Woman's Nature</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines theories of woman's nature to illustrate how the Western view of woman's inferiority has had a cumulative effect across disciplines so that sexist biases have gendered the entire structure of science.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, WOMEN, RELIGION, GENDER, FEMINISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>6/11/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0446</record_number>
		<author>Bollas, Christopher, and David Sundelson.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>The New Informants: The Betrayal of Confidentiality in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy.</I>y.</title>
		<publication>Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 334 (Apr. 25, 1996):1141, by Edward Greer, J.D., M.P.H., Southern New England School of Law. From the review: The authors describe how the absolute privilege of patients in therapy has been corroded by state intrusion ranging from requirements that therapists report suspected child abuse to waivers of confidentiality whenever litigation is pursued. Also reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 275 (Apr. 10, 1996):1131-1132.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, CONFIDENTIALITY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0447</record_number>
		<author>Miller, Arthur G.</author>
		<date>1986</date>
		<title><I>The Obedience Experiments: A Case Study of Controversies in Social Science</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Praeger Publishing.</publication>
		<annotation>Draws together and reviews a diversity of social science critiques of the methodology and theory of deception used in Milgram's obedience research. Introduces Milgram's research program, its extensions and replications in other laboratories, and discusses the ethics involved (Chapter 5), criticisms of Milgram's method and alternatives to deception, and the implications of Milgram's work for understanding the Holocaust.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0448</record_number>
		<author>Veatch, Robert M.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title><I>The Patient as Partner: A Theory of Human-Experimentation Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes chapters discussing the ethics of research involving human subjects, covering the issues of justifications for research, informed consent, and emerging themes and controversies.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0449</record_number>
		<author>May, William F.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>The Patient's Ordeal</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A series of medical ethics studies focusing not on the ethics of medical professionals, but on those of the patient and his or her family in dealing with medical ordeals. Patients discussed include those who are burned, retarded, battered, and molested, and the aged.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0450</record_number>
		<author>Veatch, Robert M.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>The Patient-Physician Relation: The Patient as Partner, Part 2</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>A sequel to the author's previous work on the relationship between the medical researcher and the research subject. He proposes a partnership in which the patient and physician are active agents in the moral decisions involved in patient care, each having responsibilities as well as rights.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/5/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0451</record_number>
		<author>Held, Virginia.</author>
		<date>1970</date>
		<title><I>The Public Interest and Individual Interests</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Basic Books.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY, FEMINISM, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0452</record_number>
		<author>Trombley, Stephen.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>The Right to Reproduce: A History of Coercive Sterilization</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.</publication>
		<annotation>Takes the view that compulsory and coercive sterilization are gross violations of a basic human right, and that most policies of eugenic sterilization are racist, sexist, and imperialistic. Asserts that the history of the eugenics debate has shown that sterilization of the unfit was unlikely to solve either social or medical problems.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, POLICY, HISTORY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0453</record_number>
		<author>U.S. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA).</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title><I>The Role of Genetic Testing in the Prevention of Occupational Disease</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment.</publication>
		<annotation>Chapter 9, Application of Ethical Principles to Genetic Testing,  discusses ethical questions relating to genetic testing in the workplace, including whether employers have duties to employees who may be at increased risk because of their genetic makeup or exposure to hazardous substances; whether genetic screening and monitoring in the workplace is ethical; whether workplace screening programs must be voluntary; and what actions employers can ethically take using information obtained through genetic screening. Also provides background on ethical principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0454</record_number>
		<author>Tucker, William H.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>The Science and Politics of Racial Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Chicago: University of Illinois Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 274, No. 5 (Aug. 2, 1995):433. Chronicles research on genetic differences in intelligence and argues that no justification exists for such research, given the inevitablly oppressive purposes for which the findings are used.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, POLITICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, MINORITY POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0455</record_number>
		<author>Grinnell, Frederick.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>The Scientific Attitude</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents an overview of science through a discussion of philosophical and sociological premises of the scientific attitude and methods of scientific practice. Addresses three broad areas: the doing of science by individual investigators, the collective thought processes and politics of science in graduate training programs, and issues in the conduct and direction of modern professional science. Emphasizes critical thinking about the assumptions of science in clear prose accessible to scientists and lay persons. Includes a chapter on misconduct in research</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/27/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0456</record_number>
		<author>Grady, Christine.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>The Search for an AIDS Vaccine: Ethical Issues in the Development and Testing of a Preventive HIV Vaccine</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the Americal Medical Association</I>, Vol. 275, No. 4 (Jan. 24/31, 1996):329 by Peter Lurie, M.D., University of California-San Francisco. According to the review, the author argues that vaccine research benefits mainly the community and, therefore, implies a requirement for community consent in addition to the protection of individual human subjects involved in HIV-vaccine trials.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/2/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0457</record_number>
		<author>Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>The Virtues in Medical Practice</I>.</title>
		<publication>Oxford: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers a virtue-based ethic for medicine grounded in the nature and ends of medicine as a special kind of human activity. The authors discuss the relationship among principles, rules, virtues and the philosophy of medicine in the context of such practical problems as care of the poor and research with human subjects. Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 16 (Oct. 26, 1994):1303-1304.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICAL THEORY, VIRTUE, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/1/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0458</record_number>
		<author>Lustig, B. Andrew, et al., eds.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Theological Developments in Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Vol. 3 of the Bioethics Yearbook. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/20/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0459</record_number>
		<author>Verhey, Allen, and Stephen E. Lammers.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Theological Voices in Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 332, No. 22 (June 1, 1995):1523-1525. A collection of essays put together by the Park Ridge Center for the Study of Health, Faith, and Ethics. Suggests an alternative model for ethical debate between the extremes of sectarian fundamentalism and listless universalism.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0460</record_number>
		<author>Glaser, John W.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Three Realms of Ethics: Individual, Institutional, Societal--Theoretical Model and Case Studies</I>.</title>
		<publication>Kansas City: Sheed and Ward.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, ETHICAL THEORY, ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/26/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0461</record_number>
		<author>Hawkins, Anne Hunsaker, and James O. Ballard, with Theodore Blaisdell, eds.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Time to Go: Three Plays on Death and Dying, with commentary on end-of-life issues</I>.</title>
		<publication>Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 275, No. 2 (Jan. 10, 1996):158-159 by Marilyn M. Schapira, M.D., Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. According to the review, the book presents three one-act plays that won a script-writing contest on end-of-life issues. One play deals with the impersonality of the hospital setting for a young woman dying of a terminal illness; another deals with the way in which the chronically ill are treated; the last one has to do with discontinuing care when there is no prospect of a reasonable quality of life. An introduction provides historical background, legal precedents and other relevant information. Each play is followed by a commentary, and several appendices for discussions of end-of-life questions.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0462</record_number>
		<author>Freeman, John M., and Kevin McDonnell.</author>
		<date>1987</date>
		<title><I>Tough Decisions: A Casebook in Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Cases dealing mainly with issues that arise in pediatric care.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0463</record_number>
		<author>Kennedy, Ian.</author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title><I>Treat Me Right: Essays in Medical Law and Ethics.</I></title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines issues in medical jurisprudence and medical ethics.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/21/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0464</record_number>
		<author>Whitbeck, Caroline, ed.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title><I>Trustworthy Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Special issue of <I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, 1(4).</publication>
		<annotation>Based on papers presented at a Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science in November 1994.</annotation>
		<keywords>TRUST, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0465</record_number>
		<author>Proctor, Robert N.</author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title><I>Value-Free Science: Purity and Power in Modern Science</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge: Harvard University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Addresses the contextual politics of scientific value-neutrality in periods of Western history, from Plato through the 17th century to the 20th century positivist legacy of neutrality. Calls for a political philosophy of science that goes beyond epistemological and social-contextual considerations to raise political, ethical, and activist questions: How can and should social goals shape scientific practice? Who is served and who ignored? and How is power implicated in establishing boundaries between knowledge and ignorance? Addresses the tension between freedom and social accountability in scientific inquiry.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0466</record_number>
		<author>New York State Task Force on Life and the Law.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>When Death Is Sought: Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the Medical Context</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: New York State Task Force on Life and the Law.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW, DEATH, SUICIDE</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/15/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0467</record_number>
		<author>Mahowald, Mary Briody.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title><I>Women and Children in Health Care: An Unequal Majority</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Topics include sex-roles and stereotypes in health care, abortion, obstetrics and gynecology, abortion, fertility curtailment, fertility enhancement and the right to have a baby, coercive treatment after fetal viability, fetal tissue transplantation, decisions regarding disabled newborns, children and moral agency, and gender socialization and adolescents.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN, OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY, GENDER, WOMEN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/17/1995</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0468</record_number>
		<author>Mastroianni, Anna C., et al.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Women and Health Research: Ethical and Legal Issues of Including Women in Clinical Studies</I>.</title>
		<publication>2 vols. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, Vol. 272, No. 18 (Nov. 9, 1994):1467. Report by 16-member panel commissioned by the NIH to study the issue of including women of child-bearing age in clinical research in the context of the women's health movement.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, WOMEN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/31/1996</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0469</record_number>
		<author>Rosser, Sue. V.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><I>Women's Health--Missing from U.S. Medicine</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The author examines the ethical problems of male-centered clinical research, including underfunding for research of women's diseases and exclusion of women from experimental drug trials.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, FEMINISM, WOMEN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/1/1993</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0470</record_number>
		<author>Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research, University of Illinois.</author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title><I>Four Case Studies</I>.</title>
		<publication>Unpublished.</publication>
		<annotation>Case studies with discussion questions address interpretation of data, plagiarism and authorship, use of research funds, and sexual misconduct. Cases are suitable for advanced students. Contact: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 601 East John Street, Champaign, 61820.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, PLAGIARISM, DATA MANAGEMENT, AUTHORSHIP, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, MISCONDUCT, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/31/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0471</record_number>
		<author>Childress, James F.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Practical Reasoning in Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/31/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0472</record_number>
		<author>Weir, Robert F., ed.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Physician-Assisted Suicide</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SUICIDE, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/31/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0473</record_number>
		<author>Hebert, Philip C., ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Doing Right: A Practical Guide to Ethics for Physicians and Medical Trainees</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/31/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0474</record_number>
		<author>Tong, Rosemary.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Feminist Approaches to Bioethics: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Applications</I>.</title>
		<publication>Boulder: Westview Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FEMINISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>7/31/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0475</record_number>
		<author>May, Larry.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>The Socially Responsive Self: Social Theory and Professional Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0476</record_number>
		<author>Forrow, Lachlan, et al.</author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Preventive Ethics: Expanding the Horizons of Clinical Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Clinical Ethics</I>, 4(4):287-293.</publication>
		<annotation>Draws an analogy between preventive medicine and preventive ethics. As with medical problems, it is better to foresee potential ethical problems and treat them before they get out of hand. Although written for a clinical audience, the general points are applicable to any field.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0477</record_number>
		<author>Hendin, Herbert.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Seduced by Death: Doctors, Patients, and the Dutch Cure</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: W.W. Norton and Co.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SUICIDE, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0478</record_number>
		<author>May, William F.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Testing the Medical Covenant: Active Euthanasia and Health Care Reform</I>.</title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0479</record_number>
		<author>Strong, Carson.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine: A New Framework</I>.</title>
		<publication>New Haven: Yale University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GYNECOLOGY, OBSTETRICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0480</record_number>
		<author>Murray, Thomas H.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>The Worth of a Child</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berkeley: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0481</record_number>
		<author>Meilaender, Gilbert.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics: A Primer for Christians</I>.</title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0482</record_number>
		<author>Dworkin, Roger B.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Limits: The Role of Law in Bioethical Decision Making</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0483</record_number>
		<author>Verhey, Allen, ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Religion and Medical Ethics: Looking Back, Looking Forward</I>.</title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0484</record_number>
		<author>Evans, Donald, and Martyn Evans.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>A Decent Proposal: Ethical Review of Clinical Research.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: John Wiley and Sons.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0485</record_number>
		<author>Mullens, Anne.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Timely Death: Considering Our Last Rights</I>.</title>
		<publication>Toronto: Alred A Knopf.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0486</record_number>
		<author>Moller, David Wendell.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Confronting Death: Values, Institutions, and Human Mortality</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0487</record_number>
		<author>Vanderpool, Harold Y., ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>The Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects: Facing the 21st Century</I>.</title>
		<publication>Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOEMDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0488</record_number>
		<author>Dunstan, G. R., and P. J. Lachmann, ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Euthanasia: Death, Dying and the Medical Duty</I>.</title>
		<publication>London: The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, DYING,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0489</record_number>
		<author>Purdy, Laura M.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Reproducing Persons: Issues in Feminist Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Ithaca: Cornell University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, FEMINISM</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0490</record_number>
		<author>Walters, James W., ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Choosing Who's to Live: Ethics and Aging</I>.</title>
		<publication>Champaign: The University of Illinois Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0491</record_number>
		<author>Loewy, Erich H.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Textbook of Healthcare Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Plenum Publishing Corp.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0492</record_number>
		<author>Coughlin, S. S., et al.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Case Studies in Public Health Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, in press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>8/4/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0493</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date></date>
		<title><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Opragen Publications, P.O. Box 54, Guildford, Surrey GU1 2YF, United Kingdom. Tel/Fax: +44 1483 560074; opragen@cableol.co.uk.</publication>
		<annotation>A quarterly journal. Additional information available at http://www.cableol.co.uk/opragen/.</annotation>
		<keywords>ENGINEERING, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0494</record_number>
		<author>Walters, James W.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>What Is a Person?: An Ethical Exploration</I>.</title>
		<publication>Champaign: University of Illinois Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0495</record_number>
		<author>Pellegrino, Edmund D., and David C. Thomasma.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Helping and Healing: Religious Commitment in Health Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0496</record_number>
		<author>Campbell, Alastair, Max Charlesworth, Grant Gillett, and Gareth Jones, eds.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0497</record_number>
		<author>Smith, Wesley J.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Forced Exit: The Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide to Legalized Murder</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Times Books.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SUICIDE, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1997</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0498</record_number>
		<author>Humber, James M., and Robert F. Almeder, eds.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>What Is Disease?</I></title>
		<publication>Totowa, NJ: The Humana Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENERAL</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0499</record_number>
		<author>Yalom, Irvin D.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Lying on the Couch</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Basic Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 277(1):83-84 by Steven S. Sharfstein, M.D., Sheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, Maryland. From the review: [This] is a satiric novel, exposing many of the foibles of psychoanalysis and existential psychotherapy. It is also about ethics--the so-called slippery slope of boundary violations as therapists are tempted to violate codes of behavior. It is a well-written tale of sex, money, confidentiality, managed care, and false memories, confronting the reader to think about these issues from the more immediate viewpoint of the characters in the novel. Humor relieves the tensions of the conflict of life vs therapy. For psychiatric clinicians, this book is a fascinating page-turner, difficult to put down. In addition to its being a good yarn, there is a lot to learn about technique and ethical boundaries. The ending is too sugar-coated for my taste, a neat, cut-and-dried redemptive series of solutions that undercut the messy realism of the issues posed.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, CASE STUDIES, FICTION, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>5/25/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0500</record_number>
		<author>Spece, Roy G., Jr., David S. Shimm, and Allen E. Buchanan, eds.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Practice and Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in the <I>New England Journal of Medicine</I> 336(7):518-519 and the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 277(12):1009. From the <I>JAMA</I> review (by Stanley B. Troup, M.D., University of Cincinnati Medical Center): This is a broad collection of invited essays from the fields of law, philosophy, ethics, public and environmental health, and, to a lesser degree, from clinical medicine. Few, if any, possible conflicts of interest in clinical care or clinical research are left unexamined. The first of the book's four sections represents a conceptual overview and includes philosophical considerations and matters of morality and law. . . . The second part of the book addresses conflicts of interest in clinical practice, with two particularly difficult and growing problems discussed in detail: the questions associated with entrepreneurial activities by physicians and, in a separate essay, physicians' conflicts of interests with health maintenance organizations and hospitals. Part 3 is a single essay on the potential and real conflicts of interest between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. The final portion deals with conflicts of interest in clinical research. . . . I believe <I>Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Practice and Research</I> is a valuable contribution in an area of growing concern and potential conflict.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, LAW, ETHICAL THEORY, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0501</record_number>
		<author>Jecker, Nancy S., Albert R. Jensen, and Robert A. Pearlman, eds.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics: An Introduction to the History, Methods, and Practice</I>.</title>
		<publication>Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 278(11):951 by Leo Uzych, J.D., M.P.H. From the review: This is a trifurcated, multiauthored bioethics textbook. Part 1 delves into the historic background of bioethics by reprinting articles, drawn mostly from the 1960s and 1970s, which comment on topics enmeshed with ethical concerns, including heart transplantation, euthanasia, and withholding treatment from severely ill infants... . Part 2 introduces readers to sundry methodologies applicable potentially to the defining and analysis of ethical matters, including anthropologic techniques, casuistry, feminist approaches, and a richer case narrative... . The triad is completed with a concluding part appertaining to the 'practice' of bioethics. As introduced in part 3, bioethics is actually practiced by various means, including hospital ethics committees and ethics consultants. The United States is a highly pluralistic society. A strength of the book is that it shows cognizance of this vital reality... . For persons desiring to get their feet wet in the waters of bioethics, this textbook provides a good, solid introduction to its history, methods, and practice. It reveals, however, merely the tip of the bioethics iceberg.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HISTORY, FEMINISM, DEATH, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0502</record_number>
		<author>Lock, Stephen, and Frank Wells, ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>2nd ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group.</publication>
		<annotation>Reviewed in the <I>Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 277(1):85-86 by David A. Kronick, Ph.D., University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. From the review: The appearance, in just 2 years, of the second edition of <I>Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research</I> (the first edition was reviewed in these pages January 26, 1994) is evidence of both continuing concem and the importance of the subject to the medical community... . This collection of papers is a considerably expanded discussion of the problems of fraud and misconduct in medical and biological research, although, as in the first edition, the emphasis is on clinical trials... . This revised and augmented collection of viewpoints on fraud and misconduct in scientific research provides additional stimulus to a discussion that undoubtedly will continue into the distant future.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, MISCONDUCT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0503</record_number>
		<author>Snyder, Lois, ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Choices: Case Studies for Medical Practice</I>.</title>
		<publication>Philadelphia: American College of Physicians.</publication>
		<annotation>From the publisher: Physicians and patients must grapple daily with ethical decisions. <I>Ethical Choices</I> presents issues in an easy-to-read case study format that physicians and other health care professionals will find relevant to day-to-day practice and patients will find critical to their health, welfare, and rights. More than a dozen issues are examined, including sexual relationships between physicians and patients; the impaired doctor; disclosure of errors; disputes between residents and attendings; financial incentives inherent in fee-for-service medicine versus managed care; patient preferences for referrals; and physician-assisted suicide. The case commentaries do not present absolutes, but use the unique aspects of each dilemma to forge a recommended course of action. Each case study is referenced; an annotated bibliography has been added to guide the reader to the latest and best sources of additional information. New and not-so-new physicians, housestaff, medical students and others who think about or teach bioethics will find the book a helpful guide to resolving ethical dilemmas. Patients will find it a window on the world of how they should be treated and how their doctors should act. <strong>Contents:</strong> Introduction to Medical Ethics; PART I, The Patient and the Physician: The Clinical Encounter (Physician-Assisted Suicide; Physician-Assisted Suicide Revisited: Comfort and Care at the End of Life; Ethics and Elder Neglect); PART II, The Patient and Physician: Non-clinical Dimensions of the Relationship (Referrals and Patient Wishes; Patient Prejudice; Disclosure of Errors and the Threat of Malpractice; Sex and the Single Physician); PART III, Medicine's Collective Obligations (Ethics and Medicaid Patients; The Duty to Treat HIV-Positive Patients; The Impaired Colleague; When Residents and Attendings Disagree; Medical Residents, Attendings, and Mistakes); PART IV, The Business of Medicine: Effects on the Patient-Physician Relationship (Financial Incentives and Physician Decision Making; Pharmaceutical Industry Support of Continuing Medical Education).</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, TRUTHTELLING, SUICIDE, DYING, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0505</record_number>
		<author>Pernick, Martin C.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>The Black Stork: Eugenics and Death of Defective Babies in American Medicine and Motion Pictures since 1915.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/24/1997</added>
		<modified>8/12/2002</modified>
		<record_number>0506</record_number>
		<author>Randall, Fiona, and R. S. Downie.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Palliative Care Ethics: A Good Companion</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/10/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0507</record_number>
		<author>Goodman, Billy.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Cornell Professor-Student Dispute Draws Attention to Broader Issues.</title>
		<publication><I>The Scientist</I>, 12(15):1 and 5-6.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the misappropriation of a junior scientist's research by a senior scientist.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, PLAGIARISM, MENTORING, MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, ACADEMIC ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/10/1998</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0508</record_number>
		<author>Bero, Lisa A.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Disclosure Policies for Gifts from Industry to Academic Faculty.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(13):1031-1032.</publication>
		<annotation>Outlines policies regarding corporate gifts to researchers.</annotation>
		<keywords>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/10/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0509</record_number>
		<author>Campbell, Eric G., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Looking a Gift Horse in the Mouth: Corporate Gifts Supporting Life Sciences Research.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(13):995-999.</publication>
		<annotation>Objective: To examine the frequency, importance, and potential implications of research-related gifts from companies.(From the authors.)</annotation>
		<keywords>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RESEARCH ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/10/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0510</record_number>
		<author>Nelsen, Lita.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Rise of Intellectual Property Protection in the American University.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 279 (Mar. 6):1460-1461.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks to explain the increase in the importance of intellectual property as representative of the larger changes in the relationship between society and research universities.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/10/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0512</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>The Mouse That Prompted a Roar.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 277 (July 4):24-25.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the issues surrounding Dupont's patent of the transgenic mice <I>Cre-loxP</I>.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, GENETIC RESEARCH, LAW, ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/10/1998</added>
		<modified>11/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0513</record_number>
		<author>Cho, Mildred K.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Secrecy and Financial Conflicts in University-Industry Research Must Get Closer Scrutiny.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Aug. 1:B4-B5.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/11/1998</added>
		<modified>11/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0514</record_number>
		<author>Brown, George E., Jr.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Defining Values for Research and Technology.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, July 10:B4.</publication>
		<annotation>Calls for the reformation of the culture of science itself, including changes in how scientists are evaluated and trained.</annotation>
		<keywords>POLICY, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, SCIENCE RESEARCH, GOVERNMENT FUNDING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/11/1998</added>
		<modified>11/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0515</record_number>
		<author>Woodward, James, and David Goodstein.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Conduct, Misconduct and the Structure of Science.</title>
		<publication><I>American Scientist</I>, 84:479-490.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the general society of science, how misconduct arises within this societal structure, and how to identify misconduct.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, FRAUD</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/11/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0516</record_number>
		<author>Holden, Constance, ed.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>New Ethics Code for German Scientists.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 280 (May 8):831.</publication>
		<annotation>Brief article describing the after shocks of a scientific misconduct case in Germany.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, AUTHORSHIP, POLICY, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/11/1998</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0517</record_number>
		<author>Coughlin, Steven S.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Model Curricula in Public Health Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Preventative Medicine</I>, 12(4):247-251.</publication>
		<annotation>Outlines the reasons for, difficulties with, and stratagies for designing curricula to teach public health ethics.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0518</record_number>
		<author>Schmidt, Peter.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>U. of Arizona Fires Prominent Researcher over Charges of Scientific Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Aug. 14:A12.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents the two sides of the firing of a prominent Alzheimer's researcher. They accuse her of scientific misconduct, and she accuses them of firing her as a warning to other researchers not to blow the whistle on administrators.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, WHISTLEBLOWING, CASE STUDIES, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0519</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Review Boards: A System in Jeopardy?</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 280 (June 19):1830.</publication>
		<annotation>Questions if the traditional IRB is adequate, praticularly in light of the increased case load of each IRB.</annotation>
		<keywords>IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD)</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0520</record_number>
		<author>Williams, Nigel.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Editors Call for Misconduct Watchdog.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 280 (June 12):1685-1686.</publication>
		<annotation>In England, journal editors and medical societies are calling for the establishment of a governmental watchdog of research ethics.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, FRAUD, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>11/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0521</record_number>
		<author>Price, Alan R.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Anonymity and Pseudonymity in Whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, 73(5):467-472.</publication>
		<annotation>In response to fears regarding how to handle whistleblowers who chose to remain anonymous, this article looks at the experiences of the Office of Research Intergrity from 1989-1997.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0522</record_number>
		<author>Kondro, Wayne.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>New Rules of Human Subjects Could End Debate in Canada.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 280 (June 5):1521.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the new governmental policies (of Canada) regarding research involving human subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, HUMAN SUBJECTS, POLICY, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0523</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Medline Searches Turn Up Cases of Suspected Plagiarism.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 279 (Jan. 23):473-474.</publication>
		<annotation>An author writing a book on scientific misconduct ends up discovering that searches of Web-based research search engines can turn up many nearly identical articles, flagging them as possible plagiarisms.</annotation>
		<keywords>PLAGIARISM, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, COMPUTERS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0524</record_number>
		<author>Youngner, Julius S.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Scientific Misconduct Process: A Scientist's View from the Inside.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(1):62-64.</publication>
		<annotation>Written by a panel member of the Research Integrity Adjudications Panel to address what he perceives as misperceptions by the public.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, PEER REVIEW, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0526</record_number>
		<author>Korenman, Stanley G., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Evaluation of the Research Norms of Scientists and Administrators Responsible for Academic Research Intergrity.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(1):41-48.</publication>
		<annotation>To characterize the professional norms of active scientists and compare them with those of individuals with institutional responsibility for the conduct of research. (from the authors).</annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0527</record_number>
		<author>Williams, Nigel.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Editors Seek Ways to Cope with Fraud.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 278:1221.</publication>
		<annotation>Describes the reason for the formation of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, POLICY, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0528</record_number>
		<author>Kaiser, Jocelyn, ed.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Home for Scientific Whistleblowers.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 277 (Sept. 12):1611.</publication>
		<annotation>Describes the formation of the group Whistleblowers for Integrity in Science and Education (WISE) a support network for whistleblowers.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0529</record_number>
		<author>Gunsalus, C.K.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Lessons from the Trenches.</title>
		<publication><I>The Scientist</I>, Nov. 10:9.</publication>
		<annotation>A forthright discussion of the authors attitudes formed from experience regarding the handling of problems regarding academic integrity.</annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0530</record_number>
		<author>Kiernan, Vincent.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Studies of Cross-Species Transplants Raise Patients' Hopes and Ethicists' Fears.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Aug. 7:A16-A17.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the adavntages to and problems presented by xenotransplantation.</annotation>
		<keywords>XENOGRAFT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0531</record_number>
		<author>Koenig, Robert.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Panel Calls Falsification in German Case 'Unprecedented'.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 277 (Aug. 15):894.</publication>
		<annotation>Describes a situation unfolding in Germany, in which it has become evident that two biomedical researchers have falsified data in 30+ articles.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, FRAUD, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, PUBLISHING, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0532</record_number>
		<author>Parrish, Debra M.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Improving the Scientific Misconduct Hearing Process.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 277(16):1315-1319.</publication>
		<annotation>A criticism of the current scientific misconduct hearing process, as well as suggestions on how to improve it.</annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/14/1998</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0533</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>At Wisconsin, Zoo Monkeys Killed for Research.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Sept. 5:A12.</publication>
		<annotation>News blurb covering the story that Univeristy of Wisconsin researchers had been using zoo monkeys for research purposes, in violation of a statute protecting them.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0534</record_number>
		<author>Beck, Alan M.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>The Common Qualities of Man and Beast.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, May 17:B3.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues that scientists should not shy away from anthropomorphism, rather it should be used to both design more effective experiments as well as guide the experimentors to be more ethical in their treatment of the subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0535</record_number>
		<author>Stewart, F.E.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Is It Ethical for Medical Men to Patent Medical Inventions?</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 278(10):816b.</publication>
		<annotation>A reprint by JAMA of an article from 1897, which questions if physicians can ethically patent an invention.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, HISTORY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0536</record_number>
		<author>Magner, Denise P.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>'Postdocs', Seeing Little Way into the Academic Job Market, Seek Better Terms in the Lab.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Aug. 7:A10-A12.</publication>
		<annotation>Describes the shift of postdoctoral fellows from being cheap labor to attempting to organize to improve their lot.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENERAL, COMPENSATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0537</record_number>
		<author>Teller, Edward.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Science and Morality.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 280 (May 2):1200-1201.</publication>
		<annotation>A personal story about the politics of the development of the hydrogen bomb by one of its designers.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLITICS, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0538</record_number>
		<author>Finn, Robert.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Be Advised: Your E-mail Is Not as Private as It May Seem.</title>
		<publication><I>The Scientist</I>, Dec. 8:13-14.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses how E-mail is a relatively insecure and problematic form of interpersonal communication.</annotation>
		<keywords>DATA MANAGEMENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, COMPUTERS, DATA MONITORING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>11/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0539</record_number>
		<author>Hale, Alan.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Shattered Hopes and Dreams: The Dim Prospects for Careers in Science.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I> Dec. 5:B7.</publication>
		<annotation>The discoverer of Hale-Bopp comet discusses the difficulties of the academic scientific job market.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENERAL</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/15/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0540</record_number>
		<author>Haworth, Karla.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Publishers Press Colleges to Stop Software Piracy by Their Students.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, July 11:A19-A20.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the issue of responsiblity for piracy when students use university computers.</annotation>
		<keywords>COMPUTERS, CRIME, ETHICS AND TECHNOLOGY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, COPYRIGHT, CASE STUDIES, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0541</record_number>
		<author>Kaiser, Jocelyn.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Fisher Wins $2.75 Million Settlement.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 277:1425.</publication>
		<annotation>Quick news blurb covering the settlement of a lawsuit brought against the National Cancer Institute and the University of Pittsburg by a former researcher who was fired after fraud was discovered in his research group, fraud which he was later found to have no part in.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, CASE STUDIES, LAW, COMPENSATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0542</record_number>
		<author>Marwick, Charles.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Bioethics Group Considers Transnational Research.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(18):1425.</publication>
		<annotation>Covers the discussion surrounding the use and ethics of clinical trials in developing nations.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, WOMEN, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0543</record_number>
		<author>Angell, Marcia.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>The Ethics of Clinical Research in the Third World.</title>
		<publication><I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 337(12):847-849.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers insight into the ethics surrounding randomized clinical trials in developing nations.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0544</record_number>
		<author>Lurie, Peter, and Sidney M. Wolfe.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Unethical Trials of Interventions to Reduce Perinatal Transmission of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Developing Countries.</title>
		<publication><I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 337(12):853-856.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues against the ethics of placebo trials in developing countries and calls for a uniform ethical standard for international research.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0545</record_number>
		<author>Varmus, Harold, and David Satcher.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Ethical Complexities of Conducting Research in Developing Countries.</title>
		<publication><I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 337(14):1003-1005.</publication>
		<annotation>Argues more in support of placebo clinical trials in developing nations, offering arguments that this practice is ethically justified.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0547</record_number>
		<author>Cohen, Jon.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>No Consensus on Rules for AIDS Vaccine Trials.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 281:22-23.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the difficulties the experts are having in deciding on rules governing possible vaccine trials for HIV, particularly with regard to subjects in developing nations.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0548</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>NIH Examines Standards of Consent.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 280 (June 12):1688.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the new guidelines for consent being forwarded by the NIH and the National Institute of Mental Health.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, POLICY, INFORMED CONSENT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0549</record_number>
		<author>Basinger, Julianne.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>To Scientists Who Use Paying Volunteers in Fieldwork, the Benefits Outweigh the Bother.</title>
		<publication><I>The Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, June 19:A14-A15.</publication>
		<annotation>Gives several examples of researchers using paid volunteers, and their impressions about this source of help.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, COMPENSATION, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0550</record_number>
		<author>Voelker, Rebecca.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Is Informed Consent Voluntary?</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(18):1429.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at a study that hypothesized that most in-hospital research subjects felt pressured to be part of hospital-based studies.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0551</record_number>
		<author>Marwick, Charles.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Improved Protection for Human Research Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(5):344-345.</publication>
		<annotation>Looks at the proposals by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission aimed at improving the lot of human research subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY, RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0552</record_number>
		<author>Shuster, Evelyne.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code.</title>
		<publication><I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 337(20):1436-1440.</publication>
		<annotation>Offers a copy of the Nuremberg Code and looks at the ramifications it has had since its inception.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CODES OF RESEARCH ETHICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/17/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0553</record_number>
		<author>Rowan, Andrew N.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>The Benefits and Ethics of Animal Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Scientific American</I>, 276(2):79.</publication>
		<annotation>The ways in which scientists experiment on animals - and the question of whether they should do so at all - have been hotly controversial for decades, inside and outside the laboratory. An animal-loving public despises inhuman inhuman abuses of creatures, yet it also values the biomedical progress that results. Researchers defend animal experimentation as a necessary evil but can also be personally troubled by the suffering they cause. These articles crystallize some of the arguments voiced on both sides and look at the forces driving change in animal experimentation.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/15/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0554</record_number>
		<author>Stephenson, Joan.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Ethics Group Drafts Guidelines for Control of Genetic Material and Information.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(3):184.</publication>
		<annotation>Tells about the ethical issues being considered by a panel of ethicists called by the Human Genome Organization (HUGO).</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, STORED TISSUE, GENETIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0556</record_number>
		<author>Nightingale, Stuart L.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>List of Disqualified Investigators Available on Internet.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(1):9.</publication>
		<annotation>Gives the web address of a list of researchers who have been disqualified from clinical research for the FDA. The address is http://www.fda.gov/oha/list2.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0557</record_number>
		<author>Rennie, Drummond, and Annette Flanagin.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Congress on Medical Peer Review: History, Ethics, and Plans for the Future.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):213.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, HISTORY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0558</record_number>
		<author>Rennie, Drummond.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Peer Review in Prague.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):214-215.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0559</record_number>
		<author>Wilcox, Linda J.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Authorship: The Coin of the Realm, the Source of Complaints.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):216-217.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0560</record_number>
		<author>Hoen, Wendela P., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>What Are the Factors Determining Authorship and the Order of the Authors' Names?: A Study among Authors of the <I>Nederlands Tijdschrisft voor Geneeskunde</I> (<I>Dutch Journal of Medicine</I>).</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 280(3):217-218.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0561</record_number>
		<author>Drenth, Joost P.H.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Multiple Authorship: The Contribution of the Senior Authors.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):219-221.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0562</record_number>
		<author>Flanagin, Annette.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Prevalence of Articles with Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 280(3):222-224.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH ETHICS, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0563</record_number>
		<author>Krimsky, Sheldon, and L. S. Rothenberg.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Financial Interest and Its Disclosure in Scientific Publications.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):225-226.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CONFLICT OF INTEREST, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0564</record_number>
		<author>Purcell, Gretchen P., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Changes to Manuscripts during the Editorial Process: Characterizing the Evolution of a Clinical Paper.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):227-228.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0565</record_number>
		<author>Callaham, Michael L., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Reliability of Editors' Subjective Quality Ratings of Peer Reviews of Manuscripts.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):229-231.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0566</record_number>
		<author>Black, Nick, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>What Makes a Good Reviewer and a Good Review for a General Medical Journal?</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):231-233.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0567</record_number>
		<author>van Rooyan, Susan, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review: A Randomized Trial.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):234-237.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0568</record_number>
		<author>Godlee, Fiona, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewer and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports: A Randomized Controlled Trial.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):237-239.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/23/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0569</record_number>
		<author>Justice, Amy C., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Does Unmasking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 280(3):240-242.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0570</record_number>
		<author>Cho, Mildred K., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Masking Author Identity in Peer Review: What Factors Influence Masking Success?</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):243-245.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING, AUTHORSHIP</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0571</record_number>
		<author>Link, Ann M.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>US and Non-US Submissions: An Analysis of Reviewer Bias.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):246-247.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0572</record_number>
		<author>Junker, Christoph A.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Adherence to Published Standards of Reporting: A Comparison of Placebo-Controlled Trials Published in English or German.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 280(3):247-249.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0573</record_number>
		<author>Misakian, Anastasia L., and Lisa A. Bero.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Publication Bias on Research on Passive Smoking: Comparison of Published and Unpublished Studies.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 280(3):250-253.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0574</record_number>
		<author>Callaham, Michael L., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):254-257.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0575</record_number>
		<author>Weber, Ellen J., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Unpublished Research from a Medical Specialty Meeting: Why Investigators Fail to Publish.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):257-259.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0576</record_number>
		<author>Dickersin, Kay, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Is There a Sex Bias in Choosing Editors?: Epidemiology Journals as an Example.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):260-264.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, GENDER</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0577</record_number>
		<author>Joyce, John, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Reviewing the Reviews: The Example of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):264-266.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0578</record_number>
		<author>Pitkin, Roy M., and Mary Ann Branagan.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Can the Accuracy of Abstracts Be Improved by Providing Specific Instructions?: A Randomized Controlled Trial.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I> 280(3):267-269.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0579</record_number>
		<author>Scherer, Roberta, and Barbara Crawley.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trial Descriptors and Use of Structured Abstracts.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):269-272.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0580</record_number>
		<author>Hatch, Christopher L., and Steven N. Goodman.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Perceived Value of Providing Peer Reviewers with Abstracts and Preprints of Related Published and Unpublished Papers.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):273-274.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0581</record_number>
		<author>Jefferson, Tom, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Evaluating the <I>BMJ</I> Guidelines for Economic Submissions: Prospective Audit of Economic Submissions to <I>BMJ</I> and <I> the Lancet</I>.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):275-277.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0582</record_number>
		<author>Jadad, Alejandro R., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: A Comparison of the Cochrane Reviews with Articles Published in Paper-Based Journals.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):278-280.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0583</record_number>
		<author>Clarke, Michael, and Iain Chalmers.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Discussion Sections in Reports of Controlled Trials Published in General Medical Journals: Islands in Search of Continents?</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):280-282.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0584</record_number>
		<author>Wang, Qinn, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Research Design and Statistical Methods in Chinese Medical Journals.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):283-285.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0585</record_number>
		<author>Garrow, John, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Reported Training and Experience of Editors in Chief of Specialist Clinical Medical Journals.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):286-287.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0586</record_number>
		<author>Lundberg, George D., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>A Comparison of the Opinions of Experts and Readers as to What Topics a General Medical Journal (<I>JAMA</I>) Should Address.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):288-290.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0587</record_number>
		<author>Olson, Carin M., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Studying Submissions to a Medical Journal.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):290-291.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0588</record_number>
		<author>Girardi, Enrico, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Peer-Reviewed Articles and Public Health: The Mad Cow Affair in Italian Newspapers.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):292-294.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PEER REVIEW, PUBLISHING, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0589</record_number>
		<author>de Semir, Vladimer, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Press Releases of Science Journal Articles and Subsequent Newspaper Stories on the Same Topic.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):294-295.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0590</record_number>
		<author>Budd, John M., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Phenomena of Retraction: Reasons for Retraction and Citations to the Publications.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):296-297.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0591</record_number>
		<author>Horton, Richard.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Journal Ombudsperson: A Step toward Scientific Press Oversight.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):298-299.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>11/20/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0592</record_number>
		<author>Rennie, Drummond.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Freedom and Responsibility in Medical Publication: Setting the Balance Right.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 280(3):300-302.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0593</record_number>
		<author>Rankin, Marlene, and Maureen D. Estevez</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title>Perceptions of Scientific Misconduct in Nursing.</title>
		<publication><I>Nursing Research</I>, 46(5):270.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0594</record_number>
		<author>Rest, James, et al.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>Designing and Validating a Measure of Moral Judgement: Stage Preference and Stage Consistency Approaches.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Educational Psychology</I>, 89(1):5.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0595</record_number>
		<author>Smith, Richard.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Need for a National Body for Research Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>British Medical Journal</I>, 316(7146):1686.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0596</record_number>
		<author>Swazey, Judith P.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Research Integrity: Why It Matters.</title>
		<publication><I>Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy.</I></publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/24/1998</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0598</record_number>
		<author>Pence, Gregory E.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Who’s Afraid of Human Cloning?</I></title>
		<publication>Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CLONING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/28/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0599</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Cloning: Public Policy in Legal, Religious, and Philosophical Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>Valparaiso University Law Review</I>, Special Issuse, 32(2):349-792.</publication>
		<annotation>This is a special issue dedicated to issues surrounding cloning. Contributers are: Geri J. Yonover, John Finnis, Robert F. Blomquist, Catherine Cookson, Heidi Forster/Emily Ramsey, Clarke D. Forsythe, Michael J. McDaniel, Robert C.L. Moffat, Courtney S. Campbell, Daniel R. Heimbach, Jan C. Heller, Leon R. Kass, Gilbert Meilander, James L. Nelson, Kenneth D. Pimple, Kurt A. Richardson, Maura A. Ryan, and Thomas A. Shannon.</annotation>
		<keywords>CLONING, POLICY, LAW, RELIGION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/28/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0600</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>The Human Use of Animals: Case Studies in Ethical Choice</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The first set of case studies on animal use, this volume offers a thorough, up-to-date exploration of the moral issues related to animal welfare. Its main purpose is to examine how far it is ethically justifiable to harm animals in order to benefit mankind. An excellent introduction provides a framework for the cases and sets the background of philosophical and moral concepts underlying the subject. Sixteen origninal, previously unpublished essays cover controversies associated with the human use of animals in a broad range of contexts, including biomedical, behavioral, and wildlife research, cosmetic safety testing, education, the food industry, commerce, and animals used as pets and in religious practices. Scientific research is accorded the closest scrutiny. The authors represent a wide range of expertise within their specialized areas of research: physiology, public policy, ethics, philosophy, law, veterinary science, and psychology. The careful analysis of each case makes it possible to elevate the discourse beyond over-simplified positions, and to demonstrate the complexity of the issues. <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> will be welcomed by students and faculty in law, philosophy, ethics, public policy, religion, medicine, and veterinary medicine. It will also interest activists in the animal protection movement and members of animal protection organizations and Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. (from the back cover of the book)</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, POLICY, LAW, PSYCHOLOGY, ETHICS INSTRUCTION,</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0601</record_number>
		<author>Anspach, Renee R.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive Care Nursery</I>.</title>
		<publication>Berkley: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CHILDREN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0604</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Animal Sacrifice as Religious Ritual: The Santeria Case.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, CASE STUDIES, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0606</record_number>
		<author>Keown, John.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Euthanasia Examined: Ethical, Clinical and Legal Perspectives</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0607</record_number>
		<author>Kuczewski, Mark G.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Fragmentation and Consensus: Communitarian and Casuist Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0608</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Patenting Animals: The Harvard 'Oncomouse'.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0609</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Beauty without the Beast.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0610</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Apes and Language: Washoe and Her Successors.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>5/29/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0611</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Can Animal Aggression Be Studied in an Ethical Manner?</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0612</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Monkeys without Mothers.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0613</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Death of a Vagrant Bird.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0614</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Dissection of Frogs: The Jenifer Graham Case.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0615</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Force-Feeding of Geese.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0616</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Veal Crates and Human Palates.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0617</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Fowl Deeds.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0618</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Should the Tail Wag the Dog?</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/29/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0619</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Where Should Research Scientists Get Their Dogs?</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/30/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0620</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Head Injury Experiments on Primates at the University of Pennsylvania.</title>
		<publication>In <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/30/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0621</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Baboon-Human Liver Transplants: The Pittsburg Case.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>XENOGRAFT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>9/30/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0622</record_number>
		<author>Orlans, F. Barbara, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Moral Issues about Animals.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Human Use of Animals</I> ed. Orlans, F. Barbara, et al. New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>7/25/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0623</record_number>
		<author>Voelker, Rebecca.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>New Ethics Manual.</title>
		<publication><I>The Journal of the American Medical Association</I>, 279(16):1249.</publication>
		<annotation>Announces the release of a fourth edition of the American College of Physicians' (ACP) Ethics Manual. It is available on the internet at http://www.acponline.org/journals/annals.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0624</record_number>
		<author>Bloom, Floyd E.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Rightness of Copyright.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 281(Sept. 4):1451.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the relinquishment of copyright to publishers by researchers funded by the government.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0626</record_number>
		<author>Greenberg, Samuel I.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Psychosocial Issues.</I></title>
		<publication>Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, SUICIDE, PSYCHOLOGY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0628</record_number>
		<author>Ashley, Benedict M., and Kevin D. O'Rourke.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Health Care Ethics: A Theological Analysis</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown Univerisity Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0629</record_number>
		<author>Monagle. John F., and David C. Thomasma.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Health Care Ethics: Critical Issues for the 21st Century.</I></title>
		<publication>Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0630</record_number>
		<author>Gert, Bernard, et al.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0632</record_number>
		<author>Murphy, Edmond A., et al.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Underpinnings of Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Readers of this volume might benefit in two ways. First, the authors are scholars with an encyclopedic breadth of knowledge; thus, anyone who reads their text will undoubtedly be introduced to new information. Second, the authors often do make points that seem both useful and beneficial. Weaknesses: turgid,  confusing,  and unclear purpose. (from JAMA 280(5):480-481 review)</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/9/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0633</record_number>
		<author>La Puma, John.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Managed Care Ethics: Essays on the Impact of Managed Care on Traditional Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Hatherleigh Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/12/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0634</record_number>
		<author>Rothstein, Mark A., ed.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Genetic Secrets: Protecting Privacy and Confidentiality in the Genetic Era</I>.</title>
		<publication>New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.</publication>
		<annotation><I>Genetic Secrets</I> deals with issues of privacy arising from the use of the new forms of technology within our society. The authors review comprehensively this difficult and challenging field. from the review in JAMA 339(2):135-134.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), INFORMED CONSENT, HUMAN SUBJECTS, LAW, GENETIC SCREENING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0635</record_number>
		<author>Kilner, John F., Rebecca D. Pentz, and Frank E. Young, ed.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Genetic Ethics: Do the Ends Justify the Genes?</I></title>
		<publication>Grand Rapids, MI: Paternoster Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Puts forth a Christian viewpoint on the new technology. Topics discussed in the book are wide ranging, but those dealing with prenatal diagnosis, eugenics, and the Christian perspective on gene therapy I found of particular interest. from a review in JAMA 339(2):135-136.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, RELIGION, HUMAN GENE THERAPY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0636</record_number>
		<author>Feldman, Marc D., and Jacqueline M Feldman with Roxenne Smith.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Stranger Than Fiction: When Our Minds Betray Us</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The authors have written more than just another brain and mental illness book, but rather a well-crafted and illustrated clinical discussion of often seen psychiatric symptomology from a review in JAMA 279(23):1918-1919.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0637</record_number>
		<author>Firstman, Richard, and Jamie Talan.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>The Death of Innocents: A True Story of Murder, Medicine, and High-Stakes Science</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Bantam Books.</publication>
		<annotation>Deals with SIDS. This book is a most absorbing way to be reminded of the pitfalls of clinical investigation and how to avoid them by involving a diverse research team and listening to their conclusions from a review in <I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 338(24):1778.</annotation>
		<keywords>HISTORY, RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0638</record_number>
		<author>Tomes, Nancy.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>The Gospel of Germs: Men, Women, and the Microbe in American Life</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Nancy Tomes describes how the germ theory led to the spread across the United States of what she calls 'the gospel of germs'… It [the book] gives a vital perspective for comprehending the continuing problems that infectious disease poses for society and public health. from a review in <I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I> 338(21):1551.</annotation>
		<keywords>HISTORY, WOMEN, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0639</record_number>
		<author>Jonsen, Albert R., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Clinical Ethics: A Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: McGraw-Hill.</publication>
		<annotation><I>Clinical Ethics</I> should continue as a prime contender when a condensed, clinical ethics text is desired from a review in JAMA 279(22):1839-1840.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0640</record_number>
		<author>Squire, Larry R., ed.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title><I>The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography</I>, Vol. 1.</title>
		<publication>San Diego: Academic Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Anyone interested in the history of science in this century will find the 17 autobiographical essays collected in volume one of <I>The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography</I> rich both in facts and in the sociology of science. from a review in <I>Science</I>, 280(1998):1032.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0641</record_number>
		<author>Caplan, Arthur L.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Am I My Brother's Keeper?: The Ethical Frontiers of Biomedicine</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>An educated friend with no background in medicine, law, or ethics asked me to recommend a book that would introduce him to rational discourse in bioethics without putting him to sleep. I can recommend this book to such a novice at the same time as I find it informative and thought-provoking for someone such as myself who has spent most of his adult life thinking about these issues from a review by Norman Fost in <I>Issues in Science and Technology</I>, Summer, 1998.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0642</record_number>
		<author>Shem, Samuel.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Mount Misery</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Fawcett Columbine.</publication>
		<annotation><I>Mount Misery</I>manages through hyperbole to trash all forms of psychiatric treatment except 'connectedness' from a review in <I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 338(20):1476.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, FICTION, PSYCHOLOGY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/13/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0643</record_number>
		<author>Murphy, Timothy F.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Gay Science: The Ethics of Sexual Orientation Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Columbia University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Bioethicist Timothy Murphy provides the reader with an argument in support of freedom of etiologic research on sexual orientation from a review in JAMA 279(20):1664.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, WOMEN, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0644</record_number>
		<author>Kennedy, Donald.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Academic Duty</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</publication>
		<annotation><I>Academic Duty</I> can be profitably read by people both inside and outside of the academy. The author knows educational institutions, and, from his rich experience as president of Stanford, he engages in a critical discussion about our obligations to both students and society from a review by William W. May in <I>Issues in Science and Technology</I>, Spring 1998.</annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, TRUTHTELLING, TEACHING ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, MENTORING, FREEDOM OF INQUIRY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0645</record_number>
		<author>Martin, Richard, et al.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>The Doctor's Dilemma: Essentials of Medical Ethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Tampa: Gold Standard Multimedia.</publication>
		<annotation>CD-ROM. <I>The Doctor's Dilemma</I> CD-ROM contains a wealth of easily accessible information about the ethical issues that each of us confronts in our daily work. It will be valuable to physicians, nurses, and hospital administrators, for it reinforces the fact the the profession of medicine is a moral enterprise from a review by Bernard H. Adelson in JAMA 279(14):1123-1124.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION, VIDEO, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0646</record_number>
		<author>Zucker, Marjorie B., and Howard D. Zucker.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Medical Futility and the Evaluation of Life-Sustaining Interventions</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Overall, this book provides a good, basic introduction to an important topic in bioethics. from a review by Daniel P. Sulmasy in <I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I>, 338(14):997.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0647</record_number>
		<author>Fadiman, Ann.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down: A Hmong Child, Her American Doctors, and the Collision of Two Cultures</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York, : Farrar, Straus and Giroux.</publication>
		<annotation>I recommend this book whole-heartedly to anyone, but particularly to those interested in issues in cross-cultural medicine from a review by David H. Mark in JAMA 279(6):477.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, CHILDREN, RELIGION, MINORITY POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0648</record_number>
		<author>Thomasma, David C., and Thomasine Kushner, ed.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title><I>Birth to Death: Science and Bioethics.</I></title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The myriad bioethical prespectives presented in this volume--especially on some topics often lacking in bioethical discussion--are themselves engaging and readable. I only suggest that readers think critically not only about what is offered, but also about the topics and perspectives that are not from a review by Lisa S. Parker in JAMA 279(3):243-244.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, ANIMALS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, SUICIDE, DEATH, GENETIC TESTING, GYNECOLOGY, DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0649</record_number>
		<author>Hertzman, Marc, and Douglas E. Feltner, ed.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>The Handbook of Psychopharmacology Trials: An Overview of Scientific, Political, and Ethical Concerns</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: New York University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>I do not recommend this book as the definitive publication on psychopharmacology chapters. However, it may be a good idea to check it out from the library to review the state of the art of some psychopharmacology trials … or some thought-provoking chapters from a review by Jose De Leon in <I>The New England Journal of Medicine</I> 338(3):205-206.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLITICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, WOMEN, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0650</record_number>
		<author>Coughlin, Steven S.</author>
		<date>1997</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Epidemiology and Public Health Practice: Collected Works</I>.</title>
		<publication>Quill Publications.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0651</record_number>
		<author>Reeter, Alan K., and Kenneth V. Iserson.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Healthcare</I>.</title>
		<publication>Tucson: Medfilms.</publication>
		<annotation>12 min. in length. Includes 13-pg. Instructional Guide with Transcript. ($230)</annotation>
		<keywords>VIDEO, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/14/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0653</record_number>
		<author>Bachrach, Steven, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Who Should Own Scientific Papers?</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 281 (Sept. 4):1459-1460.</publication>
		<annotation>An argument that publicly funded research should be disseminated freely, particularly in light of the ease of such a task with the world wide web and other electronic communication networks.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, RESEARCH ETHICS, PUBLISHING, POLICY, GOVERNMENT FUNDING, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>10/23/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0654</record_number>
		<author>Zurer, Pamela.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>NSF, Paquette Settle Misconduct Case.</title>
		<publication><I>Chemical and Engineering News</I>, Mar. 9:25-26.</publication>
		<annotation>This article discusses the details of the case against Ohio State University Chemistry professor Leo A. Paquette by the NSF. Dr. Paquette was found to have plagiarized the introduction section from an NSF proposal he was peer-reviewing, and then later falsified evidence to cover up his plagiarism. In the end, the NSF and Dr. Paquette's lawyers settled, with Dr. Paquette being eliminated from any NSF funding for a period of three years.</annotation>
		<keywords>PLAGIARISM, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, CASE STUDIES, DECEPTION, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, CHEMISTRY, PEER REVIEW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0655</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Confusion in a Jar.</title>
		<publication>Nova Series (1391) produced by WGBH-TV distributed by Coronet Films.</publication>
		<annotation>Highlight the cold fusion controversy, explores the implications of fusion as a source of energy, and shows why the reproducibility of scientific results is so important to any major discovery. Follows the attempts of scientists to independently verify the experiments conducted by Stanley Pons at the University of Utah and Marvin Fleischmann at England's University of Southampton, demonstrating nuclear fusion at room temperature. Explains that Pons and Fleischmann's claims have been largely discredited because of lack of formal documentation. from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0656</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>The Deadly Deception: The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.</title>
		<publication>Nova Series (1391) distributed by Films for the Humanities and Sciences.</publication>
		<annotation>An investigation of the infamous Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis in the negro male, a medical experiment conducted in Alabama from 1932 to 1972 in which patients were led to believe that they were receiving treatment for their illness, but in actuality were merely observed to follow the progress of the disease. from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HISTORY, HUMAN SUBJECTS, TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS STUDY, MINORITY POPULATIONS, DECEPTION, RESEARCH ETHICS, THERAPEUTIC OBLIGATIONS, CASE STUDIES, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0657</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Do Scientist's Cheat?</title>
		<publication>Nova Series (1391) produced by WGBH-TV and distributed by Coronet Films.</publication>
		<annotation>Examines why scientific fraud is so hard to detect and details the numerous factors that influence fraud, including an increasing competition for grant money and tenured positions. Discusses why scientists may be less than honest, analyzes how our scientific system deals with quality control, and considers the adequacy of the scientific community's response when a researcher is involved in fraud from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, RESEARCH ETHICS, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0658</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1992</date>
		<title>Ethical Issues in Scientific Research.</title>
		<publication>Produced by Research Triangle Park Club Sigma Xi, distributed by Telemedia.</publication>
		<annotation>Videotaped from a 1991 forum, Ethical Issues in Scientific Research. From government, industry and academe, a group of distinguished scientists and professionals dealing with scientific issues respond to various scenarios depicting real-life ethical dilemmas. The goal in these scenarios is not to provide a clear-cut distinction between right and wrong, but rather to present several viewpoints reagarding a particular issue. May also serve as a useful supplement to a program of instruction in laboratory morality and scientific ethics. Joe Graedon, author and syndicated commentator on health-related topics, serves as moderator for the program. Some of the issues covered are authorship of research articles, peer review, data handling, social responsibility of research, scientific fraud, and reporting research to the public from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, VIDEO, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES, AUTHORSHIP, PEER REVIEW, DATA MANAGEMENT, FRAUD, PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0659</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>Human Guinea Pigs: Secret Drug Tests on American Soldiers.</title>
		<publication>Produced by Yorkshire Television, distributed by Films for the Humanities and Sciences.</publication>
		<annotation>Criticizes the ethics of the US Army's program of experimental drug testing, which was performed on American soldiers and civilians between 1951 and 1975. Uses interviews with former servicemen who were subjects, a physician who had supervised testing at Edgewood Arsenal, and the US Army's own documentary footage of experiments. Presents the Army's reasons for conducting the tests, the subjects' memories of the experience and subsequent health problems, and information on legal action taken by the subjects and their relatives from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, VIDEO, SECRECY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0660</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1989</date>
		<title>In Defense of Animals: A Portrait of Peter Singer.</title>
		<publication>Produced by Judy Akeret, and distributed by Bullfrog Films.</publication>
		<annotation>Introduces Peter Singer, the world-renowned philosopher and activist who has come to be known as father of the animal liberation movement. Discusses the genesis of Singer's ideas concerning animal experimentation and factory farming as outlined in his popular book, <I>Animal Liberation</I>, and shows how these ideas have affected his personal life. Includes footage showing painful experiments, such as the Draize eye test for rabbits, and showing the deplorable conditions under which chicken and veal are produced from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, VIDEO</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0661</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>The Lynchberg Story.</title>
		<publication>Produced by Bruce Eadie, and distributed by Filmakers Library.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the theory of eugenics and the forced sterilization of over 8, 000 people at the Lynchberg Colony of Virginia from 1927 to 1972. Examines the background of the theory of race preservation, its popular acceptance in pre-World War II society, and the Supreme Court case that opened the way for mass sterilization in the United States. Emphasizes that many, if not most, sterilizations were performed to reduce the incidence of feeble mindedness, whose victims included the poor, the uneducated, girls who had been raped, and others who were felt to be socially undesirable. Speaks with several people who were sterilized about the experience and the effect it had on their lives from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, VIDEO, CASE STUDIES, HISTORY, HUMAN SUBJECTS, CHILDREN, WOMEN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/2/1998</added>
		<modified>4/4/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0662</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Maxine Singer.</title>
		<publication>In the Bill Moyers' World of Ideas Series (1742), produced by Betsy McCarthy, and distributed by PBS Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents an interview between Bill Moyers and Maxine Singer, a biologist specializing in genetics who is also president of Carnegie Institution in Washington. Features Dr. Singer's special concerns about the ethics of science and the dilemmas of choice, focusing on the consequences that accompy scientific research. Discusses her work as organizer of the Asilomer Conference in 1975, where she and other scientists drew up guidelines for the ethics of genetic research from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, VIDEO, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0663</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1993</date>
		<title>The Mouse That Laid the Golden Egg.</title>
		<publication>in <I>The Secrets of Life Series</I> (2090), produced by WGBH-TV and the BBC, and distributed by Films for the Arts and Humanities.</publication>
		<annotation>Explores the ethical questions surrounding recent developments in genetic engineering in which animals of one species are given genes of another for specific medical and economic purposes. Presents basic explanantions with demonstrations of the techniques and concepts involved while discussing both the possible positive medical benefits and the ethical arguments against this technology. Uses interviews with representatives from the National Wildlife Federation, the Humane Society, several genetic engineering companies, and activist Jerome Rifkin as well as narration by David Suzuki from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, VIDEO, GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0664</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1991</date>
		<title>Penicillin: Discovering the Truth.</title>
		<publication>Produced by David Dugin and Oliver Morse, distributed by Films for the Humanities and Sciences.</publication>
		<annotation>Uses archival film footage, narration, and interviews to present the history of Penicillin, contrasting the true story of how Penicillin developed with the many myths that have attributed the discovery and development of the antibiotic to Alexander Fleming. Explains how Fleming stumbled on Penicillin and its effects by accident in 1928, and did so little investigative work and laboratory tests that he remained unaware of the potential benefits of the medicine. Shows how the work and research of Austrian pathologist Howard Florey and German biochemist Ernst Chain were responsible for the eventual understanding and development of the drug which led to its use in human subjects in the late 1930s and early 1940s. Profiles a number of other scientists and technicians who aided them in their research. Explains the difficulties the scientists had in getting drug companies to produce and research the drug, but how that situation eventually changed due to World War II and the huge number of soldiers being wounded and infected. Discusses the politics behind accrediting the development of penicillin to the correct scientists from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, HISTORY, VIDEO, POLITICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0665</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>Science and Sacrilege: Native Americans, Archaeology, and the Law.</title>
		<publication>Produced by Nicholas Nicastro, and distributed by University of California Extension Media Center.</publication>
		<annotation>In New York state, examines the debate over the Native American Graves Protection Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), a law passed in 1990 in response to prejudicial archaeological practices resulting in desecration of Indian graves and burial sites. Presents arguments and responses from archaeologists, academics, and Native Americans. Outlines the effects of the law which forces archaeologists to communicate with the Native Americans and also to inventory their collections. Highlights the differences in social anthropologists and archaeologists. Sits in on a review committee to illustrate that the differences between beleifs and science are not resolved from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>LAW, ARCHAEOLOGY, VIDEO, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0666</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1988</date>
		<title>Sissela Bok.</title>
		<publication>In the Bill Moyers' World of Ideas Series, produced by Catherine Tatge, and distributed by PBS Video.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents an interview between Bill Moyers and philosopher Sissela Bok. Discusses her writings, which explore the psychology of lying, the consequences of deception, and the perils of keeping secrets. Examines why politicians and all leader must keep the public trust and offers Bok's experienced observations on peaceful chang. from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>SECRECY, ETHICAL THEORY, VIDEO, DECEPTION, APOLITICS, PROFESSIONA ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1998</added>
		<modified>4/4/2003</modified>
		<record_number>0667</record_number>
		<author>National Science Foundation.</author>
		<date>1996</date>
		<title>A Stampede of Zebras.</title>
		<publication>Produced by The National Science Foundation, and distributed by Duke University Center for Applied Ethics.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents a dramatization concerning six scientists in an academic endocrinology laboratory in which the head of the laboratory and the main researcher are more concerned with building their scientific reputations than with producing proper and honest scientific investigations. Shows a junior researcher in the lab beginning to have suspicions regarding the validity of their research and follows her as she begins to expose the dishonest use of false data to her colleagues, the university faculty senate, and ultimately the Federal Bureau of Investigations. Concludes with several of the scientists feeling as if their careers have been ruined and with the junior researcher feeling disheartened with the practice of science as carried out in the academic environment. From synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>WHISTLEBLOWING, VIDEO, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, PEER REVIEW, FRAUD, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, TRUTHTELLING, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/3/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0668</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1976</date>
		<title>When Will People Help?: The Social Psychology of Bystander Intervention.</title>
		<publication>In the Psychology Film Series, produced by Vision Associates and Lee R. Bobker, and distributed by Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.</publication>
		<annotation>Re-enacts and discusses experiments done by social psychologists at Stanford University concerning bystander intervention. Introduces the highly publicized Kitty Genovese case of 1964 in which thirty-eight neighbors failed to call the police of help a girl being murdered. Examines reasons why people would not help. Explains the steps that lead to bystander intervention: defining the situation as an emergency, feeling the weight of responsibility, and seeing other people help first from synopsis presented on http://media2.iss.indiana.edu/htbin/wwform/www/?TEXT=R1352176-1370658-/www/documents/188/cat/idx770.htm.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, VIDEO, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/19/1998</added>
		<modified>12/17/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0670</record_number>
		<author>Hornblum, Allen M.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Acres of Skin: Human Experiments at Holmesburg Prison</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Routledge.</publication>
		<annotation>This admirably comprehensive story of the use of prisoners for medical research is embarrassingly painful to read. This encyclopedic, well-documented treatise, with voluminous end notes, is a fascinating story for the casual read. from a review in <I>JAMA</I>, 280(17).</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, HUMAN SUBJECTS, CASE STUDIES, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>11/19/1998</added>
		<modified>8/2/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0671</record_number>
		<author>Brown, Sarah, and Michael W. Kalichman.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Effects of Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Survey of Graduate Students in Experimental Sciences.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, 4(4):487-498.</publication>
		<annotation>This was a study looking at the effectiveness of training in responsible science by giving a questionaire to graduate students receiving formal training in responsible research. The study found that the students' ethical outlook did not change as a result of the training, but their knowledge of options was expanded.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING ETHICS, RESEARCH ON ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/11/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0672</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Elliot.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Embargoes: Good, Bad, or 'Necessary Evil'?</title>
		<publication><i>Science</i>, 282:860-867.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses the issues of embargoes, which refers to the informal agreement between the mass media and scientific journals where the mass media receive advance notice of important journal aritcles but are forbidden from publishing stories until a predetermined time, generally coinciding with the general release of the journal. This contains several sidebars on specific issues, which include: Franz Ingelfinger's Lagacy Shaped Biology Publishing; describes the decision of the editor-in-chief of the <i>New England Journal of Medicine</i> to hold articles from the mass media, and the ramifications this had on the biology publishing world. Too Hot to Hold: Life on Mars and Cloned Sheep Couldn't Be Kept Under Wraps; this describes the scenarios of a meteorite that contained possible traces of extraterrestrial life and the cloning of Dolly, in which in spite of the embargoe the stories broke early. Trading in Science: A Volatile Mix of Stock Prices and Embargoed Data; Looks at the ramifications of embargoed data in the stock market, particularly at instances where and embargo was lifted because of concern about leaks causing market turmoil. Public Lashings and Blackballing Enforce System Built on Trust; Discusses the enforcement of the embargo system.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/11/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0673</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Scientific Meetings Produce Clash of Agendas.</title>
		<publication><i>Science</i>, 282:860-867.</publication>
		<annotation>This discusses the conflict of interests that the embargo system generates in the context of a scientific meeting. It points out that everyone involved in the endeavor, sponsors, journals, reporters, and scientists, have different agendas with unpublished data, and this can lead to conflict.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/11/1998</added>
		<modified>7/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0674</record_number>
		<author>Glanz, James.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>A Media Darling Thrives on Publicity.</title>
		<publication><i>Science</i>, 282:860-867.</publication>
		<annotation>This looks at the effects of the embargo system of publication in the field of astronomy. It chooses astronomy as the focus because the author asserts that this field relies on publicity more, and generates more publicity than most other scientific fields, and so the greatest problems are evident here.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>12/11/1998</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0675</record_number>
		<author>Bloom, Floyd E.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Embracing the Embargo.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 282:860-867.</publication>
		<annotation>An editorial about the embargo system. It claims that the embargo system is maligned because it is simply misunderstood, and that in reality the embargo works to the benefit of the scientific and the general community.</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>1/21/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0676</record_number>
		<author>King, Rod.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Ethical Conduct of Scientific Research.</title>
		<publication><i>Mill Hill Essays</i>, National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA.</publication>
		<annotation>A general essay about scientific research ethics, particularly as they play out in the English research community, though many of the points are very general.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>1/25/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0677</record_number>
		<author>Brody, Baruch A.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>The Ethics of Biomedical Research: An International Perspective</i>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>The book is divided into nine areas of interest … Each of these problem areas is systematically reviewed in relation to basic perceptions, attempts at consensus statements, and regulations. … The 38 appendices, which compromise more than a third of the book, provide a valuable collection of international and national regulations and policy statements from a review article in <i>JAMA</i>, (281):1, 88-89.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY, ANIMALS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, VULNERABLE POPULATIONS, CHILDREN, RESEARCH WITH MENTALLY IMPAIRED, WOMEN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/1/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0679</record_number>
		<author>Kevles, Daniel J.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science, and Character</i>.</title>
		<publication>New York: W.W. Norton.</publication>
		<annotation>It is disturbing that Kevles appears to have lost his objectivity. He reports that Baltimore's critics applied a 'mythical standard of scientific progress'. Kevles argues that nothing Baltimore could have done would have made any difference. Even more remarkably, Kevles seems to believe that attention to the issue was unwarranted from a review in <i>The New England Journal of Medicine</i>, 340(3):242.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, POLITICS, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, POLITICS, FRAUD, MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/1/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0681</record_number>
		<author>Turney, Jon.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Frankenstein's Footsteps: Science, Genetics, and Popular Culture</i>.</title>
		<publication>New Haven: Yale University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>In <i>Frankenstein's Footsteps</i>, Jon Turney examines how Mary Shelley's <i>Frankenstein</i> influenced popular ideas about the biomedical sciences. <i>Frankenstein's Footsteps</i> is orginal, provacative, instructive, and consistently interesting. Its appeal to historian's is self-evident, but molecular biologists, geneticists, and physicians with literary inclinations will surely find this book worthwhile from a review in <i>The New England Journal of Medicine</i>, 340(3):243-44.</annotation>
		<keywords>HISTORY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/4/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0682</record_number>
		<author>Macer, Darryl R. J.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Bioethics Is Love of Life: An Alternative Textbook</i>.</title>
		<publication>Ibaraki, Japan: Eubios Ethics Insitute.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/4/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0683</record_number>
		<author>Weir, Robert F.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal, and Public Policy Implications</i>.</title>
		<publication>Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, STORED TISSUES, LAW, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>2/10/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0684</record_number>
		<author>Office of the Inspector General, National Science Foundation.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Semiannual Report to the Congress</i>.</title>
		<publication>Government Publication.</publication>
		<annotation>This is the report of the NSF Office of the Inspector General to the Congress of the United States. It contains sections on Efficiency, Integrity, Legislative Proposals, and Statistical Data. The section on Integrity is of particular interest because it contains actual cases recently or currently being investigated by NSF. Also, there are past issues available at http://www.nsf.gov/cgi-bin/pubsys/browser/odbrowse.pl From this site choose the option to look for reports. Next choose the option to view documents from the office of the inspector general. This takes you to a a listing of the semiannual report for the past several years. These are available on-line in PDF or ASCII.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, POLITICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/9/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0685</record_number>
		<author>Farber, Paul Lawrence.</author>
		<date>1994</date>
		<title><i>The Temptations of Evolutionary Ethics</i>.</title>
		<publication>Berkely: University of California Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/9/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0686</record_number>
		<author>Pence, Gregory E.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Flesh of My Flesh: The Ethics of Cloning Humans - A Reader</i>.</title>
		<publication>Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CLONING, GENETIC RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/10/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0687</record_number>
		<author>Humber, James M., and Robert F. Almeder, eds.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Human Cloning</i>.</title>
		<publication>Totowa, NJ: Humana Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CLONING, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>3/10/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0688</record_number>
		<author>Switankowsky, Irene S.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>A New Paradigm for Informed Consent</i>.</title>
		<publication>Lanham, MD: University Press of America.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>INFORMED CONSENT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0689</record_number>
		<author>Tauber, Alfred I.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><i>Confessions of a Medicine Man: An Essay in Popular Philosophy</i>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0690</record_number>
		<author>Sugarman, Jeremy, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Ethics of Research with Human Subjects: Selected Policies and Resources</i>.</title>
		<publication>Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0691</record_number>
		<author>Dworkin, Gerald, et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide</i>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH, SUICIDE</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0692</record_number>
		<author>Petrinovich, Lewis.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Human Evolution, Reproduction, and Morality</i>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, EUGENICS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0693</record_number>
		<author>Petrinovich, Lewis.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Living and Dying Well</i>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DYING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0694</record_number>
		<author>Kahn, Jeffrey P., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>Beyond Consent: Seeking Justice in Research</i>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0695</record_number>
		<author>Rubin, Susan B.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>When Doctors Say No: The Battleground of Medical Futility</i>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/26/1999</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0696</record_number>
		<author>Jonsen, Albert R.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><i>The Birth of Bioethics</i>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>It [<i>The Birth of Bioethics</i>] is a worthy starting point for those interested in leaning about the field's emergence and fascinated by the puzzle of how it came to be what it is now. from a review in <i>JAMA</i>, 281(9).</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0697</record_number>
		<author>Parens, Erik, ed.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, EUGENICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0698</record_number>
		<author>Smith, David H., et al.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Early Warning: Cases and Ethical Guidance for Presymptomatic Testing in Genetic Diseases</I>.</title>
		<publication>Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC SCREENING, CASE STUDIES, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INFORMED CONSENT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0699</record_number>
		<author>Merrill, Sarah Bishop.</author>
		<date>1984</date>
		<title><I>Defining Personhood: Toward the Ethics of Quality in Clinical Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>Atlanta: Rodopi.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0700</record_number>
		<author>Petrinovich, Lewis.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Darwinian Dominion: Animal Welfare and Human Interests</I>.</title>
		<publication>Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0701</record_number>
		<author>Koch, Tom.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>The Limits of Principle: Deciding Who Lives and What Dies</I>.</title>
		<publication>Westport, CT: Praeger.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, DEATH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0702</record_number>
		<author>Gervais, Karen G., et al., ed.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Challenges in Managed Care: A Casebook</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0703</record_number>
		<author>Burgio, G. Roberto, and John D. Lantos, ed.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Primum Non Nocere Today</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Elsevier.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CHILDREN</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0704</record_number>
		<author>McGee, Glenn, ed.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Pragmatic Bioethics</I>.</title>
		<publication>Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0705</record_number>
		<author>King, Nancy M. P., et al, ed.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Beyond Regulations: Ethics in Human Subjects Research</I>.</title>
		<publication>Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0706</record_number>
		<author>Youngner, Stuart J., et al, ed.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>The Definition of Death: Contemporary Controversies.</I></title>
		<publication>Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DEATH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/4/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0707</record_number>
		<author>Wong, Kenman L.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title><I>Medicine and the Marketplace: The Moral Dimensions of Managed Care</I>.</title>
		<publication>Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0708</record_number>
		<author>Palmer, Michael.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Moral Problems in Medicine: A Practical Coursebook</I>.</title>
		<publication>Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0709</record_number>
		<author>O'Rourke, Kevin D., and Philip Boyle, ed.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><i>Medical Ethics: Sources of Catholic Teachings.</i>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0710</record_number>
		<author>Elliott, Carl.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>A Philosophical Disease: Bioethics, Culture, and Identity</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Routledge.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0711</record_number>
		<author>Freedman, Benjamin.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Duty and Healing: Foundations of a Jewish Bioethic</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Routledge.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0712</record_number>
		<author>Kuczewski, Mark, and Rosa Lynn B. Pinkus.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>An Ethics Casebook for Hospitals: Practical Approaches to Everyday Cases</I>.</title>
		<publication>Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, INFORMED CONSENT, DYING, CONFIDENTIALITY, SUICIDE, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0713</record_number>
		<author>Smith, Trevor.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Ethics in Medical Research: A Handbook of Good Practice</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Cambridge University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS HANDBOOK, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/5/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0714</record_number>
		<author>DesAutels, Peggy, et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Praying for a Cure: When Medical and Religious Practices Conflict</I>.</title>
		<publication>Lanham, MD: Roman and Littlefield Publishers.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>9/12/2002</modified>
		<record_number>0715</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>A Drug Company's Effort to Silence a Researcher: The Case of Nancy Olivieri.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Vol. 85, No. 6 (Nov.):25</publication>
		<annotation>Ethical behavior puts a professor at risk.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, CASE STUDIES, WOMEN, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, ACADEMIC ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0716</record_number>
		<author>Dagg, Anne Innis.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Responsible Animal-Based Research: Three Flags to Consider.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science</I>, 21(4):337.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0717</record_number>
		<author>Zaroug, Abdullahi Hassan.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethics from an Islamic Perspective: Basic Issues.</title>
		<publication><I>American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences</I>, Vol. 16, No. 3 (Fall):45.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, RELIGION, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0718</record_number>
		<author>Shapiro, Harold T.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Reflections on the Interface of Bioethics, Public Policy, and Science.</title>
		<publication><I>Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal</I>, Vol. 9, No. 3 (Sept.):209.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>4/6/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0719</record_number>
		<author>Harris, John.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Genetic Research on Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Jurimetrics</I>, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Fall):77.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0720</record_number>
		<author>Lynde, Niels, et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Fraud, Misconduct or Normal Science in Medical Research--An Empirical Study of Domination.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Medical Ethics</I>, Vol. 25, No. 6 (Dec.):501</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>FRAUD, MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>7/31/2002</modified>
		<record_number>0721</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Ethical Standards for Publication of Aeronautics and Astronautics Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics</I>, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Jan.):9.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>7/18/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0722</record_number>
		<author>Fraser, D.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Animal Ethics and Animal Welfare Science: Bridging the Two Cultures.</title>
		<publication><I>Applied Animal Behaviour Science</I>, 65(3):171.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/6/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0723</record_number>
		<author>Sque, M.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Researching the Bereaved: An Investigator's Experience.</title>
		<publication><I>Nursing Ethics</I>, Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan.):23.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, CASE STUDIES, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH WITH EMOTIONALLY IMPAIRED</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0724</record_number>
		<author>Roberts, Laura Weiss, and Brian Roberts.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Psychiatric Research Ethics: An Overview of Evolving Guidelines and Current Ethical Dilemmas in the Study of Mental Illness.</title>
		<publication><I>Biological Psychiatry</I>, Vol. 46, No. 8 (Oct. 15):1025.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH WITH PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPAIRED, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0725</record_number>
		<author>Vitiello, Benedetto, et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Integrating Science and Ethics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Biological Psychiatry</I>, Vol. 46, No. 8 (Oct. 15):1044.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, CHILDREN, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0726</record_number>
		<author>Jeste, Dilip V., et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Neuroleptic Discontinuation in Clinical and Research Settings: Scientific Issues and Ethical Dilemmas.</title>
		<publication><I>Biological Psychiatry</I>, Vol. 46, No. 8 (Oct. 15):1050.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0727</record_number>
		<author>Roberts, Laura Weiss.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Dimensions of Psychiatric Research: A Constructive, Criterion-Base Approach to Protocol Preparation.</title>
		<publication><I>Biological Psychiatry</I>, Vol. 46, No. 8 (Oct. 15):1106.</publication>
		<annotation>The Research Protocol Ethics Assessment...(RePEAT).</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0728</record_number>
		<author>Margolis, Lew.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Ethical Principles for Analyzing Dilemmas in Sex Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Health Education and Behavior</I>, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Feb.):24.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0729</record_number>
		<author>Hull, David.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Guidelines for the Ethical Conduct of Medical Research Involving Children.</title>
		<publication><I>Archives of Disease in Childhood</I>, Vol. 82, No. 2 (Feb.):177.</publication>
		<annotation>Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Ethics Advisory Committee: Commentary.</annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, CHILDREN, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0730</record_number>
		<author>Resnik, David B.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The Human Genome Diversity Project: Ethical Problems and Solutions.</title>
		<publication><I>Politics and the Life Sciences</I>, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Mar.):15.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, AT-RISK POPULATIONS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/7/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0731</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Aspects of Research Involving the Use of Human Embryos in the Context of the Fifth Framework Program.</title>
		<publication><I>Politics and the Life Sciences</I>, Vol. 18, No. 1 (Mar.):123.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0732</record_number>
		<author>Olsen, D. P.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Equipoise: An Appropriate Standard for Ethical Review of Nursing Research?</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Advanced Nursing</I>, Vol. 31, No.2 (Feb.):267.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0733</record_number>
		<author>Spier, Raymond, and Stephanie J. Bird.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Scientific Misconduct: Ongoing Developments.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):3.</publication>
		<annotation>Editorial.</annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0734</record_number>
		<author>Rhoades, Lawrence, and Adrzej Gorski.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Scientific Misconduct: An International Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No.1 (Jan.):5.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0735</record_number>
		<author>Brydensholt, Hans Henrik.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>The Legal Basis for the Danish Committee on Scientific Dishonesty.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):11.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>LAW, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0736</record_number>
		<author>Andersen, Daniel.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>From Case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):25.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, DECEPTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0737</record_number>
		<author>Riis, Povl.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Sociology and Psychology within the Scope of Scientific Dishonesty.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan ):35.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, DECEPTION, PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0738</record_number>
		<author>Breittmayer, J.-P., et al.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct: The Procedure of the French National Medical and Health Research Institute.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):41.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0739</record_number>
		<author>Schneider, Christoph.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice: New Institutional Approaches in Germany.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):49.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0740</record_number>
		<author>Stegemann-Boehl, Stefanie.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Misconduct in Science and the German Law.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1(Jan.):57.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0741</record_number>
		<author>Tolloczko, Tadeusz.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Ethical Implications in the Allocation of Scarce Medical Resources in Poland.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1(Jan.):63.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0742</record_number>
		<author>Switula, Dorota.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) in Clinical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1(Jan.):79.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0743</record_number>
		<author>Hansson, Mats G.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Protecting Research Integrity.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):79.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0744</record_number>
		<author>Evans, Imogen.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>The Medical Research Council's Approach to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):91</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0745</record_number>
		<author>Rhoades, Lawrence J.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>The American Experience: Lessons Learned.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No.1 (Jan.):95.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0746</record_number>
		<author>Dooley, James J., and Helen M. Kerch.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Evolving Research Misconduct Policies and Their Significance for Physical Scientists.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):109.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0747</record_number>
		<author>Bird, Stephanie J., and Alicia K. Dustira.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>New Common Federal Definition of Research Misconduct in the United States.</title>
		<publication><I>Science and Engineering Ethics</I>, Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan.):123.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>DEFINITION OF MISCONDUCT, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, RESEARCH MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/10/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0748</record_number>
		<author>Denker, H.-W.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Embryonic Stem Cells: An Exciting Field for Basic Research and Tissue Engineering, but Also an Ethical Dilemma?</title>
		<publication><I>Cells, Tissues, Organs</I>, 165(3/4):246.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0749</record_number>
		<author>Lock, Margaret</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Genetic Diversity and the Politics of Difference.</title>
		<publication><I>Chicago-Kent Law Review</I>, 75(1):83</publication>
		<annotation>The Human Genome Diversity Project has encountered worldwide criticism of its activities both by the peoples it proposes to study and scientists. Reasons for this criticism are examined with an emphasis on the wide-spread fears associated with increased commodification of human DNA. It is argued that, in spite of the proposed involvement of communities in research design and the revision of ethical protocols, confrontational biopolitics associated with the procurement of human tissue samples will continue, particularly when indigenous peoples are made into research subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS, AT-RISK POPULATIONS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, MINORITY POPULATIONS, POLITICS, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0750</record_number>
		<author>Krimsky, Sheldon.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The Profit of Scientific Discovery and Its Normative Implications.</title>
		<publication><I>Chicago-Kent Law Review</I>, 75(1):15.</publication>
		<annotation>The discovery of recombinant DNA techniques for the transplantation of genes across virtually any two species was followed by the rapid commercialization of molecular biology. University-industry partnerships exploded in response to a series of federal policies designed to speed up technology transfer and a decision by the Supreme Court in 1980 that living things are patentable subject matter. The commingling of academic science and entrepreneurship has raised ethical concerns about the patentability of genes, the decline in objectivity on biomedical science, the privatization of knowledge, and increasing conflicts of interest among researchers.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, SECRECY, POLICY, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, BIOLOGY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, LAW</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0751</record_number>
		<author>Spriggs, Merle.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Human Subjects Research: Review of the NHandMRC National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans.</title>
		<publication><I>Monash Bioethics Review</I>, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Oct.):5.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>2/15/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0752</record_number>
		<author>Ashcroft, Richard E.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The New National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans: A Social Theoretic Perspective.</title>
		<publication><I>Monash Bioethics Review</I>, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Oct.):14.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0754</record_number>
		<author>Burkholder, JoAnn M., and Howard B. Glasgow, Jr.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Science Ethics and Its Role in Early Suppression of the Pfiesteria Issue.</title>
		<publication><I>Human Organization</I>, Vol. 58, No. 4 (Winter):443.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0755</record_number>
		<author>Wikier, D., and T. Pang.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Developing-world Research Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>The Lancet</I>, Vol. 355, No. 9197 (Jan.):70</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0756</record_number>
		<author>Kaushal, P., et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Aspects in Genetic Counselling.</title>
		<publication><I>Current Science</I>, Vol. 77, No. 10 (Nov. 25):1236.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC COUNSELING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0757</record_number>
		<author>Langer, Nieli.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Infusing Ethics Content into the Social Gerontology Curriculum.</title>
		<publication><I>Gerontology and Geriatrics Education</I>, 20(1):31.</publication>
		<annotation>This article addresses the need for social gerontology students to understand and learn to resolve ethical dilemmas in practice, social policy and planning, and research. Often gerontology programs face the challenge of providing more content in a curriculum in a finite amount of time. A flexible approach to infusing ethics into existing social gerontology courses is discussed which provides the basis for an integrative approach to learning.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0758</record_number>
		<author>Stock, Gregory, and John Campbell, ed.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title><I>Engineering the Human Germline: An Exploration of the Science and Ethics of Altering the Genes We Pass to Our Children</I>.</title>
		<publication>New York: Oxford University Press.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0195133021.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, EUGENICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/11/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0759</record_number>
		<author>Kitchener, Karen S.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title><I>Foundations of Ethical Practice, Research and Teaching in Psychology</I>.</title>
		<publication>Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.</publication>
		<annotation>Includes bibliographical references and index.</annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/19/2000</added>
		<modified>6/1/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0760</record_number>
		<author>Mastroianni, Anna C., and Jeffrey P. Kahn.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>The Importance of Expanding Current Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, Vol. 73, No 12 (Dec.):1249-1254.</publication>
		<annotation>Despite the growing need to teach principles of the responsible conduct of research (RCR) to those training to be biomedical researchers, no descriptive, easily compared information about the nation's RCR programs exists. To draw some preliminary conclusions..., the authors reviewed materials collected by the DHHS in 1996. ...The training programs were quite diverse... . The authors review the obstacles to effective RCR training and discuss ways to foster such programs... .</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, ASSESSMENT OF TEACHING, TEACHING, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/19/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0761</record_number>
		<author>Pattison, Stephen, et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Do Case Studies Mislead about the Nature of Reality?</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Medical Ethics</I>, 25:42-46.</publication>
		<annotation>Attempts a partial, critical look at the construction and use of case studies in ethics education; argues that the authors and users of case studies are often insufficiently aware of the literary nature of these artefacts which may lead to some confusion between fiction and reality.</annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS INSTRUCTION, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/19/2000</added>
		<modified>4/19/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0762</record_number>
		<author>Feenberg, Andrew.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>No Frills in the Virtual Classroom.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Vol., 85, No. 5 (Sept.-Oct.):26-31.</publication>
		<annotation>Both promoters and opponents of online education have got it wrong. Technology can enhance the curriculum, but mainly when it's the low tech, labor intensive type used for writing.</annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING, COMPUTERS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/19/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0763</record_number>
		<author>Griffin, C. W.</author>
		<date>1983</date>
		<title>Using Writing to Teach Many Disciplines.</title>
		<publication><I>Improving College and University Teaching</I>, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Summer):121-128.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/19/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0764</record_number>
		<author>Freeman, Thomas B., et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Use of Placebo Surgery in Controlled Trials of a Cellular-Based Therapy for Parkinson's Disease.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 341, No. 13 (Sept. 23):988-992.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, TRUTHTELLING, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0765</record_number>
		<author>Dickert, Neal, and Christine Grady.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>'What's the Price of a Research Subject? : Approaches to Payment for Research Participation.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 341, No. 3 (July 15):198-202.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, INDUCEMENTS, COMPENSATION, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0766</record_number>
		<author>Bartlett, Robert H., et al.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Extracorporeal Life Support: The University of Michigan Experience.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 283, No. 7 (Feb. 16):904-908.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents evidence that ECLS saves lives of acute cardiac or pulmonary patients.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH WITH DYING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0767</record_number>
		<author>Garber, Judy.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>A 40-Year-Old Woman with a Strong Family History of Breast Cancer.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 282, No. 20 (Nov. 24):1953-1960.</publication>
		<annotation>Topics discussed include: (1) estimating breast cancer risk, (2) arguments against testing every woman for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (genes associated with increased incidence), (3) factors influencing decision to undergo genetic testing, and (4) medical management of inherited breast cancer risk.</annotation>
		<keywords>CASE STUDIES, GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC COUNSELING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0768</record_number>
		<author>Cabana, Michael D., et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Why Don't Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines?: A Framework for Improvement.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 282, No. 15 (Oct. 20):1458-1464.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses a variety of barriers to following guidelines, including: (1) lack of knowledge (awareness or familiarity), (2) attitudes (lack of agreement, lack of confidence in ability, lack of outcome experience, inertia of previous practice), and (3) behavior (external barriers: guideline, patient, or environmentally related).</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0769</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Primary Care Research and Protection for Human Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 281, No. 18 (May 12):1697-1698.</publication>
		<annotation>A letter to the editor by John Beasley, MD (response to Dr. Mareno et al.). Discusses the need for developing rules and procedures which both protect subjects and facilitate developing a primary care research base.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0770</record_number>
		<author>Brennan, Troyen A.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Proposed Revisions to the Declaration of Helsinki--Will They Weaken the Ethical Principles Underlying Human Research?</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 341, No. 7 (Aug. 12):527-534.</publication>
		<annotation>Author claims changes will undermine individual rights and that we ought not revise it.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0771</record_number>
		<author>Woodward, Beverly.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Challenges to Human Subject Protections in US Medical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 282, No. 20 (Nov. 24):1947-1952.</publication>
		<annotation>Author discusses topic of revisions to Declaration of Helsinki. Topics addressed include: (1) historical background (Nuremberg Code and Declaration of Helsinki), (2) pressures to weaken human subject protections, (3) Institutional Review Boards (IRB's), (4) problems defining risk, (5) misjudgments and differences in interpretation of risk, (6) inconsistencies, uncertainties, and disagreements about consent requirement, and (7) merging clinical practice and medical research.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICY, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), INFORMED CONSENT, HISTORY, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICT OF INTEREST</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0772</record_number>
		<author>Ellis, Gary B.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Keeping Research Subjects Out of Harm's Way.</title>
		<publication><I>JAMA</I>, Vol. 282, No. 20 (Nov. 24):1963-1965.</publication>
		<annotation>Editorial discusses need for continuing education about nuances of protecting rights and welfare of research subjects.</annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, IRB (INTERNAL REVIEW BOARD), INFORMED CONSENT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0773</record_number>
		<author>Charo, R. Alta.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Academe Should Support New Guidelines to Protect Mentally Ill Research Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Mar. 2:B9-B10.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH WITH EMOTIONALLY IMPAIRED, GOVERNMENT REGULATION, INFORMED CONSENT, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0774</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Researchers Urged to Avoid Restrictive Pacts.</title>
		<publication><I>Academe</I>, Vol. 85, No. 5 (Sept.-Oct.):17.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS POLICY, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST, SECRECY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0775</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>More about Parkinsonism after Taking Ecstasy.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 341, No. 18 (Oct. 28):1400-1401.</publication>
		<annotation>Letter to the Editor by George J. Borge (response to S. Mintzer et al.).</annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, TRUTHTELLING, CONFIDENTIALITY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0776</record_number>
		<author>Frank, Lone.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Storm Brews over Gene Bank of Estonian Population.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 286 (Nov. 12):1262-1263.</publication>
		<annotation>Discusses opposition to new Genome Center. The health care system is already underfunded. The population has more immediate problems (smoking, drugs, etc.).</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0777</record_number>
		<author>Rhodes, Rosamond.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Genetic Links, Family Ties, and Social Bonds: Rights and Responsibilities in the Face of Genetic Knowledge.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Medicine and Philosophy</I>, 23(1):10-30.</publication>
		<annotation>Asks: Do individuals have responsibilities to others regarding genetic knowledge? Do individuals have a moral right to pursue their own goals without contributing to society's knowledge in genetics?</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, GENETIC COUNSELING, GENETIC TESTING, GENETIC SCREENING, ETHICS, CASE STUDIES</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0778</record_number>
		<author>Cho, Mildred K., et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Genetics: Ethical Considerations in Synthesizing a Minimal Genome.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, Vol. 286, No. 5447 (Dec. 10):2087-2090.</publication>
		<annotation>Discussion includes (1) definition and application of a Minimal Genome, (2) defining life: realizing reductionism, and (3) religious issues.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RELIGION, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/27/2000</added>
		<modified>7/21/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0779</record_number>
		<author>McDonald, Kim A.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>MIT Scientists Create Human Cancer Cells.</title>
		<publication><I>Chronicle of Higher Education</I>, Aug. 6:A23.</publication>
		<annotation>Presents Nature's July 29, 1999, announcement of this event.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/28/2000</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0780</record_number>
		<author>Enserink, Martin.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Fickle Mice Highlight Test Problems.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 284 (June 4):1998-1999.</publication>
		<annotation>The phenomenon of findings about gene-related behavior becoming spurious.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, ANIMALS, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/28/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0781</record_number>
		<author>Knoppers, Bartha Maria, et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Commercialization of Genetic Research and Public Policy.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 286 (Dec. 17):2277-2278.</publication>
		<annotation>Claim: to map genetic material is increasingly an object of commerce. Is this commercilization appropriate? Presents four approaches to dealing with this question: (1) human rights, (2) statutory, (3) administrative, and (4) market driven. Author concludes: each approach has disadvantages and advantages. Policy decisions should be made according to the particular values and needs and populations at the time.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, POLICY, SCIENCE AND SOCIETY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/28/2000</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0782</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title>Eugenics Archive: Lessons from the Past.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, Vol. 287 (Feb. 18):1163.</publication>
		<annotation>Announcement of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory's DNA Learning Center in 2/2000. Archive contains over 1200 photos, charts, and other documents from early 20th century eugeneics era.</annotation>
		<keywords>EUGENICS, HISTORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/28/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0783</record_number>
		<author>Marshall, Eliot.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Beryllium Screening Raises Ethical Issues.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 285 (July 9):178-179.</publication>
		<annotation>Discussion of the ethical debate over research on genetic risks in the workplace. Workers are screened with a blood test to see if their immune systems have become hypersensitized to beryllium (this indicates a greater probablity of developing CBD-chronic beryllium disease). If they test positive, they can lose their jobs which is a kind of job discrimination.</annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, GENETIC SCREENING, GENETIC TESTING, ETHICS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/28/2000</added>
		<modified>7/14/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0784</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>ScienceScope.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, 284 (May 14):1097.</publication>
		<annotation>Short discussion: (1) research freeze at Duke U. and (2) France's genome project.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, GENETIC RESEARCH, SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>4/28/2000</added>
		<modified>4/28/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0785</record_number>
		<author></author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Shalala Appoints Chair and Members of Genetic Testing Advisory Committee.</title>
		<publication></publication>
		<annotation>Press Release of June 4.</annotation>
		<keywords>GOVERNMENT REGULATION, GENETIC TESTING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0786</record_number>
		<author>Jones, Anne Hudson, and Faith McLellan, eds.</author>
		<date>2000</date>
		<title><I>Ethical Issues in Biomedical Publication</I>.</title>
		<publication>Johns Hopkins University Press.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PUBLISHING, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0787</record_number>
		<author>Backlar, Patricia.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethics in Community Mental Health Care: Public Bioethics and Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders.</title>
		<publication><I>Community Mental Health Journal</I>, Vol. 35, No.5 (Oct. 1):389.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, RESEARCH WITH PSYCHOLOGICALLY IMPAIRED, COMMUNITY INTERESTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0788</record_number>
		<author>Bereano, Philip L.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The National Bioethics Advisory Commission Report on the Use of Human Biological Materials and Research: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidelines.</title>
		<publication><I>Biotechnology Law Report</I>, Vol. 18, No. 4 (Aug. 1):322.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, POLICY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>7/17/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0789</record_number>
		<author>Carmi, Rivka.</author>
		<date>1998</date>
		<title>Ethical Aspects of Genetic Research and Its Applications.</title>
		<publication><I>Science in Context</I>, Vol. 11, No. 3 and 4 (Fall):391.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0790</record_number>
		<author>Doerflinger, Richard M.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The Ethics of Funding Embryonic Stem Cell Research: A Catholic Viewpoint.</title>
		<publication><I>Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal</I>, Vol. 9, No. 2 (June):137.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, RELIGION, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0791</record_number>
		<author>Ellis, Gary B.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Protecting the Rights and Welfare of Human Research Subjects.</title>
		<publication><I>Academic Medicine</I>, Vol. 74, No. 9 (Sept.):1008.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0792</record_number>
		<author>Fuller, B. P., et al.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethics: Privacy in Genetics Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, Vol. 285, No. 5432 (Aug. 27):1359.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, CONFIDENTIALITY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0793</record_number>
		<author>Gillon, Raanan.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Research into Emergency Treatments--Could the Offer of 'Advance Directives' Help?.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Medical Ethics</I>, Vol. 25, No. 4 (Aug.):291.</publication>
		<annotation>Editorial.</annotation>
		<keywords>HUMAN SUBJECTS, RESEARCH ETHICS, DYING, RESEARCH WITH DYING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0794</record_number>
		<author>Ham, Vincent.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Tracking the Truth or Selling One's Soul?: Reflections on the Ethics of a Piece of Commissioned Research.</title>
		<publication><I>British Journal of Educational Studies</I>, Vol. 47, No. 3 (Sept.):275.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, TRUTHTELLING, PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0795</record_number>
		<author>Hansen, Nancy Downing, and Susan G. Goldberg.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Navigating the Nuances: A Matrix of Considerations for Ethical-Legal Dilemmas.</title>
		<publication><I>Professional Psychology</I>, Vol. 30, No. 5 (Oct.):495.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PSYCHOLOGY, RESEARCH ETHICS, LAW, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0796</record_number>
		<author>Kerin, Jacinta.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Genetic Research and Biological Weapons: The Ethics of the Human Genome Project.</title>
		<publication><I>Monash Bioethics Review</I>, Vol. 18, No. 3 (July):1.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0797</record_number>
		<author>King, Imogene M.</author>
		<date></date>
		<title>A Theory of Goal Attainment: Philosophical and Ethical Implications.</title>
		<publication><I>Nursing Science Quarterly</I>, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Oct.):292.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICAL THEORY</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0798</record_number>
		<author>McGee, Glenn, and Arthur Caplan.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The Ethics and Politics of Small Sacrifices in Stem Cell Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal</I>, Vol. 9, No. 2 (June):151.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>GENETIC RESEARCH, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, POLITICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0799</record_number>
		<author>McLaughlin, Denis.</author>
		<date>1995</date>
		<title>Teaching Overseas Students and Learning from Them: A Professional and Moral Dimension.</title>
		<publication><I>Education, Research and Perspectives</I>, Vol. 22, No. 1 (June):103.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0800</record_number>
		<author>Milton, Constance L.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Codes and Principles: The Link to Nursing Theory.</title>
		<publication><I>Nursing Science Quarterly</I>, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Oct.):290.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>PROFESSIONAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0801</record_number>
		<author>Ramsay, S.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>More Developments in Developing-World Research Ethics.</title>
		<publication><I>Lancet</I>, Vol. 354, No. 9188 (Oct. 23):1405.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0802</record_number>
		<author>Reisch, Michael, and Felix Rivera.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical and Racial Conflicts in Urban-Based Action Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Community Practice</I>, 6(2):49.</publication>
		<annotation>Through the use of a case study of a joint faculty-student research project, this paper discusses how community-based action research, policy analysis, and community organizing can be synthesized in work with low-income communities. It outlines potential implications of this synthesis for both community practice and social work education.</annotation>
		<keywords>SOCIAL RESEARCH ETHICS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, CASE STUDIES, ETHICS INSTRUCTION</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/1/2000</added>
		<modified>7/24/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0803</record_number>
		<author>Riley, Alan, and Elizabeth Scott.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethics in Research into Human Sexuality and into Sexual and Relationship Therapy.</title>
		<publication><I>Sexual and Marital Therapy</I>, 14(3):289.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH, BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0805</record_number>
		<author>Macklin, Ruth.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>The Ethical Problems with Sham Surgery in Clinical Research.</title>
		<publication><I>New England Journal of Medicine</I>, Vol. 341, No. 13 (Sept. 23):992-996.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS, INFORMED CONSENT, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0806</record_number>
		<author>Robertson, John A.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethics and Policy in Embryonic Stem Cell Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal</I>, Vol. 9, No. 2 (June):109.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH, POLICY, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0807</record_number>
		<author>Rochow, Y. B. Meyer.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Evolving Participation of Aboriginal Communities in Health Research Ethics Review.</title>
		<publication><I>International Journal of Circumpolar Health</I>, Vol. 58, No. 2 (Apr.):134.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, AT-RISK POPULATIONS, COMMUNITY INTERESTS, BIOMEDICAL ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0808</record_number>
		<author>Schillo, K. K.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>An Appropriate Role for Ethics in Teaching Contemporary Issues.</title>
		<publication><I>Journal of Dairy Science</I>, Vol. 82, Supplement 2:154.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ETHICS, TEACHING</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0809</record_number>
		<author>Schuklenk, Udo.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>International Research Ethics Guidelines to Be Revised--in Nearly Complete Secrecy.</title>
		<publication><I>Monash Bioethics Review</I>, Vol. 18, No. 3 (July):18.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS POLICIES, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0810</record_number>
		<author>Seale, Jane K., and Sue Barnard.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Considerations in Therapy Research.</title>
		<publication><I>British Journal of Occupational Therapy</I>, Vol. 62, No. 8 (Aug.):371.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>RESEARCH ETHICS, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>7/13/2000</modified>
		<record_number>0811</record_number>
		<author>Shapiro, H. T.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Ethical Dilemmas and Stem Cell Research.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, Vol. 285, No. 5436 (Sept. 24):2065.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, RESEARCH ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0812</record_number>
		<author>Smyth, R. L., and A. M. Weindling.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Research in Children: Ethical and Scientific Aspects.</title>
		<publication><I>Lancet</I>, Vol. 354, Supplement 2 (Sept.):21.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>CHILDREN, RESEARCH ETHICS, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, HUMAN SUBJECTS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0813</record_number>
		<author>Sugarman, J.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Human Genetics: Ethical Considerations in Leaping from Bench to Bedside.</title>
		<publication><I>Science</I>, Vol. 285, No. 5436 (Sept. 24):2071.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>BIOMEDICAL ETHICS, GENETIC RESEARCH</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</added>
		<modified>6/4/2001</modified>
		<record_number>0814</record_number>
		<author>Thompson, P.B., and A. Nardone.</author>
		<date>1999</date>
		<title>Sustainable Livestock Production: Methodological and Ethical Challenges.</title>
		<publication><I>Livestock Production Science</I>, Vol. 61, No.2-3 (Oct.):111.</publication>
		<annotation></annotation>
		<keywords>ANIMALS, GENETIC RESEARCH, RESEARCH ETHICS</keywords>
	</bib_record>
	<bib_record>
		<added>5/2/2000</adde